[OAUTH-WG] Weekly github digest (OAuth Activity Summary)
Repository Activity Summary Bot <do_not_reply@mnot.net> Sun, 01 June 2025 07:42 UTC
Return-Path: <do_not_reply@mnot.net>
X-Original-To: oauth@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: oauth@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 301862F528CC for <oauth@mail2.ietf.org>; Sun, 1 Jun 2025 00:42:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.398
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.398 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (2048-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=mnot.net header.b="PzJHIywA"; dkim=fail (2048-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=messagingengine.com header.b="hTHCV56G"
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ajcqYPoM9rY6 for <oauth@mail2.ietf.org>; Sun, 1 Jun 2025 00:41:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fout-a4-smtp.messagingengine.com (fout-a4-smtp.messagingengine.com [103.168.172.147]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256)) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C42562F52758 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Sun, 1 Jun 2025 00:41:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from phl-compute-02.internal (phl-compute-02.phl.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailfout.phl.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF7A9138030E for <oauth@ietf.org>; Sun, 1 Jun 2025 03:41:53 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from phl-mailfrontend-02 ([10.202.2.163]) by phl-compute-02.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 01 Jun 2025 03:41:53 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mnot.net; h=cc :content-type:content-type:date:from:from:in-reply-to :mime-version:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm2; t= 1748763713; x=1748850113; bh=Z2pxfIfErEFAfx+b4ivwBr48D2sQmBBL8qH QcQk2XCs=; b=PzJHIywAz0SqZipmUvMQmUASyJBFrePONQNno0WcuJUWQcfXscd SkZ9DvEIqipOhieacdxSPUBpl8hmIgtHjso9tP5uVM3B7lK6SKQbLo7FLcVKTKbz esJDO68CF6eBM0PxB3hTNVnOOk4YvStApHlN8gSUOjA5CyasLGPoZlM/kCsIlnoP lxFoJ4smEUh4WyWDRWfClwStoYFE0lcO0gKb9R5fg8Nzif3aUOZ2J31oZ7aE3G58 p8okhcukHh7HYrllaWdvY9IVNFWgkW6eRwjhZeyalpaGysw38kZ/abEXIT6R1wVY H0OBlA8WSGIS5N1ukSObhO6h0jivkIFrcEA==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:content-type:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:mime-version :reply-to:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; t=1748763713; x=1748850113; bh=Z 2pxfIfErEFAfx+b4ivwBr48D2sQmBBL8qHQcQk2XCs=; b=hTHCV56GhKVMjDqCG ipQbUEMVy02WjqCQ1uAqS80BdiH3VIXyEFcXueBwZgav16LVIUBpIZKc1QFTdRY1 2oBiHlqBFfe+7K7Gy59i/E/eP8cuDpDxtY4y0rWkk0kin0ek6Mg1SJxgNmJR4n7i Dsf1UiLQ4boEfq7jg6sdpTJ1mLdcjDZ5Ugk14s72dR+Ne10Go8MKs7cNdB/3xcmQ HdGI7W8nrllHzu+WSzIG3d1Sec5wSFaEL96qy/ASSyQqS7JpktClOZkc6Fb2fJDp bInpmfg4xIqRXLsdf+HHLZOBS9ZHFgGOBEKOFN+p27KR0r/ePrR+zW+sW1dMFVPe AJaYA==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:QQQ8aO08v4tCSqvU0ThIB1wQzq_ZCkNsTe8NxshWMJOuvhumkMT1kw> <xme:QQQ8aBH7m0mcTenRMmJTyTki9WrmEVqkWxbKb57qgKxEtrvcPO2iU-0fbc_C_Ci15 L8-yKqAfqPLKizoDg>
X-ME-Received: <xmr:QQQ8aG6EB6R2AGfIC4BofN-8VS-BGroTNUESJF7jfj0P7Jx7fQZHzXocHsc-ibAUDT2hNYmI_D4zG3_-kWvsaYdYhz8GheNCtedysh2jjSEJ32YcIj65QmgavyF4oiGp35hdp20H>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeeffedrtddtgdefgedvtdculddtuddrgeefvddrtd dtmdcutefuodetggdotefrodftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpggft fghnshhusghstghrihgsvgdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftd dtnecupfhoucgurghtvgcufhhivghlugculdegledmnecujfgurheptggghffvufesrgdt tdertddtjeenucfhrhhomheptfgvphhoshhithhorhihucettghtihhvihhthicuufhumh hmrghrhicuuehothcuoeguohgpnhhothgprhgvphhlhiesmhhnohhtrdhnvghtqeenucgg tffrrghtthgvrhhnpeekfedvudetjedvfeekheeiveeugfefhfetteevgeffkefffeetff dvleehudeiteenucffohhmrghinhepghhithhhuhgsrdgtohhmnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfu ihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepughopghnohhtpghrvghplhihse hmnhhothdrnhgvthdpnhgspghrtghpthhtohepuddpmhhouggvpehsmhhtphhouhhtpdhr tghpthhtohepohgruhhthhesihgvthhfrdhorhhg
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:QQQ8aP2ieVaIhVv1pogMfzDjIyVF7x_SIOr_iaUHUo9LoeI2d2tLEw> <xmx:QQQ8aBF4uf3kvgmR4stS2MyEorhCTQ_wYPD_g1WF0f-RV8fswQvrfg> <xmx:QQQ8aI8Baph9K4ugf-dX-Lvf52rJb9pmyS8ufOJBwVo1kjyjwohsFw> <xmx:QQQ8aGm1-gZZWUrDvYyTsvr-cOObbIES1jrvGad3M8FGinNNXh6WnQ> <xmx:QQQ8aHZkeC7jXgHQMnwW4FCynfs7kV-4NJrI5c3-DtUyTtLRx3x5grtD>
Feedback-ID: i1c3946f2:Fastmail
Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA for <oauth@ietf.org>; Sun, 1 Jun 2025 03:41:53 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="===============6386239712999305265=="
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Repository Activity Summary Bot <do_not_reply@mnot.net>
To: oauth@ietf.org
Message-Id: <20250601074153.C42562F52758@mail2.ietf.org>
Date: Sun, 01 Jun 2025 00:41:53 -0700
Message-ID-Hash: S7Q3WQHZUPY6443BLL7OCKMJ6ORLP7XA
X-Message-ID-Hash: S7Q3WQHZUPY6443BLL7OCKMJ6ORLP7XA
X-MailFrom: do_not_reply@mnot.net
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-oauth.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [OAUTH-WG] Weekly github digest (OAuth Activity Summary)
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/oauth/84OnCSrnxVc5CuwaUo3HtOEI2g8>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/oauth>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:oauth-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:oauth-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:oauth-leave@ietf.org>
Events without label "editorial"
Issues
------
* oauth-wg/oauth-browser-based-apps (+0/-2/š¬3)
2 issues received 3 new comments:
- #88 BFF Operational Considerations (1 by aaronpk)
https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-browser-based-apps/issues/88 [iesg-feedback]
- #87 BFF as an HTTP Proxy (2 by aaronpk)
https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-browser-based-apps/issues/87 [iesg-feedback] [discuss]
2 issues closed:
- BFF as an HTTP Proxy https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-browser-based-apps/issues/87 [iesg-feedback] [discuss]
- BFF Operational Considerations https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-browser-based-apps/issues/88 [iesg-feedback]
* oauth-wg/oauth-sd-jwt-vc (+1/-1/š¬2)
1 issues created:
- Declaration of arrays to the type metadata. Underfined? (by babisRoutis)
https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-sd-jwt-vc/issues/314
2 issues received 2 new comments:
- #309 Update intro text to PID example (1 by danielfett)
https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-sd-jwt-vc/issues/309
- #301 Claim vocabulary for PID? (1 by babisRoutis)
https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-sd-jwt-vc/issues/301
1 issues closed:
- Update intro text to PID example https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-sd-jwt-vc/issues/309
* oauth-wg/oauth-v2-1 (+0/-1/š¬0)
1 issues closed:
- RFC9449 duplicated in Appendix D https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-v2-1/issues/193
* oauth-wg/draft-ietf-oauth-attestation-based-client-auth (+6/-0/š¬4)
6 issues created:
- Editorial - "## Rotation of Client Instance Key" (by Macke)
https://github.com/oauth-wg/draft-ietf-oauth-attestation-based-client-auth/issues/119
- Editorial (by Macke)
https://github.com/oauth-wg/draft-ietf-oauth-attestation-based-client-auth/issues/118
- Editorial - what is a "traditional OAuth2 ecosystem" (by Macke)
https://github.com/oauth-wg/draft-ietf-oauth-attestation-based-client-auth/issues/117
- "transaction" is easily misunderstood (by Macke)
https://github.com/oauth-wg/draft-ietf-oauth-attestation-based-client-auth/issues/116
- Further attest_jwt_client_auth client instance bindings (by panva)
https://github.com/oauth-wg/draft-ietf-oauth-attestation-based-client-auth/issues/114
- Public clients and their interaction with existing OAuth 2.0 extensions vs attest_jwt_client_auth clients (by panva)
https://github.com/oauth-wg/draft-ietf-oauth-attestation-based-client-auth/issues/113
3 issues received 4 new comments:
- #109 Add Authorization Server policy section about "Reuse of a Client Attestation JWT" (1 by Macke)
https://github.com/oauth-wg/draft-ietf-oauth-attestation-based-client-auth/issues/109
- #79 Usage of "public clients" / "deployments traditionally viewed as a public client" (1 by aaronpk)
https://github.com/oauth-wg/draft-ietf-oauth-attestation-based-client-auth/issues/79 [discuss]
- #56 Authorization code binding to client instance (2 by jogu, panva)
https://github.com/oauth-wg/draft-ietf-oauth-attestation-based-client-auth/issues/56
Pull requests
-------------
* oauth-wg/oauth-browser-based-apps (+0/-1/š¬0)
1 pull requests merged:
- Minor edits from mails
https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-browser-based-apps/pull/104
* oauth-wg/oauth-transaction-tokens (+0/-0/š¬1)
1 pull requests received 1 new comments:
- #176 added structured type to HTTP header (1 by bc-pi)
https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-transaction-tokens/pull/176
* oauth-wg/oauth-sd-jwt-vc (+2/-3/š¬3)
2 pull requests submitted:
- dash 10 (by bc-pi)
https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-sd-jwt-vc/pull/313
- Fix section numbering in a few SD-JWT references (by bc-pi)
https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-sd-jwt-vc/pull/312
1 pull requests received 3 new comments:
- #306 Update PID example (3 by bc-pi, danielfett)
https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-sd-jwt-vc/pull/306
3 pull requests merged:
- dash 10
https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-sd-jwt-vc/pull/313
- Fix section numbering in a few SD-JWT references
https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-sd-jwt-vc/pull/312
- Update PID example
https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-sd-jwt-vc/pull/306
* oauth-wg/oauth-selective-disclosure-jwt (+3/-6/š¬1)
3 pull requests submitted:
- fix text that was out of sync with the associated example (by bc-pi)
https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-selective-disclosure-jwt/pull/580
- few more updates for Roman's comments (by bc-pi)
https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-selective-disclosure-jwt/pull/579
- History for 20 (by bc-pi)
https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-selective-disclosure-jwt/pull/578
1 pull requests received 1 new comments:
- #578 History for 20 (1 by danielfett)
https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-selective-disclosure-jwt/pull/578
6 pull requests merged:
- fix text that was out of sync with the associated example
https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-selective-disclosure-jwt/pull/580
- few more updates for Roman's comments
https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-selective-disclosure-jwt/pull/579
- History for 20
https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-selective-disclosure-jwt/pull/578
- assorted IESG comments
https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-selective-disclosure-jwt/pull/577
- reflect some of the AD feedback
https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-selective-disclosure-jwt/pull/575
- changes aimed at addressing one IESG member's feedback
https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-selective-disclosure-jwt/pull/576
* oauth-wg/oauth-v2-1 (+0/-2/š¬0)
2 pull requests merged:
- add client credentials in body change to oauth-2-0-differences
https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-v2-1/pull/207
- remove dupe in and sort #extensions
https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-v2-1/pull/208
* oauth-wg/draft-ietf-oauth-attestation-based-client-auth (+1/-0/š¬0)
1 pull requests submitted:
- update example attestation jwt iss (by panva)
https://github.com/oauth-wg/draft-ietf-oauth-attestation-based-client-auth/pull/115
Repositories tracked by this digest:
-----------------------------------
* https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-browser-based-apps
* https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-identity-chaining
* https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-transaction-tokens
* https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-sd-jwt-vc
* https://github.com/oauth-wg/draft-ietf-oauth-resource-metadata
* https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-cross-device-security
* https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-selective-disclosure-jwt
* https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-v2-1
* https://github.com/oauth-wg/draft-ietf-oauth-status-list
* https://github.com/oauth-wg/draft-ietf-oauth-attestation-based-client-auth
--
To have a summary like this sent to your list, see: https://github.com/ietf-github-services/activity-summary
- [OAUTH-WG] Weekly github digest (OAuth Activity S⦠Repository Activity Summary Bot