[OAUTH-WG] Web apps BCP feedback
Dominick Baier <dbaier@leastprivilege.com> Sat, 25 September 2021 11:07 UTC
Return-Path: <dbaier@leastprivilege.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92BA33A0839 for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 25 Sep 2021 04:07:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=leastprivilege-com.20210112.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oyEFhpMuHLoD for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 25 Sep 2021 04:07:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io1-xd34.google.com (mail-io1-xd34.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d34]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AA3A53A0837 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Sat, 25 Sep 2021 04:07:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io1-xd34.google.com with SMTP id e82so15936213iof.5 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Sat, 25 Sep 2021 04:07:27 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=leastprivilege-com.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112; h=from:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=8SctCPT55fxTCRvk6V3FyISkJdnpqosIcwl15abiwcM=; b=egRi8kSKO1brjPXEa9TvDX6guJmpkTgDcdMbtF3ybSwPV85BTZTzNlg4Gn6fP/2/t2 x15Bah7I9eGU1D/dNkUiDbOhpTw9k6mIP3tS3YR+xfT3lPhKgZael3+ylbjCjo3V/PTW xBUR4WdM85oTGK/Km4ST5Zk1BpVz2655CPH9EBHdXI7T1KNbJMEbFz44yv7QRtZIb/uA dIex8Pzu+L9zPRxKy2KCk7L8FSg4DfhcPIkpBZqsBJBIsHHR2fkW2T0TGIMKCywHPkRl sPVClVdrXHeR3JlGVdpXEi/QYIP36ipBLqpx0wAmiNE1d6x/OdXMdubDfx1RrghYdRT7 RHaw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=8SctCPT55fxTCRvk6V3FyISkJdnpqosIcwl15abiwcM=; b=CPI9ch2ndq0t7VBBHorFpOQl1AiRW9j/+qHdmO7qzhxVXcoxaBUz1V4YHRACdleFOG XRiSA8aaUxLLTYDbvSk6NKMMIzN0xn46M/+soJE91ZJeHMhEtf4hts0KGZUQ8/5T2s17 oqWEXuRrcHOwGYyjPa/IhFfcuRDxj98uYsvzI7oFbGecMJE45W+EzuFwnnIcvU32xY3u 7kTtVb7bUX/krJqXMC67LBFoWTjjZl/8fg1dt6UDRupI38+3y433wGYgm9QTWR2JVRYl feBm7LC8hv7KkLgqhKye0x+bp9oHBJkrG9YoByClyZJ+5iyUcDdTt7MhsqlXvZDwyeBr mfdw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533WrHxN1A3IsOgqzqbIxv0bU/pceTvJ/phcpX4ZEEJQi+8Iaz4V H+u0AdWAQaHEVRSXTbH/qFYTgUyIlxHv6WK9bgBi2RmNCg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyyJcOLA6LHWWxPyhnRK61+gO1OfCsLOuIIlurM2hRwSrQPPIZlAykKY+oFfOVtmRqIjrb0t/gZItcn9eLt8o8=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6602:2c0f:: with SMTP id w15mr13276835iov.106.1632568046329; Sat, 25 Sep 2021 04:07:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 1058052472880 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Sat, 25 Sep 2021 04:07:25 -0700
From: Dominick Baier <dbaier@leastprivilege.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2021 04:07:25 -0700
Message-ID: <CAO7Ng+sEnFxdVhwqc0YmAhWv2k48_KfreS_m_uXH=xeA9HZEOQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: oauth <oauth@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000793c1e05cccfde11"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/oauth/8JmlOLvJowixxpBheK9JBjOaTCw>
Subject: [OAUTH-WG] Web apps BCP feedback
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/oauth/>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2021 11:07:30 -0000
In 6.1 it says
"Additionally, the SameSite cookie attribute can be used to
prevent CSRF attacks, or alternatively, the application and API could
be written to use anti-CSRF tokens.”
“Prevent” is a bit strong.
SameSite only restricts cookies sent across site boundaries Iit does not
prevent CSRF attacks from within a site boundary. Scenarios could be a
compromised sub-domain, like sub-domain takeover or just some vulnerable
application co-located on the same site.
thanks
———
Dominick Baier
- [OAUTH-WG] Web apps BCP feedback Dominick Baier
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Web apps BCP feedback Jim Manico
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Web apps BCP feedback Neil Madden
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Web apps BCP feedback Jim Manico
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Web apps BCP feedback Philippe De Ryck
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Web apps BCP feedback Neil Madden
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Web apps BCP feedback Jim Manico
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Web apps BCP feedback Neil Madden
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Web apps BCP feedback Thomas Broyer