[OAUTH-WG] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7591 (6619)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Tue, 22 June 2021 18:47 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C3AA3A128B for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Jun 2021 11:47:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.202
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.202 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, CTE_8BIT_MISMATCH=0.998, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BprZeBQ3mdub for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Jun 2021 11:47:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 324BB3A128C for <oauth@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Jun 2021 11:47:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id BFAFDF40817; Tue, 22 Jun 2021 11:47:26 -0700 (PDT)
To: ietf@justin.richer.org, mbj@microsoft.com, ve7jtb@ve7jtb.com, maciej.machulak@gmail.com, phil.hunt@yahoo.com, rdd@cert.org, kaduk@mit.edu, Hannes.Tschofenig@gmx.net, rifaat.s.ietf@gmail.com
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: disaacs@surveymonkey.com, oauth@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20210622184726.BFAFDF40817@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2021 11:47:26 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/oauth/0ylPWM74_k3YxJvmW2Bt9nlE1v8>
Subject: [OAUTH-WG] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7591 (6619)
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/oauth/>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2021 18:47:39 -0000
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7591, "OAuth 2.0 Dynamic Client Registration Protocol". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6619 -------------------------------------- Type: Editorial Reported by: Dave Isaacs <disaacs@surveymonkey.com> Section: 2 Original Text ------------- token_endpoint_auth_method String indicator of the requested authentication method for the token endpoint. Values defined by this specification are: * "none": The client is a public client as defined in OAuth 2.0, Section 2.1, and does not have a client secret. * "client_secret_post": The client uses the HTTP POST parameters as defined in OAuth 2.0, Section 2.3.1. * "client_secret_basic": The client uses HTTP Basic as defined in OAuth 2.0, Section 2.3.1. Corrected Text -------------- Text unchanged. It is the links that are incorrect. Notes ----- The links that are present in each bullet—to Section 2.1, and to Section 2.3.1 (twice)—link internally to the current RFC (RFC 7591) when they are supposed to link to the OAuth 2.0 RFC (RFC 6749). Instructions: ------------- This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC7591 (draft-ietf-oauth-dyn-reg-30) -------------------------------------- Title : OAuth 2.0 Dynamic Client Registration Protocol Publication Date : July 2015 Author(s) : J. Richer, Ed., M. Jones, J. Bradley, M. Machulak, P. Hunt Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Web Authorization Protocol Area : Security Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [OAUTH-WG] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7591 (6… RFC Errata System
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC759… John R. Levine
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC759… Benjamin Kaduk
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC759… John R. Levine