[OAUTH-WG] Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-oauth-saml2-bearer-21: (with COMMENT)

["Benoit Claise" <[e-mail]>]

Benoit Claise has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-oauth-saml2-bearer-21: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to http://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-oauth-saml2-bearer/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I cleared my DISCUSS on the basis that RFC 6755 will be moved to an
informative reference in response to this process issue: IDnits complains
of a normative reference to Informational document RFC 6755, which was
not noted in the Last Call announcement.


Editorial Nits:

S2.2: The paragraph before the actual example uses terminology
inconsistent with RFC 6749:

 s/authorization code grant/authorization grant/