Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth session at IETF-79

Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> Fri, 15 October 2010 11:08 UTC

Return-Path: <lear@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B51533A6AA4 for <oauth@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 Oct 2010 04:08:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OXdWatU3Hpnd for <oauth@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 Oct 2010 04:08:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sj-iport-4.cisco.com (sj-iport-4.cisco.com [171.68.10.86]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF07D3A6A55 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Fri, 15 Oct 2010 04:08:31 -0700 (PDT)
Authentication-Results: sj-iport-4.cisco.com; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvYFACvTt0yrRN+K/2dsb2JhbACDH5AHjXtxoFSKHZIegSKDM3QEiko
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.57,335,1283731200"; d="scan'208";a="201334230"
Received: from sj-core-4.cisco.com ([171.68.223.138]) by sj-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 15 Oct 2010 11:09:52 +0000
Received: from ams3-vpn-dhcp5233.cisco.com (ams3-vpn-dhcp5233.cisco.com [10.61.84.112]) by sj-core-4.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o9FB9phD001618; Fri, 15 Oct 2010 11:09:52 GMT
Message-ID: <4CB8369F.4000804@cisco.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2010 13:10:23 +0200
From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100915 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: igor.faynberg@alcatel-lucent.com
References: <4CB7386A.5080306@lodderstedt.net> <F39A9271-BBD6-413D-BB7A-369116FC658D@gmx.net> <4CB7F449.7020609@lodderstedt.net> <4CB801E8.6030407@alcatel-lucent.com>
In-Reply-To: <4CB801E8.6030407@alcatel-lucent.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: oauth@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth session at IETF-79
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2010 11:08:32 -0000

 I agree with Hannes' approach.  What happened in Maastricht was that we
ended up with  bifurcated discussions- in the room and on the list. 
That didn't seem very productive.