[oauth-ext-review] [IANA #1216703] Expert Review for draft-ietf-oauth-iss-auth-resp (oauth-parameters)
Amanda Baber via RT <drafts-expert-review-comment@iana.org> Tue, 04 January 2022 01:57 UTC
Return-Path: <iana-shared@icann.org>
X-Original-To: oauth-ext-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth-ext-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF9083A1405; Mon, 3 Jan 2022 17:57:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.628
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.628 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, MISSING_HEADERS=1.021, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id czj5SuxOcE7L; Mon, 3 Jan 2022 17:57:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp.lax.icann.org (smtp.lax.icann.org [IPv6:2620:0:2d0:201::1:81]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 526F83A13FE; Mon, 3 Jan 2022 17:57:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from request4.lax.icann.org (request1.lax.icann.org [10.32.11.221]) by smtp.lax.icann.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F49DE0A95; Tue, 4 Jan 2022 01:57:20 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by request4.lax.icann.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 5B366206F8; Tue, 4 Jan 2022 01:57:20 +0000 (UTC)
RT-Owner: amanda.baber
From: Amanda Baber via RT <drafts-expert-review-comment@iana.org>
Reply-To: drafts-expert-review-comment@iana.org
In-Reply-To: <rt-4.4.3-1907-1637090376-1238.1216703-9-0@icann.org>
References: <RT-Ticket-1216703@icann.org> <rt-4.4.3-1907-1637090376-1238.1216703-9-0@icann.org>
Message-ID: <rt-4.4.3-16701-1641261440-386.1216703-9-0@icann.org>
X-RT-Loop-Prevention: IANA
X-RT-Ticket: IANA #1216703
X-Managed-BY: RT 4.4.3 (http://www.bestpractical.com/rt/)
X-RT-Originator: amanda.baber@icann.org
CC: oauth@ietf.org, oauth-ext-review@ietf.org, ve7jtb@ve7jtb.com, nat@sakimura.org, michael.jones@microsoft.com, dick.hardt@gmail.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
X-RT-Original-Encoding: utf-8
Precedence: bulk
Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2022 01:57:20 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/oauth-ext-review/3KNeylq1oTRR4YZvsGrbQm-M09M>
Subject: [oauth-ext-review] [IANA #1216703] Expert Review for draft-ietf-oauth-iss-auth-resp (oauth-parameters)
X-BeenThere: oauth-ext-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: "Review of proposed IANA registrations for OAuth." <oauth-ext-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth-ext-review>, <mailto:oauth-ext-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/oauth-ext-review/>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth-ext-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-ext-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth-ext-review>, <mailto:oauth-ext-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2022 01:57:27 -0000
Attn: Michael, Nat, John and Dick (OAuth Authorization Server Metadata registry experts) Have you had a chance to review the request in this document? https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-oauth-iss-auth-resp/ Is approval from all four experts required? thanks, Amanda Baber IANA Operations Manager On Wed Nov 24 21:27:25 2021, amanda.baber wrote: > Attn: Michael, Nat, John and Dick (OAuth Authorization Server Metadata > registry experts) > > I'm resending a review request for a document that's listed on the > next IESG telechat. Can you get to this before 12/2? > > Please let us know if approval from all four experts is required. > > thanks, > > Amanda Baber > IANA Operations Manager > > On Tue Nov 16 21:09:23 2021, michelle.cotton wrote: > > Mailing List/Expert Review requested > > > > Attn: Michael, Nat, John and Dick (OAuth Authorization Server > > Metadata > > registry experts) > > > > As the designated experts for the OAuth Authorization Server Metadata > > registry, can you review the proposed registration in draft-oauth- > > iss- > > auth-resp for us? Please see: > > > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-oauth-iss-auth-resp/ > > > > A single, new registration is being requested: > > > > Metadata Name: authorization_response_iss_parameter_supported > > Metadata Description: Boolean value indicating whether the > > authorization server provides the iss parameter in the authorization > > response. > > Change Controller: IESG > > Reference: [ RFC-to-be; Section 3 ] > > > > If this is request is OK, when the IESG approves the document for > > publication, we'll make the registration at > > > > https://www.iana.org/assignments/oauth-parameters/ > > > > If you're the first expert to submit a review, please let us know > > whether you want us to wait for both reviewers to respond before we > > mark the document "IANA OK" (or send your comments to the authors, if > > the registrations aren't OK). > > > > The IESG has asked us to set a two-week deadline for registration > > reviews. The due date for this request is 2021-11-30. > > > > Thank you, > > > > Michelle Cotton > > IANA Services
- [oauth-ext-review] [IANA #1216703] Expert Review … Amanda Baber via RT
- Re: [oauth-ext-review] [IANA #1216703] Expert Rev… Rifaat Shekh-Yusef
- Re: [oauth-ext-review] [IANA #1216703] Expert Rev… Dick Hardt
- [oauth-ext-review] [IANA #1216703] Expert Review … Amanda Baber via RT
- Re: [oauth-ext-review] [IANA #1216703] Expert Rev… Dick Hardt
- [oauth-ext-review] [IANA #1216703] Expert Review … Amanda Baber via RT
- Re: [oauth-ext-review] [IANA #1216703] Expert Rev… Dick Hardt
- Re: [oauth-ext-review] [IANA #1216703] Expert Rev… Mike Jones