Re: [OAUTH-WG] IPR on OAuth bearer
Eran Hammer <eran@hueniverse.com> Wed, 09 May 2012 19:06 UTC
Return-Path: <eran@hueniverse.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B6DF11E809C for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 May 2012 12:06:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.544
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.544 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.055, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OzrwhdncgpDi for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 May 2012 12:06:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p3plex2out02.prod.phx3.secureserver.net (p3plex2out02.prod.phx3.secureserver.net [184.168.131.14]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A960F11E8081 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 May 2012 12:06:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from P3PWEX2HT002.ex2.secureserver.net ([184.168.131.10]) by p3plex2out02.prod.phx3.secureserver.net with bizsmtp id 7v6J1j0020Dcg9U01v6JGg; Wed, 09 May 2012 12:06:18 -0700
Received: from P3PWEX2MB008.ex2.secureserver.net ([169.254.8.88]) by P3PWEX2HT002.ex2.secureserver.net ([184.168.131.10]) with mapi id 14.02.0247.003; Wed, 9 May 2012 12:06:18 -0700
From: Eran Hammer <eran@hueniverse.com>
To: Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>
Thread-Topic: [OAUTH-WG] IPR on OAuth bearer
Thread-Index: AQHNLgtSd1ClKC8By0eIWfRqfLMBr5bBvE/AgACCdgD//5IooA==
Date: Wed, 09 May 2012 19:06:18 +0000
Message-ID: <0CBAEB56DDB3A140BA8E8C124C04ECA201025F4F@P3PWEX2MB008.ex2.secureserver.net>
References: <0E17EDDE-567A-40BF-9CB9-0D6B757FF0A5@gmx.net> <0CBAEB56DDB3A140BA8E8C124C04ECA2010259C4@P3PWEX2MB008.ex2.secureserver.net> <6CE569CC-091C-456D-8426-FB3200ED4667@gmx.net>
In-Reply-To: <6CE569CC-091C-456D-8426-FB3200ED4667@gmx.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [64.74.213.174]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "oauth@ietf.org WG" <oauth@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] IPR on OAuth bearer
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 May 2012 19:06:20 -0000
So no discussion of this is expected on the list - correct? That's what I wanted to clarify. You asked the WG to "think" about its potential implications but I don't want that "thinking" to happen out-loud on this list... Raising the issue with your internal IPR team is the right step. EH > -----Original Message----- > From: Hannes Tschofenig [mailto:hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net] > Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2012 11:37 AM > To: Eran Hammer > Cc: Hannes Tschofenig; oauth@ietf.org WG > Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] IPR on OAuth bearer > > Hi Eran, > > if you care about the specification (and want to use it in your products) then > you may want to reach out to your IPR folks and ask for their judgement. > They may be able to tell you whether they find the cited IPR applicable and > whether they had experience with the IPR holder already. > > Ciao > Hannes > > On May 9, 2012, at 8:51 PM, Eran Hammer wrote: > > > What exactly is the expected WG discussion on this? I hope people here > are not expected to read the patent and make legal decisions about the > patent's validity or even applicability as these are questions for lawyers, not > engineers. > > > > EH > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: oauth-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:oauth-bounces@ietf.org] On > >> Behalf Of Hannes Tschofenig > >> Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2012 10:44 AM > >> To: oauth@ietf.org WG > >> Subject: [OAUTH-WG] IPR on OAuth bearer > >> > >> Hi all, > >> > >> an IPR disclosure had been submitted for the OAuth bearer document > >> recently. In case you may have missed it, here is the link to it: > >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/1752/ > >> > >> The ADs will re-run the IETF last call due to this new IPR filing and > >> we would also like the working group to check the IPR and to think > >> about potential implications. > >> > >> Thanks. > >> > >> Ciao > >> Hannes & Derek > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> OAuth mailing list > >> OAuth@ietf.org > >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
- [OAUTH-WG] IPR on OAuth bearer Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] IPR on OAuth bearer Eran Hammer
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] IPR on OAuth bearer Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] IPR on OAuth bearer Eran Hammer
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] IPR on OAuth bearer Michael Thomas
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] IPR on OAuth bearer Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] IPR on OAuth bearer Eran Hammer
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] IPR on OAuth bearer Eran Hammer
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] IPR on OAuth bearer Michael Thomas
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] IPR on OAuth bearer Stephen Farrell
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] IPR on OAuth bearer Eran Hammer
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] IPR on OAuth bearer Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] IPR on OAuth bearer Michael Thomas
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] IPR on OAuth bearer Stephen Farrell
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] IPR on OAuth bearer Sam Hartman
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] IPR on OAuth bearer William Mills
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] IPR on OAuth bearer Eliot Lear
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] IPR on OAuth bearer Dick Hardt