[OAUTH-WG] Call for Adoption: OAuth 2.0 Discovery

Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net> Tue, 19 January 2016 11:48 UTC

Return-Path: <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E79041B2C9D for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Jan 2016 03:48:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.601
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Zs8OBTd-Mrre for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Jan 2016 03:48:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3E0891B2CA9 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Jan 2016 03:48:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.10.141] ([82.142.85.169]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx001) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MHH6Z-1aPbNi09fX-00E3TX for <oauth@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Jan 2016 12:48:41 +0100
From: Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>
Openpgp: id=071A97A9ECBADCA8E31E678554D9CEEF4D776BC9
X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1110
To: "oauth@ietf.org" <oauth@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <569E2298.3010508@gmx.net>
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 12:48:40 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="jhlergb6DfgX01M4OUw4uaWMnM3kSlwKL"
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:UOK/elGt8PkVsw0b4CyqcXj8+u88nnd0xUimATSPtFo4bH15vil CvKeRIk0BFh5uyMjVb6Xc6IeiaN/eA2Zi1e0hVyq1mOzkObxUbym7FWy6Kb60iaxbGVHofN UfOGH9BKWg8ai+/08POmLIu3GGXthnKSkmqfJTTWbhCy/pwPW7WLi3nd24km866nw8cvv65 o1SV5KBoUpoFBW+m5RHCA==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:jxQJKhxTg9Q=:yRwPRbEEnUyFS7H6Yna+C0 lUEFRJjAojtta5Mj1XOmNFn8EWKHNRyb8b6dtyZCib5Tk+1XPXJMa+b4bbvzW/QXJUblXP68U 0U/v8VMt53/1pWWMcxVnML7ejgUeCkPnx8DTUj+RTuSuTvhYqQW5CPhpk6UGuZPRFFwMRr70C FUPjfru/2x1w9Sfx2kIBngLv8fqEZcYf062ek+B1IJNMNAzvmY2xnWpFoIpb7buMzfm/JkvDm GFhOIEA/vb3M/aCtr+JenU/ws201RhUrk52sv05qQkYfx8kq3rK66OFSi4blUnqA6p+LDEyXX Qp3fJ7QoUxow9oGXvcoq0vEVOxFjl+c3lhbjE2lXfV9Ghcr0IrDlFN9pKEgOkwKlj76W5bF5c 7OfyGIgIjCQw/BW9/wxufqxtrDR4g6Kym2qhkMx3Fypk8EVcrUi3BoMGcR/Pp6C8E7FuYz9xz 1cI0LcWMKCeb7ieyGqcR6g6P7YRfexXrfbzxcol2J5/xricEhA+E74z0SjfQYROja9wcARvBo hlAHVsSshiiK4tq497617qqRqixk03horx0s0r2AT4Ar2gCNwzFhu+z1077IZ1IjVRVl4Fgjk kxkPAZsv91fHX1V8FLUv8GoAa/YPWiaEgdTNek46X3cJQonXT4sp+rGfdb9LknswSeOPkMYNM kylCqfseCfvNC1Wo8J3ZKfu5pZM6PhYSnHFEGYmCiZVrdIzmbEZ9tI9AntHs7byYIsTbVKNG6 R0gh/3FtbIfPbkTHjw4f0ERRsqZZ+OArIsTMtZqx7+soWYr7O9Pmw6DPkKY=
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/oauth/7-K1sfKIyd0NghntS8AtxU63Cr8>
Subject: [OAUTH-WG] Call for Adoption: OAuth 2.0 Discovery
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/oauth/>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 11:48:46 -0000

Hi all,

this is the call for adoption of OAuth 2.0 Discovery, see
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jones-oauth-discovery-00

Please let us know by Feb 2nd whether you accept / object to the
adoption of this document as a starting point for work in the OAuth
working group.

Note: If you already stated your opinion at the IETF meeting in Yokohama
then you don't need to re-state your opinion, if you want.

The feedback at the Yokohama IETF meeting was the following: 19 for /
zero against / 4 persons need more information.

Ciao
Hannes & Derek