[OAUTH-WG] [IANA #1216703] Expert Review for draft-ietf-oauth-iss-auth-resp (oauth-parameters)

Amanda Baber via RT <drafts-expert-review-comment@iana.org> Wed, 24 November 2021 21:27 UTC

Return-Path: <iana-shared@icann.org>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C84E3A0C3C; Wed, 24 Nov 2021 13:27:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.629
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.629 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, MISSING_HEADERS=1.021, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Pi494AYBj7_p; Wed, 24 Nov 2021 13:27:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp.lax.icann.org (smtp.lax.icann.org []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9CBF53A0C39; Wed, 24 Nov 2021 13:27:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from request4.lax.icann.org (request1.lax.icann.org []) by smtp.lax.icann.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42403E493E; Wed, 24 Nov 2021 21:27:26 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by request4.lax.icann.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 1DF262070E; Wed, 24 Nov 2021 21:27:26 +0000 (UTC)
RT-Owner: michelle.cotton
From: Amanda Baber via RT <drafts-expert-review-comment@iana.org>
Reply-To: drafts-expert-review-comment@iana.org
In-Reply-To: <rt-4.4.3-1915-1637096963-365.1216703-9-0@icann.org>
References: <RT-Ticket-1216703@icann.org> <rt-4.4.3-1907-1637090376-1238.1216703-9-0@icann.org> <rt-4.4.3-1915-1637096963-365.1216703-9-0@icann.org>
Message-ID: <rt-4.4.3-13191-1637789246-759.1216703-9-0@icann.org>
X-RT-Loop-Prevention: IANA
X-RT-Ticket: IANA #1216703
X-Managed-BY: RT 4.4.3 (http://www.bestpractical.com/rt/)
X-RT-Originator: amanda.baber@icann.org
CC: ve7jtb@ve7jtb.com, oauth@ietf.org, oauth-ext-review@ietf.org, nat@sakimura.org, michael.jones@microsoft.com, dick.hardt@gmail.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
X-RT-Original-Encoding: utf-8
Precedence: bulk
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2021 21:27:26 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/oauth/8VL0ClEJydnSuwOSqlBFs8K3NBE>
Subject: [OAUTH-WG] [IANA #1216703] Expert Review for draft-ietf-oauth-iss-auth-resp (oauth-parameters)
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/oauth/>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2021 21:27:31 -0000

Attn: Michael, Nat, John and Dick (OAuth Authorization Server Metadata registry experts)

I'm resending a review request for a document that's listed on the next IESG telechat. Can you get to this before 12/2?

Please let us know if approval from all four experts is required.


Amanda Baber
IANA Operations Manager

On Tue Nov 16 21:09:23 2021, michelle.cotton wrote:
> Mailing List/Expert Review requested
> Attn: Michael, Nat, John and Dick (OAuth Authorization Server Metadata
> registry experts)
> As the designated experts for the OAuth Authorization Server Metadata
> registry, can you review the proposed registration in draft-oauth-iss-
> auth-resp for us? Please see:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-oauth-iss-auth-resp/
> A single, new registration is being requested:
> Metadata Name: authorization_response_iss_parameter_supported
> Metadata Description: Boolean value indicating whether the
> authorization server provides the iss parameter in the authorization
> response.
> Change Controller: IESG
> Reference: [ RFC-to-be; Section 3 ]
> If this is request is OK, when the IESG approves the document for
> publication, we'll make the registration at
> https://www.iana.org/assignments/oauth-parameters/
> If you're the first expert to submit a review, please let us know
> whether you want us to wait for both reviewers to respond before we
> mark the document "IANA OK" (or send your comments to the authors, if
> the registrations aren't OK).
> The IESG has asked us to set a two-week deadline for registration
> reviews. The due date for this request is 2021-11-30.
> Thank you,
> Michelle Cotton
> IANA Services