Return-Path: X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95CD91A8942 for ; Sun, 13 Dec 2015 20:08:04 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.001 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JdRZ3w7563ZC for ; Sun, 13 Dec 2015 20:08:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from na01-by2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-by2on0104.outbound.protection.outlook.com [207.46.100.104]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9A6F71A8848 for ; Sun, 13 Dec 2015 20:08:00 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=selector1; h=From:To:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=3xK8cOoHuUJq878pjAaMuI4tm6D+4t59L/nN+mFihgI=; b=PWv3aBRzCLj4EPmRL4vgothvKDJCRYlC3IsmcuxcJRgsv9sPTOLBUECYT/z0O4luxkGF7mt4FpILMYkvWBnW7W7GVQ0M4yT4ZaNY5yx8IYv327oNQUs30YwIKsY273r7ngctU9/KuI0gL1YjYltjRjbDWrPrn8dbwA/bWRlb/6U= Received: from BY2PR03MB442.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.141.141.145) by BY2PR03MB441.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.141.141.142) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.355.16; Mon, 14 Dec 2015 04:07:58 +0000 Received: from BY2PR03MB442.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([10.141.141.145]) by BY2PR03MB442.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([10.141.141.145]) with mapi id 15.01.0355.012; Mon, 14 Dec 2015 04:07:58 +0000 From: Mike Jones To: "Manger, James" , Kathleen Moriarty , "oauth@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: [OAUTH-WG] implementations of draft-ietf-oauth-proof-of-possession Thread-Index: AQHRNiRw/3FJeypoUkyGZPCG7cxomZ7J3VGA Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2015 04:07:58 +0000 Message-ID: References: <255B9BB34FB7D647A506DC292726F6E13BB4EA5AD2@WSMSG3153V.srv.dir.telstra.com> In-Reply-To: <255B9BB34FB7D647A506DC292726F6E13BB4EA5AD2@WSMSG3153V.srv.dir.telstra.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=Michael.Jones@microsoft.com; x-originating-ip: [188.92.133.18] x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; BY2PR03MB441; 5:Nf6ZybIVqj+5CS0wIN2Rh7IWD4U6TUm4T8vCZzbVLK1rGyYbtqO4ZkzjabIx7AGkChzOXPAi8YE98PAu+aJ5SeIHWhIA5oguWf79LnBgh1euRXRqpkaI/ulQDrLO2aY/vErXU/8OjCOhnyfovsJaFg==; 24:W/ryAxzgFKdbk+zGkje/32Ff6xDNOhKanL3ZXU4BsnYJ5mAK/0+O0VPPL8ST48mjGawpCLWlXJ5ekqcFXVA31Ut3TQ5tq3yEhoJGbw8YJUE= x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:BY2PR03MB441; x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:; x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(61425038)(601004)(2401047)(5005006)(520078)(8121501046)(3002001)(10201501046)(61426038)(61427038); SRVR:BY2PR03MB441; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:BY2PR03MB441; x-forefront-prvs: 0790FB1F33 x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(13464003)(199003)(52604005)(377454003)(43784003)(189002)(189998001)(50986999)(97736004)(54356999)(15975445007)(2900100001)(76576001)(81156007)(87936001)(2501003)(1220700001)(6116002)(3846002)(586003)(102836003)(122556002)(1096002)(77096005)(790700001)(92566002)(16601075003)(40100003)(86612001)(5001770100001)(33656002)(5001960100002)(5002640100001)(11100500001)(99286002)(19580395003)(5008740100001)(66066001)(74316001)(106356001)(2950100001)(106116001)(105586002)(76176999)(107886002)(10290500002)(16236675004)(86362001)(10090500001)(19580405001)(19300405004)(5003600100002)(19625215002)(5005710100001)(8990500004)(19617315012)(10400500002)(101416001)(230783001)(5004730100002)(7059030); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:BY2PR03MB441; H:BY2PR03MB442.namprd03.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1; LANG:en; received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: microsoft.com does not designate permitted sender hosts) spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:23 spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_BY2PR03MB44269B105305F4246D0563DF5ED0BY2PR03MB442namprd_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: microsoft.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 14 Dec 2015 04:07:58.5840 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 72f988bf-86f1-41af-91ab-2d7cd011db47 X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BY2PR03MB441 Archived-At: Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] implementations of draft-ietf-oauth-proof-of-possession X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: OAUTH WG List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2015 04:08:04 -0000 --_000_BY2PR03MB44269B105305F4246D0563DF5ED0BY2PR03MB442namprd_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Good eye, James! Thanks for catching this. I'll fix it right away. It turns out that examples are based on the trace captured in February 2013= - well before the Xbox One launch in November 2013. I'd actually noticed = this then and had Xbox correct their code. But silly me, I failed to unifo= rmly correct it in the draft. Thanks again! -- Mike From: Manger, James [mailto:James.H.Manger@team.telstra.com] Sent: Sunday, December 13, 2015 8:04 PM To: Mike Jones ; Kathleen Moriarty ; oauth@ietf.org Subject: RE: [OAUTH-WG] implementations of draft-ietf-oauth-proof-of-posses= sion That value uses strings for expiry and not-before dates so it is not a vali= d JWT; these dates need to be numbers. 3 of the examples in draft-ietf-oauth-proof-of-possession are similarly inv= alid ("exp" and "iat"); 1 example gets it right. -- James Manger -----Original Message----- From: OAuth [mailto:oauth-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Mike Jones Sent: Monday, 14 December 2015 2:40 PM To: Kathleen Moriarty >; oauth@ietf.org Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] implementations of draft-ietf-oauth-proof-of-posses= sion Yes. Xbox One and its partners have been using this since its launch. The= following token claims are from a production trace captured in early 2013: { "iss":"xas.xboxlive.com", "aud":"http://auth.xboxlive.com", "exp":"1361398824", "nbf":"1360189224", "cnf":{ "jwk":{ "kty":"EC", "use":"sig", "crv":"P-256", "x":"18wHLeIgW9wVN6VD1Txgpqy2LszYkMf6J8njVAibvhM", "y":"-V4dS4UaLMgP_4fY4j8ir7cl1TXlFdAgcx55o7TkcSA" } } } -- Mike -----Original Message----- From: OAuth [mailto:oauth-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Kathleen Moriarty Sent: Sunday, December 13, 2015 7:14 PM To: oauth@ietf.org Subject: [OAUTH-WG] implementations of draft-ietf-oauth-proof-of-possession Hi, Are there any implementations of draft-ietf-oauth-proof-of-possession? Thanks! -- Best regards, Kathleen _______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth _______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth --_000_BY2PR03MB44269B105305F4246D0563DF5ED0BY2PR03MB442namprd_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Good eye, James! = Thanks for catching this.  I’ll fix it right away.

 

It turns out that exam= ples are based on the trace captured in February 2013 – well before t= he Xbox One launch in November 2013.  I’d actually noticed this = then and had Xbox correct their code.  But silly me, I failed to uniformly correct it in the draft.

 

   &nbs= p;            &= nbsp;           &nbs= p;            &= nbsp;           &nbs= p;    Thanks again!

   &nbs= p;            &= nbsp;           &nbs= p;            &= nbsp;           &nbs= p;    -- Mike

 

From: Manger, James [mailto:James.H.Manger@te= am.telstra.com]
Sent: Sunday, December 13, 2015 8:04 PM
To: Mike Jones <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com>; Kathleen Moriart= y <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>; oauth@ietf.org
Subject: RE: [OAUTH-WG] implementations of draft-ietf-oauth-proof-of= -possession

 

That value uses strings for = expiry and not-before dates so it is not a valid JWT; these dates need to b= e numbers.

 

3 of the examples in draft-i= etf-oauth-proof-of-possession are similarly invalid (“exp” and = “iat”); 1 example gets it right.

 

--

James Manger

 

-----O= riginal Message-----
From: OAuth [mailto:oauth-bounces= @ietf.org] On Behalf Of Mike Jones
Sent: Monday, 14 December 2015 2:40 PM
To: Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>; oauth@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] implementations of draft-ietf-oauth-proof-of-posses= sion

 

Yes.  Xbox One and its = partners have been using this since its launch.  The following token c= laims are from a production trace captured in early 2013:=

 

  {

   "iss":"xas.xboxlive.com",

   "aud":"= http://auth.xboxlive.= com",

   "exp":"1361398824",

   "nbf":"1360189224",

   "cnf":{

     "jwk":{

       "kty":"EC",

       "use":"sig",

       "crv":"P-256",<= o:p>

       "x":"18wHLeIgW9wVN6V= D1Txgpqy2LszYkMf6J8njVAibvhM",

       "y":"-V4dS4UaLMgP_4f= Y4j8ir7cl1TXlFdAgcx55o7TkcSA"

      }

    }

  }

 

    &nbs= p;            &= nbsp;           &nbs= p;            &= nbsp;           &nbs= p;         -- Mike

 

-----Original Message-----

From: OAuth [mailto:oauth-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Kathleen Moria= rty

Sent: Sunday, December 13, 2= 015 7:14 PM

To: oauth@ietf.= org

Subject: [OAUTH-WG] implemen= tations of draft-ietf-oauth-proof-of-possession

 

Hi,

 

Are there any implementation= s of  draft-ietf-oauth-proof-of-possession?

 

Thanks!

 

--

 

Best regards,

Kathleen

 

____________________________= ___________________

OAuth mailing list

OAuth@ietf.org<= /span>

https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth

 

____________________________= ___________________

OAuth mailing list

OAuth@ietf.org<= /span>

https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth

--_000_BY2PR03MB44269B105305F4246D0563DF5ED0BY2PR03MB442namprd_--