Re: [OAUTH-WG] JARM

[Neil Madden <[e-mail]>]

If you’re using auth code and PKCE, what does JARM add?

Neil

> On 23 Jan 2020, at 06:03, Takahiko Kawasaki <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
> 
> I think that JARM is good and even feel that JARM should exist there from a logical perspective because JARM is to Authorization Response what Request Object is to Authorization Request. It is good that we don't have to use "ID Token as Detached Signature" (Financial-grade API Part 2) when JARM is used.
> 
> FWIW, I (Authlete) finished implementing JARM at the beginning of October, 2018, about a year and 3 months ago.
> 
> Best Regards,
> Takahiko Kawasaki
> 
>> On Sat, Jan 18, 2020 at 5:22 AM Brian Campbell <bcampbell=[e-mail]> wrote:
>> I'd be in favor of it. 
>> 
>>> On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 9:28 AM Torsten Lodderstedt <torsten=[e-mail]> wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>>>> Am 16.01.2020 um 16:48 schrieb Justin Richer <[e-mail]>:
>>>>> 
>>>> Maybe PAR and JAR (and JARM?) end up going out as a bundle of specs.
>>> 
>>> Since Justin brought it up, I would like to know whether the community has appetite to standardize JARM as well.
>>> 
>>> Here is the link to the spec: https://openid.net/specs/openid-financial-api-jarm-ID1.html
>>> 
>>> What do you think?
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> OAuth mailing list
>>> [e-mail]
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
>> 
>> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited...  If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete the message and any file attachments from your computer. Thank you._______________________________________________
>> OAuth mailing list
>> [e-mail]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
> _______________________________________________
> OAuth mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth