IETF Logo Mail Archive

[OAUTH-WG] CORRECTION: Re: Basic signature support in the core specification

Igor Faynberg <igor.faynberg@alcatel-lucent.com> Mon, 27 September 2010 17:00 UTC

Return-Path: <igor.faynberg@alcatel-lucent.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC7E53A6D5C for <oauth@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 10:00:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.395
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.395 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.204, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id L35Xp9Tb9qWC for <oauth@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 10:00:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ihemail2.lucent.com (ihemail2.lucent.com [135.245.0.35]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBCB73A6B96 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 10:00:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from umail.lucent.com (h135-3-40-63.lucent.com [135.3.40.63]) by ihemail2.lucent.com (8.13.8/IER-o) with ESMTP id o8RH1Y5Z011107 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 27 Sep 2010 12:01:34 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from [135.222.134.173] (faynberg-c1.mh.lucent.com [135.222.134.173]) by umail.lucent.com (8.13.8/TPES) with ESMTP id o8RH1Ypf011799; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 12:01:34 -0500 (CDT)
Message-ID: <4CA0CDEE.1000703@alcatel-lucent.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 13:01:34 -0400
From: Igor Faynberg <igor.faynberg@alcatel-lucent.com>
Organization: Alcatel-Lucent
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Windows/20100228)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: igor.faynberg@alcatel-lucent.com
References: <C8C2AB33.3AD38%eran@hueniverse.com> <BFD0447E-42BB-441F-A7B3-B0CFB0F6317B@gmail.com> <E0B0A685-4BA7-451B-B0DF-C0FC429595D1@xmlgrrl.com> <4CA0C96E.8090907@alcatel-lucent.com>
In-Reply-To: <4CA0C96E.8090907@alcatel-lucent.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.57 on 135.245.2.35
Cc: OAuth WG <oauth@ietf.org>
Subject: [OAUTH-WG] CORRECTION: Re: Basic signature support in the core specification
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: igor.faynberg@alcatel-lucent.com
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 17:00:57 -0000

I mistyped, and just noticed that it looked strange.  I meant to type:
Igor Faynberg wrote:
> ...
> But if both the OAuth signatures and the OAuth core specifications are 
> complete and going for approval at the same time, why not actually 
> have them in the same spec, especially given that THE (not "we") 
> experts who have agreed working on this and ARE working on this?
>
> Igor
>
>
>
>>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email