[oauth-ext-review] request to register RFC 6749's "Extensions Error"s

Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu> Mon, 14 October 2019 03:57 UTC

Return-Path: <kaduk@mit.edu>
X-Original-To: oauth-ext-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth-ext-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7443912008D for <oauth-ext-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 13 Oct 2019 20:57:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RObldqqY641f for <oauth-ext-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 13 Oct 2019 20:57:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from outgoing.mit.edu (outgoing-auth-1.mit.edu [18.9.28.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C3B8712001A for <oauth-ext-review@ietf.org>; Sun, 13 Oct 2019 20:57:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from kduck.mit.edu ([24.16.140.251]) (authenticated bits=56) (User authenticated as kaduk@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id x9E3vLbS012232 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for <oauth-ext-review@ietf.org>; Sun, 13 Oct 2019 23:57:24 -0400
Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2019 20:57:21 -0700
From: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
To: oauth-ext-review@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20191014035721.GD61805@kduck.mit.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.1 (2019-06-15)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/oauth-ext-review/4WaM6n6JetFsLI6_T9S8wNVqP74>
Subject: [oauth-ext-review] request to register RFC 6749's "Extensions Error"s
X-BeenThere: oauth-ext-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Review of proposed IANA registrations for OAuth." <oauth-ext-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth-ext-review>, <mailto:oauth-ext-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/oauth-ext-review/>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth-ext-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-ext-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth-ext-review>, <mailto:oauth-ext-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2019 03:57:27 -0000

RFC 6749 establishes the OAuth Extensions Error Registry
(https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6749#section-11.4) but includes only a
Registration Template and not initial registry contents.
I request that the error values from the base protocol spec (as listed,
from Sections 4.1.2.1, 4.2.2.1, 5.2, and 7.2) be listed in the registry,
with "usage location" determined from the corresponding section of the
document, change controller "IESG", and reference RFC 6749.  Advice for how
to list the "Protocol Extension" column is welcome; I am undecided between
leaving it empty and something like "OAuth 2.0 core protocol".

Thanks,

Ben