[OAUTH-WG] Authentication Methods

Elliot Cameron <elliot.cameron@covenanteyes.com> Wed, 02 November 2011 20:59 UTC

Return-Path: <elliot.cameron@covenanteyes.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1B5111E817E for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Nov 2011 13:59:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.486
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.486 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_32=1.778, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tntv5TUBuvmG for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Nov 2011 13:59:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from email.covenanteyes.com (email.covenanteyes.com [69.41.14.22]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16EA611E817C for <oauth@ietf.org>; Wed, 2 Nov 2011 13:59:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by email.covenanteyes.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 689AE64E718 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Wed, 2 Nov 2011 16:59:25 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at covenanteyes.com
Received: from email.covenanteyes.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (email.covenanteyes.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id D+MqZv8HUKuL for <oauth@ietf.org>; Wed, 2 Nov 2011 16:59:25 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from email.covenanteyes.com (email.covenanteyes.com [69.41.14.22]) by email.covenanteyes.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28B8964E710 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Wed, 2 Nov 2011 16:59:25 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2011 16:59:25 -0400
From: Elliot Cameron <elliot.cameron@covenanteyes.com>
To: oauth@ietf.org
Message-ID: <079275cb-f23c-46de-92c6-fc308ad2e1eb@email.covenanteyes.com>
In-Reply-To: <d1d379e5-67d7-4c3a-9228-4af00dc06845@email.covenanteyes.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_973e56ac-6a4c-410b-9c22-8a7b88099a30"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Originating-IP: [69.41.14.130]
X-Mailer: Zimbra 7.1.2_GA_3268 (ZimbraWebClient - SAF3 (Linux)/7.1.2_GA_3268)
Subject: [OAUTH-WG] Authentication Methods
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2011 21:02:39 -0000

What are some common or suggested authentication methods that are used in conjunction with OAuth 2.0? 
Is TLS/SSL the only standard one or do people normally roll their own authentication within OAuth's flows? 




Elliot Cameron 
Covenant Eyes Software Developer 
elliot.cameron@covenanteyes.com 
810-771-8322 

Call 810-771-8322 


Phone to call with 

Covenant Eyes 








Connect