Re: [OAUTH-WG] WGLC on Pushed Authorization Requests draft

A couple of WGLC comments from my sphere.

I'd like to take the discussion of the first item in
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/oauth/iD33QbZTj92LJ6M9wNUq9s3nLpA/ as
a suggestion that the top part of section 2.1
<https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-oauth-par-03.html#section-2.1> be
reworked or adjusted so as to (hopefully) avoid any confusion that the list
there somehow conveys normative requirements.

The definition of the client require_pushed_authorization_
<https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-oauth-par-03.html#section-6>requests
metadata parameter
<https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-oauth-par-03.html#section-6-2.2> needs
to specify a default similar to how the AS metadata parameter of the same
name <https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-oauth-par-03.html#section-5-2.4>
does - i.e., "If omitted, the default value is false."

On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 4:08 PM Rifaat Shekh-Yusef <rifaat.s.ietf@gmail.com>
wrote:

> All,
>
> This is a WGLC on the *Pushed Authorization Requests *document:
> https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-oauth-par-03.html
>
> Please, take a look and provide feedback on the list by *August 25th.*
>
> Regards,
>  Rifaat & Hannes
>
> _______________________________________________
> OAuth mailing list
> OAuth@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
>

-- 
_CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email may contain confidential and privileged 
material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review, use, 
distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited.  If you have 
received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately 
by e-mail and delete the message and any file attachments from your 
computer. Thank you._