Return-Path: X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3CDA1A88B2 for ; Tue, 20 Oct 2015 10:01:35 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.209 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.209 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FREEMAIL_REPLYTO_END_DIGIT=0.25, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eIznyPsMZSFy for ; Tue, 20 Oct 2015 10:01:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nm25-vm1.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com (nm25-vm1.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com [98.139.212.155]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A1F241A92F5 for ; Tue, 20 Oct 2015 10:01:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1445360474; bh=hktuvKnJh48MOCPspGrqaAWaycxlfK4Gnt7J4ozqQfk=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:From:Subject; b=LucQGm3PJQS89FLhCMPQbeVyyCqGBka94BsmAQY09bd3kFgF48gEcOBJz7yh0q1EJpU99q858OW30jFvTItEkg1gt6JVppU5/0VF1Hry/EoJTf3Y6hfpZZC7iBmc9zQChujYSxifZgjkelz+i/txuMdk/YlekFyLDWkvlYlAbHXYUPm0KiAoXhHQkfrlOl1OTihR0P2N2+8WJJhCYKTbh2eEWF43fxFeyjiNTiVUw8Viccmus/cIBsYyNQmO73tSSZ1tQqQ/sJw2FePprFJt4THBqPrk8kaRyOgLulFxuKK1HqT1fbxaBTez2yEHoaWosNrs0092JpjlLbIqmSE7Ww== Received: from [66.196.81.173] by nm25.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 20 Oct 2015 17:01:14 -0000 Received: from [98.139.215.249] by tm19.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 20 Oct 2015 17:01:14 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1062.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 20 Oct 2015 17:01:14 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 571290.3220.bm@omp1062.mail.bf1.yahoo.com X-YMail-OSG: dKvetewVM1nlhYQTW6RpOdyTONzfM2lHckEhaIocHCOSl9GT7kTU9jYq6tI1bLl VMz9cWt2TNje.Iuvkn0QLxET6qd4cjPBk8GM54Ne_NP_VPPadlJI2O1Y1ejtnvFTPxXo.048HcGK S6BFNxlT7MOvwI9JtD8hUM_uF37Nizoo_3IG.KjyT1HAI7dJ_882GaxlK_4jGNBVvml_frRlV75L TTtmKHGdSfRKn9ceU0C_V8r_Yn7tEJwDTC.89TBtTLWV3ndj7oZSY1y4pdprr5J7H_ltbl7Tgkg1 qkTlQNQ5s1BeU9IRcpf2PRCoQVq9Y4zv5ILmwnAoLtTWrp6txuI6FPItUMUxlJtO3AUW3on8TUvn nXJ3.4HwG1bGm7ql7FiRXfZmhxAEQ4gAZA32qU9IBBAkuZcuw6n4jwBeuBlLaxrGkY2yWv5zB_Il egw7vtvhNPfnYl36Ytxv1Oil1.GnU1H80wz5EVTMVNUMnsfWANRtkDglUYWbjYndzwIQ9sDzH1Hx 7W4ZE0VuWm_cOLhSjknQQU9ivD9ZLtnRovJCzocaSEg0dudqTnP8- Received: by 66.196.81.116; Tue, 20 Oct 2015 17:01:14 +0000 Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2015 17:01:13 +0000 (UTC) From: Bill Mills To: Hannes Tschofenig Message-ID: <1347108524.394636.1445360473788.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <5625EEFD.1000109@gmx.net> References: <5625EEFD.1000109@gmx.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_394635_996499596.1445360473783" Archived-At: Cc: "oauth@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] PoP Architecture - IPR Confirmation X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list Reply-To: Bill Mills List-Id: OAUTH WG List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2015 17:01:35 -0000 ------=_Part_394635_996499596.1445360473783 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I am still aware of no IPR related to=C2=A0https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ie= tf-oauth-pop-architecture-02.txt=20 On Tuesday, October 20, 2015 12:37 AM, Hannes Tschofenig wrote: =20 Hi Bill, sorry to bother you again regarding this IPR issue but when I search through the OAuth mailing list archive then I cannot find a response from you to this mail from Kepeng: http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth/current/msg14980.html Ciao Hannes PS: I only see a single response from you on the list http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth/current/maillist.html, namely this email: http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth/current/msg15002.html Unfortunately, that mail was a call for IPR confirmation to the 'Proof-of-Possession Key Semantics for JSON Web Tokens (JWTs)' specificatio= n (draft-ietf-oauth-proof-of-possession-04) and not to the architecture draft. On 10/09/2015 02:55 AM, Bill Mills wrote: > I responded correctly Thursday. >=20 >=20 >=20 > On Thursday, October 8, 2015 5:48 PM, Hannes Tschofenig > wrote: >=20 >=20 > Hi Bill, >=20 > you have unfortunately responded to the wrong mail ;-) >=20 > Please respond to this one: > http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth/current/msg14980.html > (which is about the PoP architecture > ). >=20 > Sorry to bother you with these issues. >=20 > Ciao > Hannes >=20 > On 09/30/2015 04:10 PM, Bill Mills wrote: >> I am aware of no IPR issues for this document. >> >> Regards, >> >> -bill >> >> >> >> On Wednesday, September 30, 2015 3:53 AM, John Bradley >> > wrote: >> >> >> I confirm that I know of no IPR that reads on this specification. >> >> John Bradley=E2=80=99 >> >>> On Sep 30, 2015, at 7:03 AM, Kepeng Li >>> >> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Mike, John and Hannes, >>> I am working on the shepherd writeup for the PoP document: >>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-oauth-proof-of-possession-04 >>> >>> One item in the template requires me to indicate whether each document >>> author has confirmed that any and all appropriate IPR disclosures >>> required for full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79 >>> have already been filed. Could you please confirm? Kind Regards >>> Kepeng >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> OAuth mailing list >> OAuth@ietf.org > >=20 >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> OAuth mailing list >> OAuth@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth >> >=20 >=20 ------=_Part_394635_996499596.1445360473783 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable



On Tues= day, October 20, 2015 12:37 AM, Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx= .net> wrote:


Hi Bill,

sorry to bother you again re= garding this IPR issue but when I search
through the OAut= h mailing list archive then I cannot find a response
from= you to this mail from Kepeng:
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth/current/msg14980.html

Ciao
Hannes

PS: I only see a single response from you o= n the list
http://www= .ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth/current/maillist.html, namely
this email:
= http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth/current/msg15002.html

Unfortunately, that mail was a call for IPR = confirmation to the
'Proof-of-Possession Key Semantics fo= r JSON Web Tokens (JWTs)' specification
(draft-ietf-oauth= -proof-of-possession-04) and not to the architecture
draf= t.

On 10/09/2015 02:55 AM, Bill Mills = wrote:
> I responded correctly Thursday.
>
>
>
> On Thursday, October 8, 2015 5:48 PM, Hannes Tschofenig
> <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net&= gt; wrote:
>
>
> Hi Bill,
>
> you have unf= ortunately responded to the wrong mail ;-)
>
> Please respond to this one:
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth/curre= nt/msg14980.html
> (which is about the PoP archite= cture
> <draft-ietf-oauth-pop-architecture-02.txt&g= t;).
>
> Sorry to bother you wit= h these issues.
>
> Ciao
> Hannes
>
> On 09= /30/2015 04:10 PM, Bill Mills wrote:
>> I am aware = of no IPR issues for this document.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>&g= t; -bill
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wednesday, September 30, 2015 = 3:53 AM, John Bradley
>> <ve7jtb@v= e7jtb.com <mailto:ve7jtb@ve7jtb.com>> wrote:=
>>
>>
&g= t;> I confirm that I know of no IPR that reads on this specification.>>
>> John Bradley=E2=80=99>>
>>> On Sep 30, 2015, a= t 7:03 AM, Kepeng Li <kepeng.lkp@alibaba= -inc.com
> <mailto:kepeng.lkp@alibaba-inc.com>
>>> <m= ailto:kepeng.lkp@alibaba-inc.com
> <mailto:kepeng.lkp@ali= baba-inc.com>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Mike, John and Hannes,
>>= > I am working on the shepherd writeup for the PoP document:
>>> http://tools.ietf.= org/html/draft-ietf-oauth-proof-of-possession-04
>= >> <https://www.ietf.org/id/dra= ft-ietf-oauth-pop-architecture-02.txt>
>>>= ; One item in the template requires me to indicate whether each document>>> author has confirmed that any and all appropri= ate IPR disclosures
>>> required for full confor= mance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79
>>&g= t; have already been filed. Could you please confirm? Kind Regards
>>> Kepeng
>>>
>>
>>
>> ________= _______________________________________
>> OAuth ma= iling list
>> OAuth@ietf.org <mailto= :OAuth@ietf.org> <mailto:OAuth@ietf.org
> <mailto:OAuth@ietf.org>>
>
>> https://www.ietf.org/= mailman/listinfo/oauth
>>
>>
>= >
>>
>> ________________= _______________________________
>> OAuth mailing li= st
>> OAuth@ietf.org <mailto:OAuth@ietf.org>
>> https://= www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
>>
>
>


------=_Part_394635_996499596.1445360473783--