Re: [OAUTH-WG] Question about RFC 7622 (Token Introspection)

Buhake Sindi <buhake@gmail.com> Fri, 15 January 2016 14:13 UTC

Return-Path: <buhake@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF2DC1B2D60 for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 Jan 2016 06:13:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id smiVUX7SNyhR for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 Jan 2016 06:13:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lb0-x22c.google.com (mail-lb0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c04::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2178E1B2D5D for <oauth@ietf.org>; Fri, 15 Jan 2016 06:13:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lb0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id cl12so98001183lbc.1 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Fri, 15 Jan 2016 06:13:06 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=J/wc9nwsDUq0Wcln7GIABfDYJ5fTpYwcxVIp332t9+w=; b=k6quSjRX4CEr2ZLSBY4JSiPWZZ6X3nzLyoI/ficvCFZUxXzYBfIKxxaEwB7WRWVBl1 m4w+qIEwaWnO3Suf9hLzZSDepcjV9Ci5dTZGYhWuoGCsk2icD9OtlE1W0Qg352XreZxw lLeNFfgdNKQNUVS9mUgSP8AYukkENVJyGMEY83XgYCGKQuxrbfnU54VQa5rqU5CpLGsX AmS7VXhDXy10XZBFTLYhqY3xFIs2XyXqNVGlFT/nHNVwm5N/HwA79RVQm45wTmED2g4B qHXh2wYdl8rfBlSTIGUdoq2RHnD9pFmvKfRoD0D1e4aYNboqWN2lpS6OvYzrQw4mRKhm NU/w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=J/wc9nwsDUq0Wcln7GIABfDYJ5fTpYwcxVIp332t9+w=; b=QRMC0CcIRgpDqsh7CC8boZcd2TZe0/RgNys3hQGi+7eQHUkELV/oaw9dAMCaMdEv2i OKs0uS0CKd75CmitoWX8mlcKbn05fejXny9nWaXvJj9eM5lj1mjV9j2Q5y//TsNs89bw hktyLQMwict/HinGgo4jaLsDVGVIVtRbOSKb8qXppoaR1Pexma2IHIF0sQUNo4Q295zS uf+BTSPSHdvxlnw9QP84LvBBKI2oVYi0jbU8mGP7k8GwSBa7ahw6MlAJGO0BFeaAY2Z8 nHyxRqFRcG3b72xIik/59mXEEZ5IQL82RbItFpH6mh9LNohUh/Ok3mYZMownJADW9TFX IkZw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOS5BQ8XhPggckkHUxCOUQsmtArT7ejk0t8YUucXya0vRqoF0Z4SEl3n8ohiU8teFGFOVfhOrX5cHSykNg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.112.180.7 with SMTP id dk7mr2789364lbc.65.1452867184314; Fri, 15 Jan 2016 06:13:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.114.217.34 with HTTP; Fri, 15 Jan 2016 06:13:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.114.217.34 with HTTP; Fri, 15 Jan 2016 06:13:04 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <5698CB3D.1030306@gmail.com>
References: <CA+k3eCSpWFwyvk=XHP4b_zxzu-zrMYsS-axF6csO90-ahmkueQ@mail.gmail.com> <BY2PR03MB4423033D5604E9E36B20C23F5CA0@BY2PR03MB442.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> <5CA9073D-BBF7-48BD-BEC5-1F626E8C3818@mit.edu> <8EB68572-DA59-482D-A660-FA6D9848AAD2@oracle.com> <ade5692aa1afa2d9d79b8ac7a55bf150@lodderstedt.net> <5698CB3D.1030306@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 16:13:04 +0200
Message-ID: <CABUp4f4VPbDSyanidG3kWQ7GovGk1jf845=B7LwekS-1Ga2E_w@mail.gmail.com>
From: Buhake Sindi <buhake@gmail.com>
To: Sergey Beryozkin <sberyozkin@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e0112cad06d520805296000a3
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/oauth/6coOIoL7IgQhKyPcMdJ6mF9hV0Q>
Cc: oauth@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Question about RFC 7622 (Token Introspection)
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/oauth/>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 14:13:08 -0000

Hi,

Are you not mistaking this with RFC 7662? :-)

Kind Regards,

Buhake Sindi
On 15 Jan 2016 12:34, "Sergey Beryozkin" <sberyozkin@gmail.com>; wrote:

> Hi All,
>
> I'm reviewing RFC 7622 as we are going ahead with implementing it.
> I have a question:
>
> 1. Token Hint in the introspection request.
> The spec mentions 'refresh_token' as one of the possible values. But a
> protected resource does not see a refresh token (ever ?), it is Access
> Token service which does.
> When would a protected resource use a 'refresh_token' hint when requesting
> an introspection response ?
>
> Thanks, Sergey
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OAuth mailing list
> OAuth@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
>