Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for Adoption: Stateless Client Identifier for OAuth 2

Roland Hedberg <roland.hedberg@umu.se> Sun, 07 February 2016 20:08 UTC

Return-Path: <roland.hedberg@umu.se>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EC7F1A1B8E for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 7 Feb 2016 12:08:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.851
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.851 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bFuzUcp0OtGr for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 7 Feb 2016 12:08:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp5.umu.se (smtp5.umu.se [130.239.8.142]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06F6F1A1B92 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Sun, 7 Feb 2016 12:08:03 -0800 (PST)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.22,412,1449529200"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="86298583"
X-IPAS-Result: A2CoBAABo7dW/8oN74JdGQEBAQEPAQEBAYJffW0GiFWycwQFFwqFbAKBawEBAQEBAYEAC4RBAQEBAQIBAQEBGgZLCwUHBAIBCBEEAQEBJwMCAicLFAkIAgQOBQ6IBQgBAwquTI42AQEBAQEBAQECAQEBAQEBAQEBAQENBASGEoFtgkqEODKCSCuBDwWWdYJ+gWRqiV+EQ4hVjj5ig2Rqh1cBewEBAQ
Received: from umu-ex02.ad.umu.se (HELO mail.ad.umu.se) ([130.239.13.202]) by smtp5.umu.se with ESMTP; 07 Feb 2016 21:08:02 +0100
Received: from UMU-EX03.ad.umu.se (2002:82ef:dcb::82ef:dcb) by UMU-EX02.ad.umu.se (2002:82ef:dca::82ef:dca) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1130.7; Sun, 7 Feb 2016 21:07:56 +0100
Received: from UMU-EX03.ad.umu.se ([fe80::708f:f02f:c850:d133]) by UMU-EX03.ad.umu.se ([fe80::708f:f02f:c850:d133%24]) with mapi id 15.00.1130.005; Sun, 7 Feb 2016 21:07:56 +0100
From: Roland Hedberg <roland.hedberg@umu.se>
To: "oauth@ietf.org" <oauth@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [OAUTH-WG] Call for Adoption: Stateless Client Identifier for OAuth 2
Thread-Index: AQHRYeM7Ld1H+TFtgkWTTYHb8L4+Cg==
Date: Sun, 7 Feb 2016 20:07:55 +0000
Message-ID: <27468C38-9A52-4A3C-94BE-C37973739831@adm.umu.se>
References: <569E265D.2080703@gmx.net> <BY2PR03MB4429FB6A760EC392399B77BF5D10@BY2PR03MB442.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> <FAFA2AA7-B06F-4062-AADF-7940C986A06B@ve7jtb.com> <56B5DC45.5080407@lodderstedt.net> <CAAP42hD7wNRYaZfJgvdNY5zRgPWEV3rgjTtDNZa1gnMN1xL+SA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAAP42hD7wNRYaZfJgvdNY5zRgPWEV3rgjTtDNZa1gnMN1xL+SA@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US, sv-SE
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-pgp-agent: GPGMail 2.5.2
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [31.208.6.237]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_0138F7DA-F8B2-479D-8374-01F6628ECBF1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha256
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/oauth/0AzC7FPKh73U6CDfJPh5sj0grik>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for Adoption: Stateless Client Identifier for OAuth 2
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/oauth/>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Feb 2016 20:08:07 -0000

+1

> 6 feb 2016 kl. 19:56 skrev William Denniss <wdenniss@google.com>om>:
> 
> +1 to adopt.
> 
> I don't think we're planning to use this, but it looks useful and doesn't harm interoperability so I support it.
> 
> On Sat, Feb 6, 2016 at 3:43 AM, Torsten Lodderstedt <torsten@lodderstedt.net> wrote:
> +1
> 
> 
> Am 04.02.2016 um 17:37 schrieb John Bradley:
> I support it.
> 
> I have always thought of this as informational.  It is not the only way to do it, and has no real interoperability impact.
> 
> John B.
> On Feb 4, 2016, at 3:29 AM, Mike Jones <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com> wrote:
> 
> I support adoption of this document by the working group as either an experimental or information specification.
> 
>                                 -- Mike
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: OAuth [mailto:oauth-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Hannes Tschofenig
> Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2016 4:05 AM
> To: oauth@ietf.org
> Subject: [OAUTH-WG] Call for Adoption: Stateless Client Identifier for OAuth 2
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> this is the call for adoption of Stateless Client Identifier for OAuth 2, see
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bradley-oauth-stateless-client-id-02
> 
> Please let us know by Feb 2nd whether you accept / object to the adoption of this document as a starting point for work in the OAuth working group.
> 
> Ciao
> Hannes & Derek
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OAuth mailing list
> OAuth@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
> _______________________________________________
> OAuth mailing list
> OAuth@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OAuth mailing list
> OAuth@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OAuth mailing list
> OAuth@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth

”Everybody should be quiet near a little stream and listen."
From ’Open House for Butterflies’ by Ruth Krauss