[OAUTH-WG] FIDO acr values

William Denniss <wdenniss@google.com> Wed, 20 January 2016 06:39 UTC

Return-Path: <wdenniss@google.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C15881A7030 for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Jan 2016 22:39:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.379
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.379 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FjcLVFk9rl0P for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Jan 2016 22:39:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ob0-x22a.google.com (mail-ob0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C76BB1A702F for <oauth@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Jan 2016 22:39:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ob0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id py5so239296638obc.2 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Jan 2016 22:39:53 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=1k2qcAkAtHDfR0aJMrTCEPMAS7uQg6oG/ebI/uFBr/g=; b=hWfJHI8bHMGK8ewgDzBBxamJESMZ+RHJboLDbKtlAGgOQCSZijWt8ieDi/wCwZ7B3E Yhp1Yig9IQryNds6BVkcI+7SrbD9WMpkhsmMa6m81zxvcyiNpUsbgIXGpWtUbeNLNt/8 Y4ik9CtXxQzzwGQldRtskeUKMylqkR7oh/AdkG7Udoj4zEzQnureiHnZpcwC2QSM6ln6 saNp1iw/0BSf5MlW7RwHdU7/IiFjWhTItRcwb0nEQzGyaeEatjRR5sMq+co05cs8GtT4 B7z0mMQwZHGwWwZbVhcGtrUHyJvsIX8QrZttrpboN57ra0ynpACuy6H0Oj6us8y29hoh 5AxQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=1k2qcAkAtHDfR0aJMrTCEPMAS7uQg6oG/ebI/uFBr/g=; b=hCANIlwQNEtAbGqY/My6vXYx+3FQdHDuyY3QHzhsnDdGJez7EJm/g0NHoVdkGFhZAh XcPvTjG7Hru2bvCV1zihM8VGcGMxYZ1tsbPEQBcNovH+OSRUG5HnMtjMHSI2XVz68pBs SuLEIBbecMptgMqdNaTn0jRNaAml7Wa/lhYbLAK9W5627M0DU73L7y+eAJ82cuxyKpMz McoD9xaofuJzSAQpsJ9SWopkxXA2K+RuujEJLAbxh9+ejCGzJWi++EYnU82KH7rmlL0g 9UOW/0DsOK72vIhlzJpbS0V2TdcokaFPkYaMANTUZ7cyqCKgofuZjynF4fRcs+ENAXlR eGcw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQm5msZHD9/WTzAZMMZg4t2dlFcEAEbQUtddpSbxvHrRIktAxP9Owc7ESgT0WuEIpMZnL8nNLTJTNrhPSpIqwY8+cYY21UoPvCvPC22aR6xbmz7cuiE=
X-Received: by 10.60.51.70 with SMTP id i6mr27406539oeo.3.1453271993125; Tue, 19 Jan 2016 22:39:53 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.182.227.39 with HTTP; Tue, 19 Jan 2016 22:39:28 -0800 (PST)
From: William Denniss <wdenniss@google.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2016 14:39:28 +0800
Message-ID: <CAAP42hBiRnNtPwNwGCfmV=0Fcjep=NT5JZ2Ci4dppA_V=rCf5w@mail.gmail.com>
To: "oauth@ietf.org" <oauth@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c301cce9e2090529be4094
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/oauth/2NbgqaqXkTTvegub3egehsxDSbc>
Subject: [OAUTH-WG] FIDO acr values
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/oauth/>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2016 06:39:54 -0000

I realised when reviewing
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jones-oauth-amr-values-03#page-5 that we
have not represented FIDO's "u2f" and "uaf". Should we add those?