IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Security area review

Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net> Mon, 29 August 2011 08:14 UTC

Return-Path: <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB91321F874B for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Aug 2011 01:14:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id I0xblE4kPdPr for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Aug 2011 01:14:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net [213.165.64.22]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 8451B21F8584 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Mon, 29 Aug 2011 01:14:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 29 Aug 2011 08:15:52 -0000
Received: from a88-115-210-23.elisa-laajakaista.fi (EHLO [10.0.0.8]) [88.115.210.23] by mail.gmx.net (mp064) with SMTP; 29 Aug 2011 10:15:52 +0200
X-Authenticated: #29516787
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19HwDp/9xtHlIGZIE355v/VZ9OSD5sCV1Evmd1TBz fdkPwlW9S73yZD
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>
In-Reply-To: <90C41DD21FB7C64BB94121FBBC2E72345024864A96@P3PW5EX1MB01.EX1.SECURESERVER.NET>
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2011 11:15:51 +0300
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <1765F65A-9FFF-47AC-89D0-EC29E2918EE9@gmx.net>
References: <90C41DD21FB7C64BB94121FBBC2E72345024864A96@P3PW5EX1MB01.EX1.SECURESERVER.NET>
To: Eran Hammer-Lahav <eran@hueniverse.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
Cc: OAuth WG <oauth@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Security area review
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2011 08:14:37 -0000

Hi Eran, 

I gave presentations to the security area directorate, and have asked for review comments. Some of the folks (such as Tom Yu, and Shawn Emery) showed up in the meetings and the side meetings and provided comments. 
As Barry said, there will be more review comments flying in after the document left the working group. 

Ciao
Hannes

PS: I had also given presentations at the SAAG meeting to solicit more feedback. 

On Aug 6, 2011, at 10:29 AM, Eran Hammer-Lahav wrote:

> Did the chairs issue a last call request to anyone in the security area? I thought the whole point of moving this working group from apps to security was to increase the review and participation of that area. So far I have seen absolutely nothing to indicate any such contribution. I would like to know what actual actions are being taken to turn this promise into reality.
>  
> EHL
> _______________________________________________
> OAuth mailing list
> OAuth@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email