Re: [oauth-ext-review] [IANA #1216704] Expert Review for draft-ietf-oauth-iss-auth-resp (oauth-parameters) (2)

Brian Campbell <bcampbell@pingidentity.com> Thu, 13 January 2022 21:29 UTC

Return-Path: <bcampbell@pingidentity.com>
X-Original-To: oauth-ext-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth-ext-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AA143A1453 for <oauth-ext-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Jan 2022 13:29:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=pingidentity.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PBDVrek9DfhB for <oauth-ext-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Jan 2022 13:29:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lf1-x12f.google.com (mail-lf1-x12f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::12f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 98B0E3A145C for <oauth-ext-review@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Jan 2022 13:29:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lf1-x12f.google.com with SMTP id bu18so1107154lfb.5 for <oauth-ext-review@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Jan 2022 13:29:53 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=pingidentity.com; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Fyc6s12rfPIh2QpT57LmEt5xuVnfMAVDodU9Os1RZ5Q=; b=HJBhCVrW988UyFIqW44JMfaljdgZQac/IG9NmxyZLWTEwnUuuaOkkdFKmLnqK9pKO9 SYKssHTSu/tXWf86O97EBM/Q9scuShvdp2Fq6uKVvJRD8o2ddQb2iaANBErjqrAogUaJ j2kLtzUAQC74CJEaDyvX5TkLbo3Zkxo67aXQcwZ4W1j+n1A3FTnOA7fIJ0dE7lKYgSSI lFRcLIWvyOGZfkQQiOJyG7XBwwDZ9GPHjE+mVWpMkSZtfBIngFMEsW0/tmX7YXx+UImj dCY0K28jixtfhDEVYT8MlqhwMIgel0D0REWE0yufdCwbjRu8jzPqj/rtzmT8iHiLd+za Wjgw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Fyc6s12rfPIh2QpT57LmEt5xuVnfMAVDodU9Os1RZ5Q=; b=piMjaI5TvKiVBPdxw6TnsK3mVCrtGIcp3STI5jqHtofbcEWuXLFREPuZUHpfpFMyOE xk05kkkEGu2Bv+s3A3rG5quCsD8qRYpZUco2K3pQysRMybFVNlR4WBtXsnrVW45Ij/pT 0jFNxaUw16sJ7w1b1W9NHnxsbg97zf152lYpRH1Prj+FUcTMq5eVhIfIhru2BglISu9Z +v+Ir98HZ1ev0HHfqqlR5mMee95mfNIwPf/adBF0NNArkYDLfpRp8aphmsjq4EafC2W0 ToYlb4SVww+/9MYG3Hoh33RTM/YRm9V5oaOArfdBSQM2Pc3UFoZFoHuRogh3o+gdpv+r /syQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532aHIq5JDgr/t96Oo7E+cJwcq3SWYRz9sQc1XveiR3o80psUJM4 sO6tC6Yx5inR4h0g1PdtYjdBGnHm6DNbh+TgcWjhfGQjVODwCIaXUNTD6bjM7jrXQc84TTpnm7D ugXOf1IpNok4diyxzqper25aDlX0r
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxUIrFejMAEiSCnRNvFlu1yZOgsJSnMRNsZqZCdI0B4cRiTtajRpHYyDYg0P8Wz+sUir0jkyvCPr3kEY6pKX0M=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:7a09:: with SMTP id v9mr4507354ljc.456.1642109390886; Thu, 13 Jan 2022 13:29:50 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <SJ0PR00MB10053CD86B3093A6AD248B29F5539@SJ0PR00MB1005.namprd00.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <SJ0PR00MB10053CD86B3093A6AD248B29F5539@SJ0PR00MB1005.namprd00.prod.outlook.com>
From: Brian Campbell <bcampbell@pingidentity.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2022 14:29:24 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+k3eCT1xK3paUKNtAZ5tswcc98Us_uWFN0HhyAeq+ZMht01Zw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Mike Jones <Michael.Jones=40microsoft.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: "drafts-expert-review-comment@iana.org" <drafts-expert-review-comment@iana.org>, "oauth-ext-review@ietf.org" <oauth-ext-review@ietf.org>, Hannes Tschofenig <Hannes.Tschofenig@arm.com>, "oauth@ietf.org" <oauth@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000ed466505d57d6275"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/oauth-ext-review/_67c5RzXUA9G3aR0bEZ3-BiU90I>
Subject: Re: [oauth-ext-review] [IANA #1216704] Expert Review for draft-ietf-oauth-iss-auth-resp (oauth-parameters) (2)
X-BeenThere: oauth-ext-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Review of proposed IANA registrations for OAuth." <oauth-ext-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth-ext-review>, <mailto:oauth-ext-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/oauth-ext-review/>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth-ext-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-ext-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth-ext-review>, <mailto:oauth-ext-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2022 21:29:59 -0000

Indeed, I believe that is exactly what the registration request in the
draft asks to do
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-oauth-iss-auth-resp-05.html#name-oauth-parameters-registrati

5.2.  OAuth Parameters Registration

   This specification updates the "iss" entry in the IANA "OAuth
   Parameters" registry of [IANA.OAuth.Parameters] established by
   [RFC6749].

   Parameter name:  "iss"
   Parameter usage location:  authorization request, authorization
      response
   Change Controller:  IETF
   Specification Document(s):  Section 2 of [[ this document ]],
      [RFC9101], and Section 4.1.1 of [RFC7519].

On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 7:29 PM Mike Jones <Michael.Jones=
40microsoft.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:

> Note that the requested OAuth parameter to be registered "iss" has already
> been registered by RFC 9101 (The OAuth 2.0 Authorization Framework:
> JWT-Secured Authorization Request (JAR)) for Parameter Usage Location
> "authorization request".  Fortunately, this use is compatible with that in
> draft-ietf-oauth-iss-auth-resp.
>
> I would be OK with draft-ietf-oauth-iss-auth-resp also registering it for
> usage "authorization response", as proposed in the draft, but the original
> registration for use "authorization request" by RFC 9191 should remain.
>
>                                 -- Mike
>
> P.S.  No, I'm not a designated expert for this registry.  Hannes is the
> only DE currently appointed by the IESG.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: oauth-ext-review <oauth-ext-review-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of
> Amanda Baber via RT
> Sent: Thursday, January 6, 2022 4:50 PM
> Cc: oauth-ext-review@ietf.org; Hannes Tschofenig <
> hannes.tschofenig@arm.com>; oauth@ietf.org
> Subject: [oauth-ext-review] [IANA #1216704] Expert Review for
> draft-ietf-oauth-iss-auth-resp (oauth-parameters) (2)
>
> Hi Hannes,
>
> Although the IESG has approved the document, we need expert approval in
> order to move forward with the registration, unless the ADs specifically
> tell us to move ahead without it. Can you approve the OAuth Parameter
> registration in this document?
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-oauth-iss-auth-resp/
>
> thanks,
> Amanda
>
> On Tue Jan 04 13:21:14 2022, rifaat.s.ietf@gmail.com wrote:
> > Hannes,
> >
> > Can you please take a look at this request to allow us to make
> > progress with this document?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >  Rifaat
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 3, 2022 at 8:58 PM Amanda Baber via RT <
> > drafts-expert-review-comment@iana.org> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Hannes,
> > >
> > > Have you had a chance to review the OAuth Parameters request in this
> > > document?
> > >
> > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-oauth-iss-auth-resp/
> > >
> > > thanks,
> > >
> > > Amanda Baber
> > > IANA Operations Manager
> > >
> > > On Wed Nov 24 21:28:18 2021, amanda.baber wrote:
> > > > Attn: Hannes (OAuth Parameters registry expert)
> > > >
> > > > I'm resending a review request for a document that's listed on the
> > > > next IESG telechat. Can you get to this before 12/2?
> > > >
> > > > thanks,
> > > >
> > > > Amanda Baber
> > > > IANA Operations Manager
> > > >
> > > > On Tue Nov 16 21:17:59 2021, michelle.cotton wrote:
> > > > > Mailing List/Expert Review requested
> > > > >
> > > > > Attn: Hannes (OAuth Parameters registry expert)
> > > > >
> > > > > As the designated expert for the OAuth Parameters registry, can
> > > > > you review the proposed registration in draft-oauth-iss-auth-resp
> for us?
> > > > > Please see:
> > > > >
> > > > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-oauth-iss-auth-resp/
> > > > >
> > > > > A single, new registration is being requested:
> > > > >
> > > > > Name: iss
> > > > > Parameter Usage Location: authorization response Change
> > > > > Controller: IESG
> > > > > Reference: [ RFC-to-be; Section 2 ]
> > > > >
> > > > > If this is request is OK, when the IESG approves the document
> > > > > for publication, we'll make the registration at
> > > > >
> > > > > https://www.iana.org/assignments/oauth-parameters/
> > > > >
> > > > > The IESG has asked us to set a two-week deadline for
> > > > > registration reviews. The due date for this request is 2021-11-30.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thank you,
> > > > >
> > > > > Michelle Cotton
> > > > > IANA Services
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > oauth-ext-review mailing list
> > > oauth-ext-review@ietf.org
> > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth-ext-review
> > >
>
> _______________________________________________
> oauth-ext-review mailing list
> oauth-ext-review@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth-ext-review
>
> _______________________________________________
> oauth-ext-review mailing list
> oauth-ext-review@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth-ext-review
>

-- 
_CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email may contain confidential and privileged 
material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review, use, 
distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited.  If you have 
received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately 
by e-mail and delete the message and any file attachments from your 
computer. Thank you._