Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Re-Chartering
Eran Hammer <eran@hueniverse.com> Thu, 15 March 2012 15:01 UTC
Return-Path: <eran@hueniverse.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7B7E21F8652 for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 08:01:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.537
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.537 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.062, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id l5Qk6mvVF952 for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 08:01:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p3plex1out02.prod.phx3.secureserver.net (p3plex1out02.prod.phx3.secureserver.net [72.167.180.18]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 7027921F8732 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 08:01:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 30974 invoked from network); 15 Mar 2012 15:01:07 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO p3plex2out01.prod.phx3.secureserver.net) (184.168.131.12) by p3plex1out02.prod.phx3.secureserver.net with SMTP; 15 Mar 2012 15:01:07 -0000
Received: from P3PW5EX1HT002.EX1.SECURESERVER.NET ([72.167.180.20]) by p3plex2out01.prod.phx3.secureserver.net with bizsmtp id lr161i0040SoFT401r17BU; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 08:01:07 -0700
Received: from P3PW5EX1MB01.EX1.SECURESERVER.NET ([10.6.135.20]) by P3PW5EX1HT002.EX1.SECURESERVER.NET ([72.167.180.20]) with mapi; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 08:00:20 -0700
From: Eran Hammer <eran@hueniverse.com>
To: "Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo)" <hannes.tschofenig@nsn.com>, ext Blaine Cook <romeda@gmail.com>, Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 08:00:11 -0700
Thread-Topic: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Re-Chartering
Thread-Index: Ac0CnzJzNsQfN7a4RL6KgAEUAk1PowAAfdrQAAbBvTA=
Message-ID: <90C41DD21FB7C64BB94121FBBC2E723453AFF089FE@P3PW5EX1MB01.EX1.SECURESERVER.NET>
References: <B327D847-B059-41D7-A468-8B8A5DB8BFCE@gmx.net> <CAAz=scnGaFzNNHv1xEQa0hCiA2gup_J_86HyzCnd7P0YTqfFxw@mail.gmail.com> <999913AB42CC9341B05A99BBF358718D01382ADC@FIESEXC035.nsn-intra.net>
In-Reply-To: <999913AB42CC9341B05A99BBF358718D01382ADC@FIESEXC035.nsn-intra.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "oauth@ietf.org" <oauth@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Re-Chartering
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 15:01:09 -0000
I believe most do, except for the dynamic client registration. I don't have strong objections to it, but it is the least important and least defined / deployed proposal on the list. The AS->RS work is probably simpler and more useful at this point. EH > -----Original Message----- > From: oauth-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:oauth-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf > Of Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo) > Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2012 4:47 AM > To: ext Blaine Cook; Hannes Tschofenig > Cc: oauth@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Re-Chartering > > Hi Blaine, > > These are indeed good requirements you stated below. > > When you look at the list of topics do you think that the proposed items > indeed fulfill them? > > Ciao > Hannes > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: oauth-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:oauth-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf > > Of ext Blaine Cook > > Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2012 1:31 PM > > To: Hannes Tschofenig > > Cc: oauth@ietf.org WG > > Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Re-Chartering > > > > On 14 March 2012 20:21, Hannes Tschofenig > <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net> > > wrote: > > > So, here is a proposal: > > > > > > [Editor's Note: New work for the group. 5 items maximum! ] > > > > > > Aug. 2012 Submit 'Token Revocation' to the IESG for consideration > > as a Proposed Standard > > > Nov. 2012 Submit 'JSON Web Token (JWT)' to the IESG for > > consideration as a Proposed Standard > > > Nov. 2012 Submit 'JSON Web Token (JWT) Bearer Token Profiles for > > OAuth 2.0' to the IESG for consideration > > > Jan. 2013 Submit 'OAuth Dynamic Client Registration Protocol' to > > the IESG for consideration as a Proposed Standard > > > Sep. 2012 Submit 'OAuth Use Cases' to the IESG for consideration > > as an Informational RFC > > > > This looks great to me. > > > > I have serious concerns about feature-creep, and think that the OAuth > > WG should strongly limit its purview to these issues. In general, I > > think it prudent for this working group in particular to consider > > standardisation of work only under the following criteria: > > > > 1. Proposals must have a direct relationship to the mechanism of OAuth > > (and not, specifically, bound to an application-level protocol). > > 2. Proposals must have significant adoption in both enterprise and > > startup environments. > > 3. Any proposal must be driven based on a consideration of the > > different approaches, as adopted in the wild, and strive to be a > > better synthesis of those approaches, not a means to an end. > > > > These are the constraints with which I started the OAuth project, and > > they're more relevant than ever. I'd hate to see OAuth fail in the end > > because of a WS-*-like death by standards-pile-on. > > > > b. > > _______________________________________________ > > OAuth mailing list > > OAuth@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth > _______________________________________________ > OAuth mailing list > OAuth@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
- [OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Re-Chartering Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Re-Chartering Igor Faynberg
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Re-Chartering Eran Hammer
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Re-Chartering Richer, Justin P.
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Re-Chartering Mike Jones
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Re-Chartering Eran Hammer
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Re-Chartering Richer, Justin P.
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Re-Chartering Eran Hammer
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Re-Chartering Anthony Nadalin
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Re-Chartering Eran Hammer
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Re-Chartering Nat Sakimura
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Re-Chartering Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo)
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Re-Chartering Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo)
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Re-Chartering Paul Madsen
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Re-Chartering John Bradley
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Re-Chartering Paul Madsen
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Re-Chartering Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo)
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Re-Chartering John Bradley
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Re-Chartering Blaine Cook
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Re-Chartering Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo)
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Re-Chartering Paul Madsen
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Re-Chartering Richer, Justin P.
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Re-Chartering Paul Madsen
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Re-Chartering Eran Hammer
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Re-Chartering Zeltsan, Zachary (Zachary)
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Re-Chartering Mike Jones
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Re-Chartering Blaine Cook
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Re-Chartering John Bradley
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Re-Chartering Phil Hunt
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Re-Chartering John Bradley
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Re-Chartering Torsten Lodderstedt
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Re-Chartering Torsten Lodderstedt
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Re-Chartering Torsten Lodderstedt
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Re-Chartering John Bradley
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Re-Chartering Eran Hammer
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Re-Chartering George Fletcher
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Re-Chartering Torsten Lodderstedt
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Re-Chartering Torsten Lodderstedt
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Re-Chartering John Bradley
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Re-Chartering George Fletcher
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Re-Chartering Mike Jones
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Re-Chartering Phil Hunt
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Re-Chartering Eran Hammer
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Re-Chartering John Bradley
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Re-Chartering Phil Hunt
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Re-Chartering Mike Jones
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Re-Chartering Justin Richer
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Re-Chartering Phil Hunt