Re: [OAUTH-WG] Web apps BCP feedback
Neil Madden <neil.madden@forgerock.com> Sun, 26 September 2021 12:17 UTC
Return-Path: <neil.madden@forgerock.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6203A3A21D6 for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 26 Sep 2021 05:17:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=forgerock.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id spLuMH_hUunJ for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 26 Sep 2021 05:17:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wr1-x42c.google.com (mail-wr1-x42c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::42c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9B03B3A21D4 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Sun, 26 Sep 2021 05:17:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wr1-x42c.google.com with SMTP id t8so43078012wri.1 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Sun, 26 Sep 2021 05:17:32 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=forgerock.com; s=google; h=from:mime-version:subject:date:message-id:references:cc:in-reply-to :to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=btH2b3kpvlN6wHqHg+nsCvst5ZpXmfsCIhpLYd5TGNE=; b=bcGhf61H42DNrjbM5gGXxVF8IRvH0QuI1DNFMRnR/q6UdgYUtPmH4qI78Tj/toUJRz 8aKhCUOyBD1suOpPZXj58p0oZH3dGXd8xIqjVYfYcXhO1D+lUW1gfSPl1MwOv4o25kRK ZqQM4PjtPw81bJ41W46rG2RUq763laxNRzkZQ=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:mime-version:subject:date:message-id :references:cc:in-reply-to:to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=btH2b3kpvlN6wHqHg+nsCvst5ZpXmfsCIhpLYd5TGNE=; b=ovnp57pZ18MNsaNW/6uDa/liMmEeR3oF9x+b8HjGq0mvhsDVy3+67DQUOrk1CCwnRM MbOA8zvkXn3Xy6/j8uKlaNvkROarMc8B382JWYyyonS7F/l2LR1/SSs0qXWoW5jd7FU4 kDbHi7RMYbupUju1nSdaq/JCMQoh4hhlG4rA+yNyrU1slZzVlBVt10+QKiccko70VwXG 8tG/Vpys8MdsAyN2Y/fYqVNFJyjCWOaZHFqqtGl5ryx5s5Cl+yrHQNGimYyOgiRc9YPt xhEYFRUNJEZvKPlfSzaQG8SEpP8xfYqgyFTdOR9l/wNlbYcUYkDUo/XnrcsZCScLzPxw KJEQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532NYYVUPmqMmnb+NU5vIKdG2LCRVEgfDLaM7nUfPJeKWlqs16xN eAR5VKBWayLAWLJ5xyWa5sVTLMtrpgDG3dIIz8oh4jxZ9h8ORS2TG35uQITRfYUcQwDTKsk78ho sosBotw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxwgk6WCuhk43TfUoLJVjKd3oEcCfUQB0t2ifPAX+EXM9qqmJJA/JhqF3QLxmxpqradNrNjRw==
X-Received: by 2002:a5d:6da9:: with SMTP id u9mr22245123wrs.155.1632658649335; Sun, 26 Sep 2021 05:17:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (152.249.143.150.dyn.plus.net. [150.143.249.152]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d3sm16410348wrb.36.2021.09.26.05.17.28 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 26 Sep 2021 05:17:29 -0700 (PDT)
From: Neil Madden <neil.madden@forgerock.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2021 13:17:28 +0100
Message-Id: <428175B3-D16B-437B-A602-F39491BCF6E1@forgerock.com>
References: <551F796F-0693-47BA-8A60-15ED2FA5AD7D@manicode.com>
Cc: Philippe De Ryck <philippe@pragmaticwebsecurity.com>, oauth <oauth@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <551F796F-0693-47BA-8A60-15ED2FA5AD7D@manicode.com>
To: Jim Manico <jim@manicode.com>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (18H17)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/oauth/2x8J74I_06fDe-AUxwc-yFeMjg8>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Web apps BCP feedback
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/oauth/>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2021 12:17:38 -0000
> On 26 Sep 2021, at 11:28, Jim Manico <jim@manicode.com> wrote: > > > That’s why cookies should be set with the __Host- prefix. > > You can also set the domain of a cookie to actually be a host (subdomain). Does that also prevent subdomains from clobbering root directory cookies No, sadly not. You can set a cookie with domain set to payments.example.com but then I can hijack foo.example.com and set my own cookie with domain=example.com and the server will be none the wiser. Cheers, Neil -- Manage My Preferences <https://preferences.forgerock.com/>, Unsubscribe <https://preferences.forgerock.com/>
- [OAUTH-WG] Web apps BCP feedback Dominick Baier
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Web apps BCP feedback Jim Manico
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Web apps BCP feedback Neil Madden
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Web apps BCP feedback Jim Manico
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Web apps BCP feedback Philippe De Ryck
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Web apps BCP feedback Neil Madden
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Web apps BCP feedback Jim Manico
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Web apps BCP feedback Neil Madden
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Web apps BCP feedback Thomas Broyer