IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [oam] Do we want to meet informally in Beijing ?

Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com> Tue, 12 October 2010 20:43 UTC

Return-Path: <fred@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: oam@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oam@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF0393A69B0 for <oam@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Oct 2010 13:43:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.294
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.294 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.305, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id URGpQPCaWnfT for <oam@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Oct 2010 13:43:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sj-iport-6.cisco.com (sj-iport-6.cisco.com [171.71.176.117]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A88B53A6A55 for <oam@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Oct 2010 13:43:35 -0700 (PDT)
Authentication-Results: sj-iport-6.cisco.com; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvsEALVltEyrR7H+/2dsb2JhbAChX3GhfZ0BhUgEhFKFb4MD
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.57,321,1283731200"; d="scan'208";a="602970622"
Received: from sj-core-2.cisco.com ([171.71.177.254]) by sj-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP; 12 Oct 2010 20:44:50 +0000
Received: from stealth-10-32-244-219.cisco.com (stealth-10-32-244-219.cisco.com [10.32.244.219]) by sj-core-2.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o9CKiN29020144; Tue, 12 Oct 2010 20:44:44 GMT
Received: from [127.0.0.1] by stealth-10-32-244-219.cisco.com (PGP Universal service); Tue, 12 Oct 2010 13:44:50 -0700
X-PGP-Universal: processed; by stealth-10-32-244-219.cisco.com on Tue, 12 Oct 2010 13:44:50 -0700
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081)
From: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <48E7911F78327A449A9FB95637667286A82DCAA5@exrad4.ad.rad.co.il>
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2010 13:44:44 -0700
Message-Id: <1D69802F-64B3-492D-A253-9D53ADE3A804@cisco.com>
References: <13205C286662DE4387D9AF3AC30EF456B020AC31ED@EMBX01-WF.jnpr.net> <48E7911F78327A449A9FB95637667286A82DCAA5@exrad4.ad.rad.co.il>
To: Yaakov Stein <yaakov_s@rad.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "oam@ietf.org" <oam@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [oam] Do we want to meet informally in Beijing ?
X-BeenThere: oam@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "For discussion and announcements related to the IAB/IESG joint design session on Forwarding Plane Operations, Administration and Maintenance \(OAM\)." <oam.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oam>, <mailto:oam-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oam>
List-Post: <mailto:oam@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oam-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oam>, <mailto:oam-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2010 20:43:36 -0000

I'd be interested assuming it doesn't overlap something else.

On Oct 12, 2010, at 12:19 PM, Yaakov Stein wrote:

> Hi all, 
> 
> Even if it is too late to request scheduling of an official BOF,
> do we want to get together at the upcoming IETF ?
> 
> Y(J)S 
> _______________________________________________
> oam mailing list
> oam@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oam

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email