IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Why OAuth it self is not an authentication framework ?

John Bradley <ve7jtb@ve7jtb.com> Tue, 05 February 2013 20:36 UTC

Return-Path: <ve7jtb@ve7jtb.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1D8521F8625 for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Feb 2013 12:36:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id y9phUg3hClkE for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Feb 2013 12:36:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-oa0-f45.google.com (mail-oa0-f45.google.com [209.85.219.45]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BCC521F8534 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Feb 2013 12:36:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-oa0-f45.google.com with SMTP id o6so706362oag.18 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Tue, 05 Feb 2013 12:36:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :cc:message-id:references:to:x-mailer:x-gm-message-state; bh=Sz1LjBhV0sPyItRXUZFXe97mOrRsiYEhjwAVtD+L87g=; b=dqB778msl2zAfCPj3ZT/AuTdjTor6T9bA0nBwZBWNR2pFUq2/fodJZFJsGY3Rf1Klo 1/ErmCelTrQN+P9DFq26ELvwquY9R9C5k25jnt6PTUJakSxjKLT2V4vBlBthZYr5Gaa2 jRLAum0YMJ1WF2oWUTLfLUEbMCnaGP7/PnnfKFP3/c7rPd6HWulevam495tplZ3+uzQm wVH11vPoTPRX+cAMcOp58731O0we/6FnhNZpgCtWCIUCkzLw7La5BW0iEtcHL3Su9LTH +EL3F+YV7CmU12xp3afy18VjAn9JdGHvOikaWepGeT/e77yXrHT8C9eRUbximHH4O4jS FoMA==
X-Received: by 10.60.21.133 with SMTP id v5mr20484745oee.69.1360096596746; Tue, 05 Feb 2013 12:36:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.37.15.80] ([96.8.44.21]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id y4sm26996505oea.7.2013.02.05.12.36.33 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 05 Feb 2013 12:36:35 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_742B83E9-3E8E-4DB1-AA27-7A1707626E4D"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.2 \(1499\))
From: John Bradley <ve7jtb@ve7jtb.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAJV9qO_J1-AhGB=XST0R-kwAd-9hjUbCJ4ieBPoE_OMe760mqg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2013 13:36:32 -0700
Message-Id: <73B7EC23-AA93-42EE-B3EB-35BA1B82558F@ve7jtb.com>
References: <CAJV9qO_J1-AhGB=XST0R-kwAd-9hjUbCJ4ieBPoE_OMe760mqg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Prabath Siriwardena <prabath@wso2.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1499)
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQk5A+oNOWgnt8Q6PYCkQx70T+tpi2ifS2JufwdMpTR5Y3fJM5FPUH7XRRKKfx1tXylw5K9b
Cc: "oauth@ietf.org WG" <oauth@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Why OAuth it self is not an authentication framework ?
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2013 20:36:38 -0000

OAuth is an Authorization protocol as many of us have pointed out.

The post is largely correct and based on one of mine.

John B.

On 2013-02-05, at 12:52 PM, Prabath Siriwardena <prabath@wso2.com> wrote:

> FYI and for your comments..
> 
> http://blog.facilelogin.com/2013/02/why-oauth-it-self-is-not-authentication.html
>  
> Thanks & Regards,
> Prabath
> 
> Mobile : +94 71 809 6732 
> 
> http://blog.facilelogin.com
> http://RampartFAQ.com
> _______________________________________________
> OAuth mailing list
> OAuth@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email