Re: [OAUTH-WG] IPR on OAuth bearer

Eran Hammer <eran@hueniverse.com> Wed, 09 May 2012 19:06 UTC

Return-Path: <eran@hueniverse.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B6DF11E809C for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 May 2012 12:06:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.544
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.544 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.055, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OzrwhdncgpDi for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 May 2012 12:06:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p3plex2out02.prod.phx3.secureserver.net (p3plex2out02.prod.phx3.secureserver.net [184.168.131.14]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A960F11E8081 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 May 2012 12:06:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from P3PWEX2HT002.ex2.secureserver.net ([184.168.131.10]) by p3plex2out02.prod.phx3.secureserver.net with bizsmtp id 7v6J1j0020Dcg9U01v6JGg; Wed, 09 May 2012 12:06:18 -0700
Received: from P3PWEX2MB008.ex2.secureserver.net ([169.254.8.88]) by P3PWEX2HT002.ex2.secureserver.net ([184.168.131.10]) with mapi id 14.02.0247.003; Wed, 9 May 2012 12:06:18 -0700
From: Eran Hammer <eran@hueniverse.com>
To: Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>
Thread-Topic: [OAUTH-WG] IPR on OAuth bearer
Thread-Index: AQHNLgtSd1ClKC8By0eIWfRqfLMBr5bBvE/AgACCdgD//5IooA==
Date: Wed, 09 May 2012 19:06:18 +0000
Message-ID: <0CBAEB56DDB3A140BA8E8C124C04ECA201025F4F@P3PWEX2MB008.ex2.secureserver.net>
References: <0E17EDDE-567A-40BF-9CB9-0D6B757FF0A5@gmx.net> <0CBAEB56DDB3A140BA8E8C124C04ECA2010259C4@P3PWEX2MB008.ex2.secureserver.net> <6CE569CC-091C-456D-8426-FB3200ED4667@gmx.net>
In-Reply-To: <6CE569CC-091C-456D-8426-FB3200ED4667@gmx.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [64.74.213.174]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "oauth@ietf.org WG" <oauth@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] IPR on OAuth bearer
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 May 2012 19:06:20 -0000

So no discussion of this is expected on the list - correct? That's what I wanted to clarify. You asked the WG to "think" about its potential implications but I don't want that "thinking" to happen out-loud on this list...

Raising the issue with your internal IPR team is the right step.

EH

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hannes Tschofenig [mailto:hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2012 11:37 AM
> To: Eran Hammer
> Cc: Hannes Tschofenig; oauth@ietf.org WG
> Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] IPR on OAuth bearer
> 
> Hi Eran,
> 
> if you care about the specification (and want to use it in your products) then
> you may want to reach out to your IPR folks and ask for their judgement.
> They may be able to tell you whether they find the cited IPR applicable and
> whether they had experience with the IPR holder already.
> 
> Ciao
> Hannes
> 
> On May 9, 2012, at 8:51 PM, Eran Hammer wrote:
> 
> > What exactly is the expected WG discussion on this? I hope people here
> are not expected to read the patent and make legal decisions about the
> patent's validity or even applicability as these are questions for lawyers, not
> engineers.
> >
> > EH
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: oauth-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:oauth-bounces@ietf.org] On
> >> Behalf Of Hannes Tschofenig
> >> Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2012 10:44 AM
> >> To: oauth@ietf.org WG
> >> Subject: [OAUTH-WG] IPR on OAuth bearer
> >>
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> an IPR disclosure had been submitted for the OAuth bearer document
> >> recently. In case you may have missed it, here is the link to it:
> >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/1752/
> >>
> >> The ADs will re-run the IETF last call due to this new IPR filing and
> >> we would also like the working group to check the IPR and to think
> >> about potential implications.
> >>
> >> Thanks.
> >>
> >> Ciao
> >> Hannes & Derek
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> OAuth mailing list
> >> OAuth@ietf.org
> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth