Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Re-Chartering

Mike Jones <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com> Thu, 22 March 2012 17:26 UTC

Return-Path: <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD97F21F853D for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Mar 2012 10:26:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id h73TOavDAZ6h for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Mar 2012 10:26:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from db3outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com (db3ehsobe005.messaging.microsoft.com [213.199.154.143]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2D1F21F8516 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Mar 2012 10:26:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail115-db3-R.bigfish.com (10.3.81.226) by DB3EHSOBE003.bigfish.com (10.3.84.23) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.225.23; Thu, 22 Mar 2012 17:26:41 +0000
Received: from mail115-db3 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail115-db3-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9491F4E04FA; Thu, 22 Mar 2012 17:26:41 +0000 (UTC)
X-SpamScore: -28
X-BigFish: VS-28(zzbb2dI9371I936eKc85fh98dKzz1202hzz1033IL8275bh8275dhz2fh2a8h668h839hd25h)
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:131.107.125.8; KIP:(null); UIP:(null); IPV:NLI; H:TK5EX14HUBC101.redmond.corp.microsoft.com; RD:none; EFVD:NLI
Received-SPF: pass (mail115-db3: domain of microsoft.com designates 131.107.125.8 as permitted sender) client-ip=131.107.125.8; envelope-from=Michael.Jones@microsoft.com; helo=TK5EX14HUBC101.redmond.corp.microsoft.com ; icrosoft.com ;
Received: from mail115-db3 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail115-db3 (MessageSwitch) id 1332437199356419_1507; Thu, 22 Mar 2012 17:26:39 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from DB3EHSMHS011.bigfish.com (unknown [10.3.81.248]) by mail115-db3.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 470F2C0055; Thu, 22 Mar 2012 17:26:39 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from TK5EX14HUBC101.redmond.corp.microsoft.com (131.107.125.8) by DB3EHSMHS011.bigfish.com (10.3.87.111) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.225.23; Thu, 22 Mar 2012 17:26:37 +0000
Received: from TK5EX14MBXC284.redmond.corp.microsoft.com ([169.254.1.237]) by TK5EX14HUBC101.redmond.corp.microsoft.com ([157.54.7.153]) with mapi id 14.02.0283.004; Thu, 22 Mar 2012 17:26:32 +0000
From: Mike Jones <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com>
To: John Bradley <ve7jtb@ve7jtb.com>, Phil Hunt <phil.hunt@oracle.com>
Thread-Topic: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Re-Chartering
Thread-Index: Ac0IUOwQCRIf4APwgUm5DSot8V56SQ==
Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2012 17:26:31 +0000
Message-ID: <4E1F6AAD24975D4BA5B16804296739436642CE1A@TK5EX14MBXC284.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_4E1F6AAD24975D4BA5B16804296739436642CE1ATK5EX14MBXC284r_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: microsoft.com
Cc: "oauth@ietf.org" <oauth@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Re-Chartering
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2012 17:26:51 -0000

I agree with John that submitting the OpenID Connect dynamic client registration spec to the IETF would make no sense.  It is intentionally specific to the requirements of the Connect use case.

I sent the link to it only so people could compare them, if interested.

-- Mike
________________________________
From: John Bradley
Sent: 3/22/2012 9:43 AM
To: Phil Hunt
Cc: Mike Jones; oauth@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Re-Chartering

It is a OIDF spec at the moment.  We don't have any plan to submit it currently.

If there is a WG desire for that to happen the OIDF board would have to discuss making a submission.

All in all I don't know that it is worth the IPR Lawyer time, as Thomas has a quite similar ID Submission.

Anything is possible however.

John B.
On 2012-03-22, at 1:24 PM, Phil Hunt wrote:

Would the plan be for the Connect Registration spec to be submitted to IETF so they can become WG drafts?

The spec seems like a good starting point.

Phil

@independentid

[The entire original message is not included.]