[OAUTH-WG] To the authors of jwsreq/JAR
Dominick Baier <dbaier@leastprivilege.com> Sun, 31 May 2020 08:22 UTC
Return-Path: <dbaier@leastprivilege.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95C413A132F for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 31 May 2020 01:22:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=leastprivilege-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id m3cTPqc_PR2I for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 31 May 2020 01:22:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt1-x829.google.com (mail-qt1-x829.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::829]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 57C433A132E for <oauth@ietf.org>; Sun, 31 May 2020 01:22:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt1-x829.google.com with SMTP id j32so5423409qte.10 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Sun, 31 May 2020 01:22:34 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=leastprivilege-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=2jRFah6OCbM0qAbZpKMI0GVWiM36suq2cEFfVkYq5pI=; b=ww+P9kZmD3Z2bGFpIk4NprG5fF9+wOfNcgYmGMwkw01JBmwwpXkLBUNm1fNcCAJyzK kbvGx5jyFN4Mwk8d/fhtc4zF7TdI5KAiXfcCkyD/2ZfK2YsXxfDLEtbkxg+IvcYPtujY pD/UZSsoEBpCViFRrguuvA6vNms20tD7zBUiIH9wS0N46O7ich18ukfqeXtG5I5IwFLn TRtV2xVXmcIeQbUI2zEyvMqxYtyxoL90crNCMAlVtb+tGFrpfgxKIwq4mJoDnLY2fzct EFlC0/qjHkQxqcfU4+BeIn8pg+2Eafy0nuhGdz6Pox3mZ1TZN8tfaLF9b4gVgLpp/pvn lnlQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=2jRFah6OCbM0qAbZpKMI0GVWiM36suq2cEFfVkYq5pI=; b=R9GNM4pByQq96K/7aCdLrk9AAg/q690SvkX2Ofzbr/RRIm25ChZLHVvJmg5M12hYAT +LSMJT07KBFaMWyG6mUTpzx963z5/QSqeyfy/yiwQVV0Ig+VIVRXIIAo3qbvdm+63h4H QJZlRPcuqxExIFoHcF5ucSJOqli7oUcE2ox1dcaiVJDFhEBUGuhNfKVUs2VzL9Apetpf Yy735B5Y5r4iQrT026fvWAybje6vcSt8dBQULqxUnBtB8DWmxRtmnwKvNlVb7O3wic17 LYKzUSuWdkd7XRzBHv7D3gTbCNFnmPIgV7NS6cXppPnNtfiQde0IrpECi/kI14WeY5OO peag==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533p/8hTOvW6WJj37YKwPJ32xvXuJJcpji0NMdvO7jkk1hha8zxk /QaRwsvZQRYmp/nKO+WvC7rLTuSPGD4LZIyOB65fuw3N6g==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzbRLDAUYrGQnBqsIQWxn1nY0lGQIXzsisHJctXkZGcS+aWvdRaKXGIAMdriX4NnSK7xSGT9JA68g96nrzGY7E=
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:1942:: with SMTP id g2mr17139824qtk.107.1590913352747; Sun, 31 May 2020 01:22:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 1058052472880 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Sun, 31 May 2020 01:22:31 -0700
From: Dominick Baier <dbaier@leastprivilege.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Sun, 31 May 2020 01:22:31 -0700
Message-ID: <CAO7Ng+sggD_n++fD74iG9suN9PcwB815bMYuDRhif3Mw2HOfJg@mail.gmail.com>
To: "oauth@ietf.org" <oauth@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000042606905a6ed6193"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/oauth/2_oF41WjXCjGMIJMgZHziglIf94>
Subject: [OAUTH-WG] To the authors of jwsreq/JAR
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/oauth/>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 May 2020 08:22:36 -0000
Hi, We had asked a couple of questions over the last weeks regarding details of the JAR spec. Not a single response from the spec authors. We are in the process of implementing JAR and about to release the software. We need some clarifications and I am confused that we did not get any response. Is it a technical issue? thanks ——— Dominick Baier
- [OAUTH-WG] To the authors of jwsreq/JAR Dominick Baier
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] To the authors of jwsreq/JAR Nat Sakimura