Re: [OAUTH-WG] Basic signature support in the core specification

Eve Maler <eve@xmlgrrl.com> Fri, 24 September 2010 20:37 UTC

Return-Path: <eve@xmlgrrl.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90FB23A691F for <oauth@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Sep 2010 13:37:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.908
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.908 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.385, BAYES_00=-2.599, FROM_DOMAIN_NOVOWEL=0.5, SARE_URI_CONS7=0.306, URI_NOVOWEL=0.5]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UOg8EeIB51qj for <oauth@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Sep 2010 13:37:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.promanage-inc.com (eliasisrael.com [98.111.84.13]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BF023A6802 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Sep 2010 13:37:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.168.198] ([192.168.168.198]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.promanage-inc.com (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o8OKbdS6023443 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 24 Sep 2010 13:37:40 -0700
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Eve Maler <eve@xmlgrrl.com>
In-Reply-To: <C8C15057.3AC64%eran@hueniverse.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2010 13:37:39 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <09403564-A165-4372-AE90-894BFD1AF35B@xmlgrrl.com>
References: <C8C15057.3AC64%eran@hueniverse.com>
To: Eran Hammer-Lahav <eran@hueniverse.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081)
Cc: OAuth WG <oauth@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Basic signature support in the core specification
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2010 20:37:11 -0000

+1 for signature support in the core spec (which may look like normative pointers out to a separate spec module if it turns out there's wider usage for that module beyond OAuth).

	Eve

On 23 Sep 2010, at 6:43 PM, Eran Hammer-Lahav wrote:

> Since much of this recent debate was done off list, I'd like to ask people
> to simply express their support or objection to including a basic signature
> feature in the core spec, in line with the 1.0a signature approach.
> 
> This is not a vote, just taking the temperature of the group.
> 
> EHL
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OAuth mailing list
> OAuth@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth


Eve Maler                                  http://www.xmlgrrl.com/blog
+1 425 345 6756                         http://www.twitter.com/xmlgrrl