[OAUTH-WG] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6749 (4945)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Tue, 21 February 2017 20:47 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E24E8129492 for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Feb 2017 12:47:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.202
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.202 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cJhjH2u5jE7R for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Feb 2017 12:47:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 634EF12944C for <oauth@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Feb 2017 12:47:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 4FD3BB802E4; Tue, 21 Feb 2017 12:47:18 -0800 (PST)
To: dick.hardt@gmail.com, stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie, Kathleen.Moriarty.ietf@gmail.com, derek@ihtfp.com, Hannes.Tschofenig@gmx.net
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 30:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Message-Id: <20170221204718.4FD3BB802E4@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2017 12:47:18 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/oauth/4puXJpq6PuPEqVadf7aLPdbhZUU>
Cc: text/plain@rfc-editor.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.orgContent-Type, oauth@ietf.org, gaur.1@iitj.ac.in, charset=UTF-8@rfc-editor.org
Subject: [OAUTH-WG] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6749 (4945)
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/oauth/>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2017 20:47:23 -0000
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6749, "The OAuth 2.0 Authorization Framework". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=6749&eid=4945 -------------------------------------- Type: Editorial Reported by: Abhimanyu Singh Gaur <gaur.1@iitj.ac.in> Section: 4.1.4 Original Text ------------- If the access token request is valid and authorized, the authorization server issues an access token and optional refresh token as described in Section 5.1. If the request client authentication failed or is invalid, the authorization server returns an error response as described in Section 5.2. Corrected Text -------------- If the access token request is valid and authorized, the authorization server issues an access token and optional refresh token as described in Section 5.1. If the request failed client authentication or is invalid, the authorization server returns an error response as described in Section 5.2. Notes ----- In the 2nd line, "request failed" makes more sense than the original text. The 1st paragraph of section 5 in the document and the para just before section 5 also state "If the request failed client authentication or ..." instead of what is currently mentioned in section 4.1.4. It is just a typing mistake, I think the words got exchanged during typing. Please, correct it. Instructions: ------------- This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC6749 (draft-ietf-oauth-v2-31) -------------------------------------- Title : The OAuth 2.0 Authorization Framework Publication Date : October 2012 Author(s) : D. Hardt, Ed. Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Web Authorization Protocol Area : Security Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [OAUTH-WG] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6749 (4… RFC Errata System