IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [oauth-ext-review] Proposal for a small extension to facilitate token management

Breno de Medeiros <breno@google.com> Wed, 13 May 2020 21:20 UTC

Return-Path: <breno@google.com>
X-Original-To: oauth-ext-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth-ext-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E63C3A0934 for <oauth-ext-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 May 2020 14:20:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -17.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, ENV_AND_HDR_SPF_MATCH=-0.5, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id A0y5QF-YNWZj for <oauth-ext-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 May 2020 14:20:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io1-xd35.google.com (mail-io1-xd35.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d35]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 32CA03A0932 for <oauth-ext-review@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 May 2020 14:20:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io1-xd35.google.com with SMTP id x5so701807ioh.6 for <oauth-ext-review@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 May 2020 14:20:43 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=T/+sKk4jvdgZ+/ic8Hjah72qpEgc492aID9zGjB8Chg=; b=e58fzQAQQEsQRAPmyluL6HH6t5up0U8ahofIgbSAYv1yd98p2LBqnhOtlkxQBW2POA g46FMpsVJfS5edp3KsZc78CHrIngsoF+EldN0kuN0bsD+omID8psTVgL6GG3VuqS6P1W 3MPdU4/2QHZM2zS4Io54bJk70zvraPAB/vX2u6YGdzLFPS16mWLuqhhUttd5LfmMLvzV DOBjniDuMRZTQxFMfJloxTlrSz9u0boLizbHV+aBfIQw5JRAgCA14okwO/nhEvTGrq3R ELbtb/9yx3ZrHyLPe5d0qAYo0bbRz+1doYQZ1om276yGjDZasssFYZZXIgOeI4M2GIL4 xEMg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=T/+sKk4jvdgZ+/ic8Hjah72qpEgc492aID9zGjB8Chg=; b=b0iX9QNjQ8YozLrMMzZ6xKcpWrLLp0gN44gZSJkvhfYbqoJVhNbqYqoj6BTIp/B4vS KeMjWKsXfhPE9PGkuPTq5HyaihMTKXkNRIvDYESJoNFaWG+4hvqe3B75jWSKG6TwtDX4 KmoF3zJySEoAgEYZm4PC1MKbkpqDUFTKtV5hscOzzecw2qOp8j356tSJSDUm5AQR7WH3 bb2g7NzB6D6IMcgzAPFtYeO5sD1WBfLWZiTRC+tB98QU2AU+GeLxHU1mpmwUXS7LK9jB 33VM2OuBWr4X7u9Hu28THVi4jTeq0Gc+rHVWaJxFRn2olfSfzfvdVb0pKki7DsLHMN2s EURw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuZSxUoZ+xWQanKvTVoks03XPEq2d63Xg+54tVzrgwyq1nSb7HQY XQRwOYRKeKz/bHhEZdUWaFQ2r+/9vnzQVu6iJqwaF5OH
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypJqO09LCfmToO8m65TLakeeksxve51PsAhh2iZKediCQ6zJJHgKv8JPGnWBr4EMFLKlvc2sN4mzrHolI8Tp0lQ=
X-Received: by 2002:a02:ccfb:: with SMTP id l27mr1364703jaq.89.1589404842501; Wed, 13 May 2020 14:20:42 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAAJ++qHe+phgmRUUzYv=Zj9YLFKh7x4Z+byZ=w_b=L4cC+-AHQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAAJ++qHe+phgmRUUzYv=Zj9YLFKh7x4Z+byZ=w_b=L4cC+-AHQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Breno de Medeiros <breno@google.com>
Date: Wed, 13 May 2020 14:20:30 -0700
Message-ID: <CAAJ++qH=HyfOzm8sVgc2L6Xg7zE8OAsMBWOCHCocTp4-KfjXGw@mail.gmail.com>
To: oauth-ext-review@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000000b258c05a58e2717"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/oauth-ext-review/E4XOp88fRp_NK2pQL1J1tM_lDRQ>
Subject: Re: [oauth-ext-review] Proposal for a small extension to facilitate token management
X-BeenThere: oauth-ext-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Review of proposed IANA registrations for OAuth." <oauth-ext-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth-ext-review>, <mailto:oauth-ext-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/oauth-ext-review/>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth-ext-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-ext-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth-ext-review>, <mailto:oauth-ext-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 May 2020 21:20:46 -0000

Any feedback?

On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 12:05 PM Breno de Medeiros <breno@google.com> wrote:

> In some situations we have encountered requests from clients to have more
> metadata associated with tokens to facilitate human comprehension and
> management.
>
> I would like to suggest the following extension parameters for IANA
> registration, respectively an additional optional request and response
> parameter in the OAuth2 token endpoint:
>
> token_description: Value is a quote-delimited, case-sensitive string
> including spaces. This is supposed to be a human-readable description of
> the token.
>
> And a matched response parameter:
>
> token_id: Value is base64 url-safe value representing a service-generated
> id.
>
> ASes that support token_description and/or token_id MAY return these as
> part of token introspection endpoint responses or MAY display these to end
> users if they provide a token management interface. Otherwise it is out of
> scope for the specification where token_description or token_id is made
> visible or available.
>
> ASes that support these parameters SHOULD publish for which grant types in
> the token endpoint they support these parameters.
>
> Waiting on your feedback,
>
> --
>
> --Breno
>


-- 

--Breno

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email