IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Basic signature support in the core specification

David Recordon <recordond@gmail.com> Fri, 24 September 2010 23:53 UTC

Return-Path: <recordond@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F16A3A6AB4 for <oauth@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Sep 2010 16:53:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.477
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.477 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.121, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ru2RoqNHRlb5 for <oauth@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Sep 2010 16:53:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-iw0-f172.google.com (mail-iw0-f172.google.com [209.85.214.172]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 051EA3A6814 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Sep 2010 16:53:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by iwn3 with SMTP id 3so3226167iwn.31 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Sep 2010 16:54:03 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=+3MHddXrPiBjENc6FuJiA+bIt1JlnaSF2CdUrEkExlw=; b=vPPASyWy2oyEK+hNZr47uY1kOFwwfxAcgSyU+rCCUHfc7OAE5+QthO5ezxp15V5Em8 ml5O75HkEwiSEmU4oAKdqFj0DD8ryx3mA95PzU36F8iXq9bW6sliDivO2K3HYWEEVpLC ekFxCKnqiRhJ8egQJgjcO/kyOS//AW/xosS30=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=NhmM9e+dggZsnYcPR9KIIgpKkbHK3dTS5niJ2GIKQ8QcmPwr7KLUuD2qBXB2REankU 7HRPSLfbTjWvcR5kfbprr9q9Tt6BfeNL5qUpg78nooG3t6wJgzzmiHZ2o30BtWxeliVQ QGK4DEG8v9owVHr5WzNVmScigtFsqfCXKECWs=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.231.171.3 with SMTP id f3mr4687540ibz.145.1285372443640; Fri, 24 Sep 2010 16:54:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.231.195.159 with HTTP; Fri, 24 Sep 2010 16:54:03 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <C8C15057.3AC64%eran@hueniverse.com>
References: <C8C15057.3AC64%eran@hueniverse.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2010 16:54:03 -0700
Message-ID: <AANLkTinHgS-U0t0WDnk+tXs7qXzVfNz9rr-OWZKMQdr7@mail.gmail.com>
From: David Recordon <recordond@gmail.com>
To: Eran Hammer-Lahav <eran@hueniverse.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0016e6d26cb6e844aa04910a1711"
Cc: OAuth WG <oauth@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Basic signature support in the core specification
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2010 23:53:32 -0000

+1 on core

On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 6:43 PM, Eran Hammer-Lahav <eran@hueniverse.com>wrote:

> Since much of this recent debate was done off list, I'd like to ask people
> to simply express their support or objection to including a basic signature
> feature in the core spec, in line with the 1.0a signature approach.
>
> This is not a vote, just taking the temperature of the group.
>
> EHL
>
> _______________________________________________
> OAuth mailing list
> OAuth@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
>

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status