Re: [oauth-ext-review] [IANA #1158951] Requested review for IANA registration in draft-ietf-ace-oauth-authz (oauth-parameters - OAuth Extensions Error, OAuth Access Token Types, OAuth Parameters, OAuth Token Introspection Response)

Justin Richer <jricher@mit.edu> Tue, 11 February 2020 04:02 UTC

Return-Path: <jricher@mit.edu>
X-Original-To: oauth-ext-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth-ext-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0812C1200FD for <oauth-ext-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Feb 2020 20:02:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tKkTwkR9HIBp for <oauth-ext-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Feb 2020 20:02:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from outgoing.mit.edu (outgoing-auth-1.mit.edu [18.9.28.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CD50A1200F6 for <oauth-ext-review@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Feb 2020 20:02:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.7] (static-71-174-62-56.bstnma.fios.verizon.net [71.174.62.56]) (authenticated bits=0) (User authenticated as jricher@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 01B42Wcv004519 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 10 Feb 2020 23:02:33 -0500
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
From: Justin Richer <jricher@mit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <rt-4.4.3-12231-1581114192-1156.1158951-9-0@icann.org>
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2020 23:02:32 -0500
Cc: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>, Ludwig Seitz <ludwig_seitz@gmx.de>, Jim Schaad <ietf@augustcellars.com>, daniel.migault@ericsson.com, oauth-ext-review@ietf.org, "rdd@cert.org" <rdd@cert.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <14680AE8-6C0A-4C2B-991E-DD315919D208@mit.edu>
References: <RT-Ticket-1158951@icann.org> <ef9a0ed1-93cd-1a0e-35d7-95d0710aebc4@gmx.de> <rt-4.4.3-14492-1578437402-751.1158951-37-0@icann.org> <9586C47C-49E4-402F-B07C-CCC64CA6291C@mit.edu> <rt-4.4.3-28520-1578518201-554.1158951-37-0@icann.org> <rt-4.4.3-5793-1580838010-73.1158951-37-0@icann.org> <6a79061f2fd44bd7999759bf9e7fa296@combitech.se> <rt-4.4.3-1116-1581061979-111.1158951-9-0@icann.org> <rt-4.4.3-12231-1581114192-1156.1158951-9-0@icann.org>
To: drafts-expert-review-comment@iana.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/oauth-ext-review/rCqQaqZPTmpdIn3Xv0sZNIldYa4>
Subject: Re: [oauth-ext-review] [IANA #1158951] Requested review for IANA registration in draft-ietf-ace-oauth-authz (oauth-parameters - OAuth Extensions Error, OAuth Access Token Types, OAuth Parameters, OAuth Token Introspection Response)
X-BeenThere: oauth-ext-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Review of proposed IANA registrations for OAuth." <oauth-ext-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth-ext-review>, <mailto:oauth-ext-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/oauth-ext-review/>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth-ext-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-ext-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth-ext-review>, <mailto:oauth-ext-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2020 04:02:49 -0000

Looks good, thank you for the updates.

 — Justin

> On Feb 7, 2020, at 5:23 PM, Sabrina Tanamal via RT <drafts-expert-review-comment@iana.org> wrote:
> 
> Hi Justin, 
> 
> As the OAuth Token Introspection Response expert, are you OK with version -33 of this document? 
> 
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ace-oauth-authz-33#section-8.10
> 
> Thanks,
> Sabrina
> 
> 
> On Fri Feb 07 07:52:59 2020, ludwig.seitz@combitech.se wrote:
>> Hello IANA,
>> 
>> Version -33 of the draft addresses this comment.
>> 
>> Thank you for your patience.
>> 
>> 
>> Regards,
>> 
>> Ludwig
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Sabrina Tanamal via RT <drafts-expert-review@iana.org>
>> Sent: den 4 februari 2020 18:40
>> Cc: Seitz Ludwig <ludwig.seitz@combitech.se>se>;
>> goran.selander@ericsson.com; erik@wahlstromstekniska.se;
>> erdtman@spotify.com; hannes.tschofenig@arm.com;
>> ietf@augustcellars.com; daniel.migault@ericsson.com; rdd@cert.org;
>> kaduk@mit.edu
>> Subject: [IANA #1158951] Requested review for IANA registration in
>> draft-ietf-ace-oauth-authz (oauth-parameters - OAuth Extensions Error,
>> OAuth Access Token Types, OAuth Parameters, OAuth Token Introspection
>> Response)
>> 
>> Dear Authors,
>> 
>> Have you had a chance to review the expert's comment below?
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> 
>> Sabrina Tanamal
>> Senior IANA Services Specialist
>> 
>> On Wed Jan 08 21:16:41 2020, jricher@mit.edu wrote:
>>> The registration request is missing the “cnonce” and “exi" claims,
>>> both of which are mentioned in 5.7.2 but aren’t listed in the
>>> registry
>>> request. If those are added then I think the registration is fine.
>>> 
>>> — Justin
>>> 
>>>> On Jan 7, 2020, at 5:50 PM, Amanda Baber via RT <drafts-expert-
>>>> review@iana.org> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Hi Justin, all,
>>>> 
>>>> Because Hannes is both an author and the sole designated expert for
>>>> the registries named in Sections 8.2, 8.5, and 8.8, Ben is
>>>> reviewing
>>>> those registrations for us. Of the sections listed below, we only
>>>> need Justin to review this one:
>>>> 
>>>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ace-oauth-authz-29#section-
>>>> 8.10
>>>> 
>>>> We've sent Ben's questions/comments to the authors and chairs.
>>>> 
>>>> Best regards,
>>>> 
>>>> Amanda Baber
>>>> Lead IANA Services Specialist
>>>> 
>>>> On Sat Dec 21 11:33:52 2019, ludwig_seitz@gmx.de wrote:
>>>>> Hello OAuth registry reviewers,
>>>>> 
>>>>> the IESG-designated experts for the OAuth parameters registry have
>>>>> asked me to send a review request to you about the OAuth
>>>>> parameters
>>>>> registered
>>>>> here:
>>>>> 
>>>>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ace-oauth-authz-29#section-
>>>>> 8.2
>>>>> 
>>>>> and here:
>>>>> 
>>>>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ace-oauth-authz-29#section-
>>>>> 8.5
>>>>> 
>>>>> and here:
>>>>> 
>>>>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ace-oauth-authz-29#section-
>>>>> 8.8
>>>>> 
>>>>> and here:
>>>>> 
>>>>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ace-oauth-authz-29#section-
>>>>> 8.10
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thank you in advance for you review comments.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> 
>>>>> Ludwig
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> oauth-ext-review mailing list
>>>> oauth-ext-review@ietf.org
>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth-ext-review
>> 
>