Re: [oam] Do we want to meet informally in Beijing ?

The home area and WG is not that important - RTGAREA could be a good
home also. My point is that going through the preBOF / BOF / new WG
creation path is not the only option for doing such work, doing it in
one (or more) of the existing WGs would shorten the path. 

I would also be interested in participating in a meeting in Beijing (if
it's an ad-hoc) - time allowing. 

Dan

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Yaakov Stein [mailto:yaakov_s@rad.com] 
> Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2010 9:50 PM
> To: Romascanu, Dan (Dan); Adrian Farrel; oam@ietf.org
> Subject: RE: [oam] Do we want to meet informally in Beijing ?
> 
> Dan and Adrian
> 
> It depends on how many people are interested in working on 
> this document.
> 
> I have no problem with the OPS area providing a "home" for 
> this work, but am not sure that it is a good fit (a lot of it 
> is MPLS-TP related).
> 
> Y(J)S
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Romascanu, Dan (Dan) [mailto:dromasca@avaya.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2010 21:47
> To: Adrian Farrel; Yaakov Stein; oam@ietf.org
> Subject: RE: [oam] Do we want to meet informally in Beijing ?
> 
> That's certainly fine and they can do it at any time. I was 
> misguided by the ' too late to request scheduling of an 
> official BOF' in his initial mail. 
> 
> Dan
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Adrian Farrel [mailto:Adrian.Farrel@huawei.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2010 9:44 PM
> > To: Romascanu, Dan (Dan); Yaakov Stein; oam@ietf.org
> > Subject: Re: [oam] Do we want to meet informally in Beijing ?
> > 
> > I think Yaakov is suggesting that the authors of a document 
> might want 
> > to get together to discuss its contents.
> > 
> > A
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com>
> > To: "Yaakov Stein" <yaakov_s@rad.com>; <oam@ietf.org>
> > Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2010 8:38 PM
> > Subject: Re: [oam] Do we want to meet informally in Beijing ?
> > 
> > 
> > > Cannot this document be discussed in OPSAWG? Same for other
> > documents in
> > > the agenda, it looks to me there is home for them in
> > existing WGs - we
> > > do not need a distinct gathering. Am I missing something?
> > >
> > > Dan
> > >
> > >
> > >> -----Original Message-----
> > >> From: Yaakov Stein [mailto:yaakov_s@rad.com]
> > >> Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2010 9:33 PM
> > >> To: Romascanu, Dan (Dan); oam@ietf.org
> > >> Subject: RE: [oam] Do we want to meet informally in Beijing ?
> > >>
> > >> we = "people participating in the meeting either 
> physically or via 
> > >> WebEx" OR
> > >>      "people following the OAM email list and desiring to help 
> > >> progress this work"
> > >>
> > >> purpose = progressing the document Ron proposed
> > >>
> > >> Y(J)S
> > >>
> > >> -----Original Message-----
> > >> From: Romascanu, Dan (Dan) [mailto:dromasca@avaya.com]
> > >> Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2010 21:24
> > >> To: Yaakov Stein; oam@ietf.org
> > >> Subject: RE: [oam] Do we want to meet informally in Beijing ?
> > >>
> > >> Who is 'we' and what would be the purpose of the meeting?
> > >>
> > >> Dan
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> > -----Original Message-----
> > >> > From: oam-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:oam-bounces@ietf.org] On
> > >> Behalf Of
> > >> > Yaakov Stein
> > >> > Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2010 9:19 PM
> > >> > To: oam@ietf.org
> > >> > Subject: [oam] Do we want to meet informally in Beijing ?
> > >> >
> > >> > Hi all,
> > >> >
> > >> > Even if it is too late to request scheduling of an official
> > >> BOF, do we
> > >> > want to get together at the upcoming IETF ?
> > >> >
> > >> > Y(J)S
> > >> > _______________________________________________
> > >> > oam mailing list
> > >> > oam@ietf.org
> > >> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oam
> > >> >
> > >>
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > oam mailing list
> > > oam@ietf.org
> > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oam
> > > 
> > 
> > 
> 