Re: [OAUTH-WG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-oauth-urn-sub-ns-03.txt

Brian Campbell <bcampbell@pingidentity.com> Fri, 22 June 2012 13:40 UTC

Return-Path: <bcampbell@pingidentity.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C6AC21F8613 for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 Jun 2012 06:40:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.006
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.006 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.029, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id skspX+7y00tX for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 Jun 2012 06:40:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from na3sys009aog117.obsmtp.com (na3sys009aog117.obsmtp.com [74.125.149.242]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C79E21F85EA for <oauth@ietf.org>; Fri, 22 Jun 2012 06:40:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qc0-f176.google.com ([209.85.216.176]) (using TLSv1) by na3sys009aob117.postini.com ([74.125.148.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKT+R1wOCVz5p932swyJUMRTt1rMec0l5X@postini.com; Fri, 22 Jun 2012 06:40:16 PDT
Received: by qcsc21 with SMTP id c21so1079702qcs.35 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Fri, 22 Jun 2012 06:40:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-gm-message-state; bh=dQdTi9iKZBpGsHg+MOTpKVXdCuGc26Q7ZaLuUtRdFZ0=; b=O3/4+vYqDmdirkQ7elcyL2vNl89PdPUVZTNmyawFefZeO6eLbI2LUcQ1grubqsmQ6R AgER4kZluPMMiJqbtKShJq0x26h4mSGkclJKeeYEzE849lZYB4TjVRfb1EKf+mqnboRW uGRaxs4kwy1bzEE0paf141ZXznJbwkxqhogtQykXXOg58A2z8nMF6n7q8nT//yGWMcJy YdEjG70w3hGPSvKDMy64M1tkhzgnWi2JM3RHpX4gZ/dNPpgeGl/QMCQ1gJb7mDF+hB/R U68TVbEk+Rl2QV4JoE1vU98XMRZ8piioD4G2aHlY3KfLpNhovFYbHUl8fY1x7xfIB8hh botQ==
Received: by 10.224.182.13 with SMTP id ca13mr6332702qab.60.1340372415447; Fri, 22 Jun 2012 06:40:15 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.229.87.142 with HTTP; Fri, 22 Jun 2012 06:39:45 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4FE45FC1.3030007@cs.tcd.ie>
References: <20120621175317.32545.76545.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAC4RtVAcnGwv7yp=zwwAM--w-DubHfFpHFrKyHRzfe8Fjfg0Rg@mail.gmail.com> <CA+k3eCS0DYEqk4SDNpWJKJvWZgTqHAkojQVTPuZKmySHPxBR1A@mail.gmail.com> <4E1F6AAD24975D4BA5B1680429673943665637A0@TK5EX14MBXC283.redmond.corp.microsoft.com> <CALaySJ+sceJvFY_bhovjZrrXx7_C2P_WYcW4T1Jyh7f3Z2FTtg@mail.gmail.com> <4FE45FC1.3030007@cs.tcd.ie>
From: Brian Campbell <bcampbell@pingidentity.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 07:39:45 -0600
Message-ID: <CA+k3eCSmDj_ZbX6Hoa6SB03oAajuVGtZ45h=8rLZsBtXU8Mq+g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlJSyIXW+d/lmJWeyAVWfjEvL95x3iMSBzUvw5Aom9bkPwSu7TOUDb00q4vp0G7TE/cGwhb
Cc: OAuth WG <oauth@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-oauth-urn-sub-ns-03.txt
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 13:40:17 -0000

Unless there are objections from the WG, I'd like to publish -04 today
with two smallish changes (new text listed below) to address the
question raised yesterday in
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth/current/msg09381.html and
have -04 be the draft for LC.

First paragraph of §3:
 "If a registrant wishes to have a OAuth URI registered, then a URN of
   the form urn:ietf:params:oauth:<value> will be requested where
   <value> is a suitable representation of the functionality or concept
   being registered."

Index value bullet of §5.1
   "Index value: values subordinate to urn:ietf:params:oauth are of
      the from urn:ietf:params:oauth:<value> with <value> as the index
      value.  It is suggested that <value> include both a "class" and an
      "identifier-within-class" component, with the two components being
      separated by a colon (":"); other compositions of the <value> may
      also be used.

Thanks,
Brian

On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 6:06 AM, Stephen Farrell
<stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> wrote:
>
> I'll wait until the chairs tell me what you want
> but I'm fine with doing the IETF LC on -03 now, or
> with waiting if the chairs reckon that's better.
> So just let me know.
>
> Cheers,
> S.
> _______________________________________________
> OAuth mailing list
> OAuth@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth