Re: [OAUTH-WG] MAC: body-hash
Peter Wolanin <peter.wolanin@acquia.com> Wed, 23 November 2011 19:53 UTC
Return-Path: <peter.wolanin@acquia.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 756C721F86DD for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Nov 2011 11:53:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.977
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.977 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Jb251I6ZpRt2 for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Nov 2011 11:53:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from exprod7og115.obsmtp.com (exprod7og115.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.217]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 8891821F8573 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Wed, 23 Nov 2011 11:53:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-vx0-f179.google.com ([209.85.220.179]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob115.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKTs1PNENzlJ2c9FpN7+7LMEjM0LNWVhEi@postini.com; Wed, 23 Nov 2011 11:53:41 PST
Received: by mail-vx0-f179.google.com with SMTP id fl15so1721012vcb.10 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Wed, 23 Nov 2011 11:53:24 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.182.169.34 with SMTP id ab2mr8839562obc.27.1322078004412; Wed, 23 Nov 2011 11:53:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.182.30.228 with HTTP; Wed, 23 Nov 2011 11:53:24 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <90C41DD21FB7C64BB94121FBBC2E7234526735EDF1@P3PW5EX1MB01.EX1.SECURESERVER.NET>
References: <90C41DD21FB7C64BB94121FBBC2E7234526735EDF1@P3PW5EX1MB01.EX1.SECURESERVER.NET>
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2011 14:53:24 -0500
Message-ID: <CAH0thKCUN9+Q47ZkGPzvfk81S0yUXxzxD8XURJP=p-ZBvOJ6pw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Peter Wolanin <peter.wolanin@acquia.com>
To: Eran Hammer-Lahav <eran@hueniverse.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: OAuth WG <oauth@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] MAC: body-hash
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2011 19:53:42 -0000
As long as a specific service can make an ext containing the body hash required, I think this is fine. Can the spec include body hash as an example of an ext? Thanks, Peter On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 10:39 AM, Eran Hammer-Lahav <eran@hueniverse.com> wrote: > I want to reaffirm our previous consensus to drop the body-hash parameter > and leave the ext parameter. Body-hash as currently specified is going to > cause significant interop issues due to character (and other) encoding > issues. Providers who desire to MAC the body can define their own ext use > case. > > > > Let me know if you have an objection to this change. > > > > EHL > > > _______________________________________________ > OAuth mailing list > OAuth@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth > -- Peter M. Wolanin, Ph.D. : Momentum Specialist, Acquia. Inc. peter.wolanin@acquia.com : 781-313-8322 "Get a free, hosted Drupal 7 site: http://www.drupalgardens.com"
- [OAUTH-WG] MAC: body-hash Eran Hammer-Lahav
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] MAC: body-hash William Mills
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] MAC: body-hash Phil Hunt
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] MAC: body-hash Eran Hammer-Lahav
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] MAC: body-hash Peter Wolanin
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] MAC: body-hash Peter Wolanin
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] MAC: body-hash Eran Hammer-Lahav