[oauth-ext-review] [IANA #1191719] expert review for draft-ietf-ace-oscore-profile-17 (oauth-parameters)

Amanda Baber via RT <drafts-expert-review-comment@iana.org> Tue, 23 March 2021 19:55 UTC

Return-Path: <iana-shared@icann.org>
X-Original-To: oauth-ext-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth-ext-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBBF53A13E3 for <oauth-ext-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Mar 2021 12:55:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.628
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.628 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, MISSING_HEADERS=1.021, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KNgabu2fSfeq for <oauth-ext-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Mar 2021 12:55:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.lax.icann.org (smtp.lax.icann.org [192.0.33.81]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6FBFA3A13D2 for <oauth-ext-review@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Mar 2021 12:55:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from request4.lax.icann.org (request1.lax.icann.org [10.32.11.221]) by smtp.lax.icann.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CB49E0FA0; Tue, 23 Mar 2021 19:55:34 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by request4.lax.icann.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 48C26204E6; Tue, 23 Mar 2021 19:55:34 +0000 (UTC)
RT-Owner: amanda.baber
From: "Amanda Baber via RT" <drafts-expert-review-comment@iana.org>
Reply-To: drafts-expert-review-comment@iana.org
In-Reply-To: <rt-4.4.3-21140-1616487327-1926.1191719-9-0@icann.org>
References: <RT-Ticket-1191719@icann.org> <rt-4.4.3-22207-1615946310-719.1191719-9-0@icann.org> <rt-4.4.3-22208-1615946559-966.1191719-9-0@icann.org> <VI1PR08MB26399CB1C84288EFCD7ED43EFA649@VI1PR08MB2639.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com> <rt-4.4.3-21140-1616487327-1926.1191719-9-0@icann.org>
Message-ID: <rt-4.4.3-8232-1616529334-1084.1191719-9-0@icann.org>
X-RT-Loop-Prevention: IANA
X-RT-Ticket: IANA #1191719
X-Managed-BY: RT 4.4.3 (http://www.bestpractical.com/rt/)
X-RT-Originator: amanda.baber@icann.org
CC: hannes.tschofenig@arm.com, oauth-ext-review@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
X-RT-Original-Encoding: utf-8
Precedence: bulk
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2021 19:55:34 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/oauth-ext-review/SdOh0oWXyaD1nN4-q-pNnxHDwGQ>
Subject: [oauth-ext-review] [IANA #1191719] expert review for draft-ietf-ace-oscore-profile-17 (oauth-parameters)
X-BeenThere: oauth-ext-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: "Review of proposed IANA registrations for OAuth." <oauth-ext-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth-ext-review>, <mailto:oauth-ext-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/oauth-ext-review/>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth-ext-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-ext-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth-ext-review>, <mailto:oauth-ext-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2021 19:55:39 -0000

Hi Hannes,

A response from Francesca Palombini:

===

The reasoning behind using "rs-client response" is that we were implicitly indicating the direction of the response (from the resource server to the client). We can definitely change to "client-rs response" if the expert and my co-authors agree that it's a better choice.

===

Best regards,

Amanda Baber
Lead IANA Services Specialist

On Tue Mar 23 08:15:27 2021, Hannes.Tschofenig@arm.com wrote:
> Hi Amanda,
> 
> I also reviewed the request for adding the nonce1, nonce2,
> ace_client_recipientid, and ace_server_recipientid parameters to the
> OAuth parameter registry.
> 
> I am only wondering about the names for the parameter location. The
> communication between the client and the resource server is typically
> referred to as the protected resource request and response.
> 
> In the IANA registration request the parameter location is called
> "client-rs request" while the response is called "rs-client response".
> I would have expected to see a "client-rs response" instead of the
> "rs-client response".
> 
> Ciao
> Hannes
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: oauth-ext-review <oauth-ext-review-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf
> Of Amanda Baber via RT
> Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2021 3:03 AM
> Cc: oauth-ext-review@ietf.org; Hannes Tschofenig
> <Hannes.Tschofenig@arm.com>
> Subject: [oauth-ext-review] [IANA #1191719] expert review for draft-
> ietf-ace-oscore-profile-17 (oauth-parameters)
> 
> Hi Hannes (cc: oauth-ext-review@ietf.org),
> 
> I have another review request for you. Can you look at these OAuth
> Parameter registrations for us by Wednesday the 24th? This document's
> on the IESG telechat agenda next week:
> 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-ace-oscore-profile
> 
> These are the registrations as they appear in the document:
> 
> 9.2.  OAuth Parameters Registry
> 
> The following registrations are done for the OAuth Parameters
> Registry following the procedure specified in section 11.2 of
> [RFC6749]:
> 
> o  Parameter name: nonce1
> o  Parameter usage location: client-rs request
> o  Change Controller: IESG
> o  Specification Document(s): [[this specification]]
> 
> o  Parameter name: nonce2
> o  Parameter usage location: rs-client response
> o  Change Controller: IESG
> o  Specification Document(s): [[this specification]]
> 
> o  Parameter name: ace_client_recipientid
> o  Parameter usage location: client-rs request
> o  Change Controller: IESG
> o  Specification Document(s): [[this specification]]
> 
> o  Parameter name: ace_server_recipientid
> o  Parameter usage location: rs-client response
> o  Change Controller: IESG
> o  Specification Document(s): [[this specification]]
> 
> thanks,
> 
> Amanda Baber
> Lead IANA Services Specialist
> 
> _______________________________________________
> oauth-ext-review mailing list
> oauth-ext-review@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth-ext-review
> IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are
> confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended
> recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose
> the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or
> copy the information in any medium. Thank you.