Re: [OAUTH-WG] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-oauth-dyn-reg-27: (with COMMENT)

["Ben Campbell" <[e-mail]>]

On 21 Apr 2015, at 20:30, Justin Richer wrote:

> Ben et. al,
>
> We’ve incorporated feedback into the latest draft:
>
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-oauth-dyn-reg-28 
> <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-oauth-dyn-reg-28>
>>

I think that resolves all my comments save one:

[...]

>>
>>>
>>> 4.1 and 4.2 allow the designated expert to accept preliminary
>>> registrations if they are confident a spec will be published. 
>>> Shouldn't
>>> this follow the normal processes for preliminary registrations? Is 
>>> there
>>> a way to walk back registrations if the spec isn't published after 
>>> all?
>>
>> I’ll defer to others’ expertise on the right text for the IANA 
>> section, this was imported from another example spec.
>>

BCP 100 (RFC 7120) describes the IANA early allocation procedures. You 
might consider a reference to that, so you can capture the processes for 
walking back allocations that don't get finalized. Or, unless you want 
additional restrictions not in the BCP, you could leave out mention of 
early allocations completely, and let IANA deal with it according to 
standard procedures.


[...]