[oauth-ext-review] [IANA #1216703] Expert Review for draft-ietf-oauth-iss-auth-resp (oauth-parameters)

Amanda Baber via RT <drafts-expert-review-comment@iana.org> Fri, 07 January 2022 01:24 UTC

Return-Path: <iana-shared@icann.org>
X-Original-To: oauth-ext-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth-ext-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 271F63A0CE2; Thu, 6 Jan 2022 17:24:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.628
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.628 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, MISSING_HEADERS=1.021, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UQnQ_9cjj-X3; Thu, 6 Jan 2022 17:23:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp.lax.icann.org (smtp.lax.icann.org [IPv6:2620:0:2d0:201::1:81]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C1C273A0CE1; Thu, 6 Jan 2022 17:23:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from request4.lax.icann.org (request1.lax.icann.org [10.32.11.221]) by smtp.lax.icann.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8CD1E4041; Fri, 7 Jan 2022 01:23:56 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by request4.lax.icann.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id B47C82054F; Fri, 7 Jan 2022 01:23:56 +0000 (UTC)
RT-Owner: amanda.baber
From: Amanda Baber via RT <drafts-expert-review-comment@iana.org>
Reply-To: drafts-expert-review-comment@iana.org
In-Reply-To: <rt-4.4.3-10675-1641517956-867.1216703-9-0@icann.org>
References: <RT-Ticket-1216703@icann.org> <rt-4.4.3-1907-1637090376-1238.1216703-9-0@icann.org> <rt-4.4.3-16701-1641261440-386.1216703-9-0@icann.org> <CADNypP9Y5LEuEv+RMcRGOpQft5PLSvfF2JKEMy+dvAVos_S6hw@mail.gmail.com> <CAD9ie-thY2Zy2mUdTQCzgc2kMAnHP__QN5_dF5W0OnK6=P0E3Q@mail.gmail.com> <rt-4.4.3-1546-1641399261-1210.1216703-9-0@icann.org> <rt-4.4.3-10675-1641516407-1857.1216703-9-0@icann.org> <CAD9ie-uX8yNNxg7v-W_aq5pNbcZSbKRS42D961+hsS=XHx33Vg@mail.gmail.com> <rt-4.4.3-10675-1641517956-867.1216703-9-0@icann.org>
Message-ID: <rt-4.4.3-10675-1641518636-1037.1216703-9-0@icann.org>
X-RT-Loop-Prevention: IANA
X-RT-Ticket: IANA #1216703
X-Managed-BY: RT 4.4.3 (http://www.bestpractical.com/rt/)
X-RT-Originator: amanda.baber@icann.org
CC: dick.hardt@gmail.com, michael.jones@microsoft.com, nat@sakimura.org, oauth@ietf.org, oauth-ext-review@ietf.org, ve7jtb@ve7jtb.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
X-RT-Original-Encoding: utf-8
Precedence: bulk
Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2022 01:23:56 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/oauth-ext-review/XIg24Ao_plOxOFZznV6m6LQBifk>
Subject: [oauth-ext-review] [IANA #1216703] Expert Review for draft-ietf-oauth-iss-auth-resp (oauth-parameters)
X-BeenThere: oauth-ext-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: "Review of proposed IANA registrations for OAuth." <oauth-ext-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth-ext-review>, <mailto:oauth-ext-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/oauth-ext-review/>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth-ext-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-ext-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth-ext-review>, <mailto:oauth-ext-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2022 01:24:03 -0000

Hi,

On Fri Jan 07 01:12:36 2022, dick.hardt@gmail.com wrote:
> Unfortunately I don’t know what the approval process is — I don’t feel
> I
> need to discuss or review with the others — the IANA registration is
> pretty
> straightforward and I have not heard any controversy about it
> 
> I recall at least 2 of the other experts are aligned on the underlying
> spec.

It's up to the experts: some groups prefer explicit unanimous or majority approval, while others are OK with a single approval (sometimes depending on what's being registered). One group rotates approval duties on a monthly basis.

We can move forward with this if you're OK with giving us the go-ahead. For what it's worth, the initial approval request was sent in mid-November, and we haven't seen any other responses.

Should we make the registration now or wait for Michael, Nat, and John?

thanks,
Amanda 

> On Thu, Jan 6, 2022 at 6:46 PM Amanda Baber via RT <
> drafts-expert-review-comment@iana.org> wrote:
> 
> > Hi Dick,
> >
> > Should we wait for further approvals or proceed with the
> > registration? The
> > document has been approved by the IESG, so we can move ahead now once
> > one
> > or more experts instruct us to do so.
> >
> > thanks,
> > Amanda
> >
> > On Wed Jan 05 16:14:21 2022, dick.hardt@gmail.com wrote:
> > > I'm fine with the IANA registry update.
> > > ᐧ
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jan 4, 2022 at 7:19 AM Rifaat Shekh-Yusef <
> > rifaat.s.ietf@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Mike, Nat, John, Dick,
> > > >
> > > > Can you please take a look at this to allow us to make progress
> > > > with
> > this
> > > > document?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > >  Rifaat
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Jan 3, 2022 at 8:57 PM Amanda Baber via RT <
> > > > drafts-expert-review-comment@iana.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Attn: Michael, Nat, John and Dick (OAuth Authorization Server
> > > >> Metadata
> > > >> registry experts)
> > > >>
> > > >> Have you had a chance to review the request in this document?
> > > >>
> > > >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-oauth-iss-auth-resp/
> > > >>
> > > >> Is approval from all four experts required?
> > > >>
> > > >> thanks,
> > > >>
> > > >> Amanda Baber
> > > >> IANA Operations Manager
> > > >>
> > > >> On Wed Nov 24 21:27:25 2021, amanda.baber wrote:
> > > >> > Attn: Michael, Nat, John and Dick (OAuth Authorization Server
> > Metadata
> > > >> > registry experts)
> > > >> >
> > > >> > I'm resending a review request for a document that's listed on
> > > >> > the
> > > >> > next IESG telechat. Can you get to this before 12/2?
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Please let us know if approval from all four experts is
> > > >> > required.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > thanks,
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Amanda Baber
> > > >> > IANA Operations Manager
> > > >> >
> > > >> > On Tue Nov 16 21:09:23 2021, michelle.cotton wrote:
> > > >> > > Mailing List/Expert Review requested
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > Attn: Michael, Nat, John and Dick (OAuth Authorization
> > > >> > > Server
> > > >> > > Metadata
> > > >> > > registry experts)
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > As the designated experts for the OAuth Authorization Server
> > Metadata
> > > >> > > registry, can you review the proposed registration in draft-
> > > >> > > oauth-
> > > >> > > iss-
> > > >> > > auth-resp for us? Please see:
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-oauth-iss-auth-
> > > >> > > resp/
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > A single, new registration is being requested:
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > Metadata Name:
> > > >> > > authorization_response_iss_parameter_supported
> > > >> > > Metadata Description: Boolean value indicating whether the
> > > >> > > authorization server provides the iss parameter in the
> > authorization
> > > >> > > response.
> > > >> > > Change Controller: IESG
> > > >> > > Reference: [ RFC-to-be; Section 3 ]
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > If this is request is OK, when the IESG approves the
> > > >> > > document for
> > > >> > > publication, we'll make the registration at
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > https://www.iana.org/assignments/oauth-parameters/
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > If you're the first expert to submit a review, please let us
> > > >> > > know
> > > >> > > whether you want us to wait for both reviewers to respond
> > > >> > > before
> > we
> > > >> > > mark the document "IANA OK" (or send your comments to the
> > authors, if
> > > >> > > the registrations aren't OK).
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > The IESG has asked us to set a two-week deadline for
> > > >> > > registration
> > > >> > > reviews. The due date for this request is 2021-11-30.
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > Thank you,
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > Michelle Cotton
> > > >> > > IANA Services
> > > >>
> > > >> _______________________________________________
> > > >> oauth-ext-review mailing list
> > > >> oauth-ext-review@ietf.org
> > > >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth-ext-review
> > > >>
> > > >
> >
> >