Re: [oauth-ext-review] [IANA #1158951] Requested review for IANA registration in draft-ietf-ace-oauth-authz (oauth-parameters - OAuth Extensions Error, OAuth Access Token Types, OAuth Parameters, OAuth Token Introspection Response)

The registration request is missing the “cnonce” and “exi" claims, both of which are mentioned in 5.7.2 but aren’t listed in the registry request. If those are added then I think the registration is fine.

 — Justin

> On Jan 7, 2020, at 5:50 PM, Amanda Baber via RT <drafts-expert-review@iana.org> wrote:
> 
> Hi Justin, all,
> 
> Because Hannes is both an author and the sole designated expert for the registries named in Sections 8.2, 8.5, and 8.8, Ben is reviewing those registrations for us. Of the sections listed below, we only need Justin to review this one:
> 
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ace-oauth-authz-29#section-8.10
> 
> We've sent Ben's questions/comments to the authors and chairs. 
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Amanda Baber
> Lead IANA Services Specialist
> 
> On Sat Dec 21 11:33:52 2019, ludwig_seitz@gmx.de wrote:
>> Hello OAuth registry reviewers,
>> 
>> the IESG-designated experts for the OAuth parameters registry have asked
>> me to send a review request to you about the OAuth parameters registered
>> here:
>> 
>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ace-oauth-authz-29#section-8.2
>> 
>> and here:
>> 
>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ace-oauth-authz-29#section-8.5
>> 
>> and here:
>> 
>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ace-oauth-authz-29#section-8.8
>> 
>> and here:
>> 
>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ace-oauth-authz-29#section-8.10
>> 
>> 
>> Thank you in advance for you review comments.
>> 
>> Regards,
>> 
>> Ludwig
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> oauth-ext-review mailing list
> oauth-ext-review@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth-ext-review