Re: [OAUTH-WG] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6749 (3446)

Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> Tue, 08 January 2013 02:11 UTC

Return-Path: <barryleiba.mailing.lists@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28B4B21F8681 for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Jan 2013 18:11:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.205
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.205 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.228, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LAY1lKy3LSxP for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Jan 2013 18:11:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-vc0-f181.google.com (mail-vc0-f181.google.com [209.85.220.181]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F6DE21F8645 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 Jan 2013 18:11:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-vc0-f181.google.com with SMTP id gb30so19953562vcb.26 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Mon, 07 Jan 2013 18:11:33 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=10D5ZTbFVX8DvkrOWObKGlzgtNNmG+H9YbNWYFZh0nU=; b=qmgzpZ7VvaYX3Q32UxBgWJ8Pnhz087O+lx4k28gdBAjxMC9It7pZWyhto4ZLGrqnGj O444MgQiY7Vat+9f0oaLbD6/0vvm1f9WPeP3RM4QsT39+kk4C2iILMQtiggdQMFxkWYz fBvLxSN61MBuWBivTx9ZiNsAaJl6oemahy/GkUdimYTO5O172AW9AK/RiRgZSH06kyoT MK2+454jqPUevmSdoQc7nthqAY0SefdZ6a+vpAnCFAHbqB4w+j8GEtXqoLNjUjXlhzME E60hueUlPnC3x7cnYOQqPv55apVNBn9Yedx6YC7vU3TW4ckur3rjpvnad5bPPth8g91N s0Ig==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.52.88.33 with SMTP id bd1mr73474209vdb.70.1357611093809; Mon, 07 Jan 2013 18:11:33 -0800 (PST)
Sender: barryleiba.mailing.lists@gmail.com
Received: by 10.59.3.41 with HTTP; Mon, 7 Jan 2013 18:11:33 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20130108011935.22098B1E007@rfc-editor.org>
References: <20130108011935.22098B1E007@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2013 21:11:33 -0500
X-Google-Sender-Auth: j2W2HG_q9hXjXLIgY7zP1WgXbNg
Message-ID: <CAC4RtVAZmodp_qHFj46fQc85FQCrBoiMGk2xOwHhcTh286zPyw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
To: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Cc: nov@matake.jp, Derek Atkins <derek@ihtfp.com>, OAuth WG <oauth@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6749 (3446)
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2013 02:11:35 -0000

> Corrected Text
> --------------
> Resource owners cannot revoke access to an individual third party without revoking access
> to all third parties, and must do so by changing their password.
>
> Notes
> -----
> The text was originally "their" but changed to "the third party's" between the last draft and RFC.
> However, "their" means "resource owners'", not "the third party's".

Yes, this appears to be a change the RFC Editor made that the authors
didn't notice in AUTH48.  But the RFC Editor change it from "their"
because "their" wasn't clear.  Changing it back to "their" won't help
that.  I suggest editing the corrected text to "by changing the
resource owner's password" before marking this as Verified.

Barry