IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Working Group Last Call on Dynamic Client Registration Documents

Justin Richer <jricher@mitre.org> Fri, 04 April 2014 13:23 UTC

Return-Path: <jricher@mitre.org>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 285F71A0174 for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Apr 2014 06:23:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.209
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.209 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FAAn-f_sVuaf for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Apr 2014 06:23:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpksrv1.mitre.org (smtpksrv1.mitre.org [198.49.146.77]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67FC61A018B for <oauth@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 Apr 2014 06:23:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpksrv1.mitre.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id BD5FD1F00EC; Fri, 4 Apr 2014 09:23:09 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from IMCCAS03.MITRE.ORG (imccas03.mitre.org [129.83.29.80]) by smtpksrv1.mitre.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A309A1F0F02; Fri, 4 Apr 2014 09:23:09 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [10.146.15.6] (129.83.31.51) by IMCCAS03.MITRE.ORG (129.83.29.80) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.174.1; Fri, 4 Apr 2014 09:23:09 -0400
Message-ID: <533EB22D.9070604@mitre.org>
Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2014 09:22:53 -0400
From: Justin Richer <jricher@mitre.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>, "oauth@ietf.org" <oauth@ietf.org>
References: <533E77C3.9000509@gmx.net>
In-Reply-To: <533E77C3.9000509@gmx.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------060207050003070903020007"
X-Originating-IP: [129.83.31.51]
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/oauth/4527rHEd-b41UAGiDQ6uV9j4Mho
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Working Group Last Call on Dynamic Client Registration Documents
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth/>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Apr 2014 13:23:19 -0000

I believe the two documents should be merged back into one, keeping the 
same functionality. It doesn't help developers to split them out like 
this and it doesn't change the modularity of the implementation at all 
to have things listed in separate documents.

I would really like to see actual concrete implementations of the 
software statement.

  -- Justin

On 04/04/2014 05:13 AM, Hannes Tschofenig wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This is a Last Call for comments on the dynamic client registration
> documents:
>
> * OAuth 2.0 Dynamic Client Registration Core Protocol
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-oauth-dyn-reg-16
>
> * OAuth 2.0 Dynamic Client Registration Metadata
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-oauth-dyn-reg-metadata-00
>
> Since we have to do the last call for these two documents together we
> are setting the call for **3 weeks**.
>
> Please have your comments in no later than April 25th.
>
> Ciao
> Hannes & Derek
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OAuth mailing list
> OAuth@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth

v2.8.3 | Report a Bug | By Email