[OAUTH-WG] Barry Leiba's No Objection on draft-ietf-oauth-resource-indicators-05: (with COMMENT)

[Barry Leiba via Datatracker <[e-mail]>]

Barry Leiba has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-oauth-resource-indicators-05: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-oauth-resource-indicators/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

-- Section 2 --

   invalid_target
      The requested resource is invalid, unknown, or malformed.

For clarity, I suggest adding "missing" to the list, as specified in Section
2.1, '...and MAY fail requests that omit the parameter with an "invalid_target"
error.'

   The authorization server SHOULD audience restrict issued access
   tokens to the resource(s) indicated by the "resource" parameter.

I can't parse this sentence.  I see "audience" as a verb, and don't understand.
AH.  I read later in the document and figured out my problem: I think it would
help if you hyphenate "audience-restrict" (and "audience-restricted" later). 
No?