Re: [OAUTH-WG] Second Last Call: <draft-hammer-hostmeta-16.txt> (Web Host Metadata) to Proposed Standard -- feedback
Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net> Sun, 03 July 2011 07:36 UTC
Return-Path: <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F62B21F8763 for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 3 Jul 2011 00:36:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vmq8EQNReEwm for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 3 Jul 2011 00:36:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net [213.165.64.22]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 9AF6821F8748 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Sun, 3 Jul 2011 00:36:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 03 Jul 2011 07:36:31 -0000
Received: from letku101.adsl.netsonic.fi (EHLO [10.0.0.8]) [194.29.195.101] by mail.gmx.net (mp064) with SMTP; 03 Jul 2011 09:36:31 +0200
X-Authenticated: #29516787
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX196sNo5Kjd62FrqGAYICYSCjMXDTEsvZCO0beqTGC bCS7K+OD5CF/Bz
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>
In-Reply-To: <11CBFBA2-434B-43FC-90C4-DADBACB49226@mnot.net>
Date: Sun, 03 Jul 2011 10:36:29 +0300
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <623429C9-70E2-4442-8ECF-AB827FD95251@gmx.net>
References: <11CBFBA2-434B-43FC-90C4-DADBACB49226@mnot.net>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
Cc: "ietf@ietf.org IETF" <ietf@ietf.org>, oauth WG <oauth@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Second Last Call: <draft-hammer-hostmeta-16.txt> (Web Host Metadata) to Proposed Standard -- feedback
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Jul 2011 07:36:33 -0000
I also never really understood why XRD was re-used. Btw, XRD is not used by any of the current OAuth WG documents, see http://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/oauth/ On Jun 22, 2011, at 8:08 AM, Mark Nottingham wrote: > * XRD -- XRD is an OASIS spec that's used by OpenID and OAuth. Maybe I'm just scarred by WS-*, but it seems very over-engineered for what it does. I understand that the communities had reasons for using it to leverage an existing user base for their specific user cases, but I don't see any reason to generalise such a beast into a generic mechanism.
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Second Last Call: <draft-hammer-ho… Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Second Last Call: <draft-hammer-ho… Eran Hammer-Lahav
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Second Last Call: <draft-hammer-ho… William J. Mills
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Second Last Call: <draft-hammer-ho… Eve Maler
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Second Last Call: <draft-hammer-ho… Justin Richer