IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Conclusion of 'OAuth Security Topics' Call for Adoption

Nat Sakimura <sakimura@gmail.com> Thu, 02 March 2017 18:55 UTC

Return-Path: <sakimura@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 789701295EE for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Mar 2017 10:55:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hyST96hqgo_v for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Mar 2017 10:55:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qk0-x22b.google.com (mail-qk0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2D6251295BC for <oauth@ietf.org>; Thu, 2 Mar 2017 10:55:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qk0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id m67so23891586qkf.2 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Thu, 02 Mar 2017 10:55:37 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=TJsgHmeIq5TwEtO7yquZ+u7T57xS2jfB1db7Y8+8EqA=; b=WtB7OKKwwoJEHwxnMgS0SLvkuWi0g86L8Cx5es9WzEhyMs7F6xXGMZESVUtZp6eaNG bSTUrTys2G4namAz6Cahp1QxVkmCTctxfLLa732SA6u4DcmdE0jd9m4S06Z/M91Eczz6 MIjAYagJp8OpZ7zig2aSCIM5PY2TMEwiyhjG5zRgc0RBHGcVC9RaRTK4VXwH9ls7RTm3 lD8NlPt/rGHP/yj+tXeV7MOzU/ey5xCavQX7KVBsrxNOaHw09SUlGEk16FQtBS8AYnZL 9XXy6N7WfnoMxoBrJQ/D7hyL7vXjTbNNxduJ7twa8gIximSp/lNh5Le6O0sf8WcCTOxJ CAvw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=TJsgHmeIq5TwEtO7yquZ+u7T57xS2jfB1db7Y8+8EqA=; b=sBGtXxdbU1xg/OrNigB3HJ2tsZH44vIgNCSmzfxmuwGYuuOMufvbDAresHaUk4DEmo WsIwUtTe+hzMzFveqnZeAbyYgY5Q906gg9EzqWrDcMIfrNsK9jWXSo9Zo2i3lk01HFGq TE8EknuYG8KcIrmZuzddpmLZlfw4cWyxnGHcN0IzLhnyd3+V56Lk7gAptuwUxrrRQ1Zj l2lz2rFMdMX1ybmhCowfqNJN/EgSgspJbF7WYOXX5+3M/igXalYGIWwrDVxiG5KBPIyD dLjiY/kI6y/cFC/Kl+inceLL7FcWKQZypgWgBGFmSNOt6IQ9LsM/9RklJbHLaUlwXx4u f7gw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39n/wIaAHU3jHoPfckm0f3H0FikR2N8USnVYt4sTcwT39N8Y4T0fv3znOnWn3LCeugHa3PjgMGDdPUaG4w==
X-Received: by 10.237.39.222 with SMTP id m30mr12097782qtg.21.1488480936038; Thu, 02 Mar 2017 10:55:36 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <7d639f9c-aecf-5b9b-be56-e16fd5437551@gmx.net>
In-Reply-To: <7d639f9c-aecf-5b9b-be56-e16fd5437551@gmx.net>
From: Nat Sakimura <sakimura@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2017 18:55:25 +0000
Message-ID: <CABzCy2CeOzrdiX874431A-S=oqVT3iBtQ4js=acDS3O5sa5c_g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>, "oauth@ietf.org" <oauth@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f403045f434273053c0549c3f9dc"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/oauth/3iTJieaZlupdYhUCF1DhzbcaeFQ>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Conclusion of 'OAuth Security Topics' Call for Adoption
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/oauth/>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2017 18:55:38 -0000

Great!

On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 8:02 PM Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>
wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> earlier this month we issued a call for adoption of the OAuth security
> topics draft, see draft-lodderstedt-oauth-security-topics-00, and the
> response was quite positive on the list (as well as during the last f2f
> meeting).
>
> For this reason, we ask the authors to submit a WG version of the
> document and to discuss new content for the document in preparation for
> the next meeting.
>
> Note that the intention of the document is to discuss security topics as
> they relate to the work in the OAuth working group. As this initial
> document already does, it describes a problem statement and outlines
> various ways to mitigate the problems. I expect the working group to
> decide which solution approach is most appropriate and to detail it (at
> a specification level) in a separate document (some of those documents
> already exist in the working group). This should help us make decisions
> that are not just point solutions for specific problems but rather
> consider the big picture.
>
> Ciao
> Hannes & Derek
>
> _______________________________________________
> OAuth mailing list
> OAuth@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
>
-- 

Nat Sakimura

Chairman of the Board, OpenID Foundation

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email