Re: [OAUTH-WG] oauth - Requested sessions have been scheduled for IETF 98

Antonio Sanso <> Tue, 21 March 2017 13:27 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD498129408 for <>; Tue, 21 Mar 2017 06:27:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.807
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.807 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, HTTPS_HTTP_MISMATCH=1.989, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-2.796, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Zq2-5OlhYPpI for <>; Tue, 21 Mar 2017 06:27:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C74F3129871 for <>; Tue, 21 Mar 2017 06:27:50 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=8ouil8eqnWEozAwz8bvMEYi8IVa+GHC2vP21cOVIcOw=; b=H1wjAoLzKQoQxOuod34kqgAE21XgtgkxAxPliQVRlzW58t3lwMK1Kj5KLAYrumKSV+Uu8JpIozwu0QN2TBuYHCSUgkg9uKGbzUmknhdbiQBW28zrb4FQYAhYk4zulVMaRSZ3XmSLgembcgETet3TzLRpvc6W3dLKZcNWEAYDndM=
Received: from ( by ( with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P384) id 15.1.977.11; Tue, 21 Mar 2017 13:27:47 +0000
Received: from ([]) by ([]) with mapi id 15.01.0977.020; Tue, 21 Mar 2017 13:27:46 +0000
From: Antonio Sanso <>
To: Torsten Lodderstedt <>
CC: Hannes Tschofenig <>, Hannes Tschofenig <>, Derek Atkins <>, "" <>
Thread-Topic: [OAUTH-WG] oauth - Requested sessions have been scheduled for IETF 98
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2017 13:27:45 +0000
Message-ID: <>
References: <> <> <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
authentication-results:; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;; dmarc=none action=none;
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-originating-ip: []
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; BY1PR0201MB1031; 7:hUzUJ0RC11/fChW95V0EC6EHS7Nyn2yvK1M/WwOu/FAzfKynsRa2B3NldBrqgDwl4UuD3IQVGa3tx/TOxrtQiOnV/G6GfYrU8GhjmJmzJ2elyaRWX0AyCKSOtpzcZL0syAZYllOOMW5dr7pauGJZrU1Bt0qD0iJN3/u0+3XdIWwF8s2R1OTSWMX6tvJJuTDpKr2SYClVsHuoBc+/6s5NZZ9IF7rpHrfDv7VOm25HX3nxGrK1hZ68GcoQYBZ7N1yCeVzdcujok77/uShtyuldxDxUe81saWuNhpgVSlhImVF1z9AysOSXBP5kCskYF6Fq/F0HEak5+4zUk8aVmwZkaA==; 20:B2Q2bxlaI9rLAeaZ03t2UC/a10rGTBjNF+hYunGEHm51Co+AGioZmntKGtph9ORYJjEfP5EzcyohyecnY2FwcOXEi5+0Cxlk587gKczCEhSTrQhi0ykhGaGRkTF1rPDwwzA3J2zEAGD9K8HLRXwCfn6+Wmh2GrX8rPR987DqYFY=
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: e3984e39-ecf1-4b83-0b06-08d4705e1053
x-ms-office365-filtering-ht: Tenant
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(22001)(2017030254075)(48565401081); SRVR:BY1PR0201MB1031;
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(158342451672863)(192374486261705)(189930954265078)(219752817060721);
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(61425038)(6040375)(601004)(2401047)(8121501046)(5005006)(3002001)(10201501046)(6055026)(61426038)(61427038)(6041248)(20161123564025)(20161123555025)(20161123560025)(20161123558025)(20161123562025)(6072148); SRVR:BY1PR0201MB1031; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:BY1PR0201MB1031;
x-forefront-prvs: 02530BD3AA
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(39410400002)(39450400003)(39850400002)(39840400002)(39860400002)(13464003)(497574002)(51414003)(24454002)(377454003)(54356999)(76176999)(3660700001)(77096006)(50986999)(7906003)(606005)(25786008)(122556002)(575784001)(2906002)(86362001)(36756003)(6506006)(6436002)(66066001)(102836003)(3846002)(6116002)(2950100002)(7736002)(6486002)(3280700002)(189998001)(5660300001)(38730400002)(6916009)(33656002)(54906002)(6246003)(110136004)(82746002)(2900100001)(554214002)(83716003)(99286003)(53936002)(229853002)(10090500001)(53546009)(236005)(4326008)(81166006)(6306002)(54896002)(6512007)(8936002)(104396002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:BY1PR0201MB1031;; FPR:; SPF:None; MLV:sfv; LANG:en;
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_2452F93FBC4D4F42AD4C85A0672BFBE8adobecom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 21 Mar 2017 13:27:45.9279 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: fa7b1b5a-7b34-4387-94ae-d2c178decee1
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BY1PR0201MB1031
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] oauth - Requested sessions have been scheduled for IETF 98
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2017 13:27:54 -0000

hi Torsten,

good one. I personally I am looking forward to see this particular document find its way.

IMHO this is something much needed.



On Mar 21, 2017, at 2:08 PM, Torsten Lodderstedt <<>> wrote:

Hi Chairs,

I would like to request 5 minutes on Monday to briefly present the status of the security document. This is mainly to raise awareness in the group since I didn’t get that much input on it since Seoul.

kind regards,

Am 18.03.2017 um 01:52 schrieb Mike Jones <<>>:

Hi Chairs,

I'd like to request that the following presentations be added to the agenda:

OAuth Token Exchange (draft-ietf-oauth-token-exchange) - Mike Jones - 15 minutes
OAuth Authorization Server Metadata (draft-ietf-oauth-discovery) - Mike Jones - 15 minutes

I'd also talked with Brian Campbell and I think he wants to lead this discussion, in part based on his implementation experience:

OAuth Token Binding (draft-ietf-oauth-token-binding) - Brian Campbell - 30 minutes

(Brian may suggest a different amount of time)

I agree that William Dennis should present about the OAuth Device Flow (draft-ietf-oauth-device-flow).

For completeness, I don't think a presentation is needed about OAuth AMR Values (draft-ietf-oauth-amr-values) because it's now completed its IESG review.

I'll look forward to seeing many of you in just over a week!

-- Mike

-----Original Message-----
From: OAuth [] On Behalf Of "IETF Secretariat"
Sent: Friday, March 3, 2017 3:55 PM
Subject: [OAUTH-WG] oauth - Requested sessions have been scheduled for IETF 98

Dear Stephanie McCammon,

The session(s) that you have requested have been scheduled.
Below is the scheduled session information followed by the original request.

oauth Session 1 (2:30:00)
  Friday, Morning Session I 0900-1130
  Room Name: Zurich C size: 100
  oauth Session 2 (1:00:00)
  Monday, Afternoon Session III 1710-1810
  Room Name: Zurich C size: 100

Request Information:

Working Group Name: Web Authorization Protocol Area Name: Security Area Session Requester: Stephanie McCammon

Number of Sessions: 2
Length of Session(s):  2.5 Hours, 1 Hour Number of Attendees: 50 Conflicts to Avoid:
First Priority: saag core tls tokbind

People who must be present:
Hannes Tschofenig
Kathleen Moriarty
Derek Atkins

Resources Requested:
Projector in room

Special Requests:
Please avoid conflict with sec area BoFs.

OAuth mailing list<>

OAuth mailing list<>

OAuth mailing list<>