Re: [OAUTH-WG] IETF 95 - Buenos Aires

"Phil Hunt (IDM)" <phil.hunt@oracle.com> Mon, 18 January 2016 06:13 UTC

Return-Path: <phil.hunt@oracle.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B2F41B2AC8 for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 17 Jan 2016 22:13:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JmztH328Tzlj for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 17 Jan 2016 22:13:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from aserp1040.oracle.com (aserp1040.oracle.com [141.146.126.69]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 099051B2AC6 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Sun, 17 Jan 2016 22:13:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from userv0022.oracle.com (userv0022.oracle.com [156.151.31.74]) by aserp1040.oracle.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.2/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.2) with ESMTP id u0I6DLg9011062 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 18 Jan 2016 06:13:22 GMT
Received: from aserv0121.oracle.com (aserv0121.oracle.com [141.146.126.235]) by userv0022.oracle.com (8.14.4/8.13.8) with ESMTP id u0I6DLgq021613 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 18 Jan 2016 06:13:21 GMT
Received: from abhmp0019.oracle.com (abhmp0019.oracle.com [141.146.116.25]) by aserv0121.oracle.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id u0I6DLwp000485; Mon, 18 Jan 2016 06:13:21 GMT
Received: from [192.168.1.23] (/174.7.250.104) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Sun, 17 Jan 2016 22:13:21 -0800
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-0544FB12-03E9-47D3-9FA5-06D7789A21BF
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
From: "Phil Hunt (IDM)" <phil.hunt@oracle.com>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (13C75)
In-Reply-To: <BN3PR0301MB1234DE8BA0D31AEE8321B3C8A6C00@BN3PR0301MB1234.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Jan 2016 22:13:18 -0800
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <67DFA9BA-CC42-414E-B88A-A6943ECD8DA4@oracle.com>
References: <5698D322.6030206@gmx.net> <98165008-9094-4FF4-8627-4B1CBE014939@ve7jtb.com> <5698FE08.8020804@gmx.net> <CA+k3eCSqy=d3hzX1m2Arrc=UDh5hv4rbi5eq8MYdeMyt9CHhBA@mail.gmail.com> <BN3PR0301MB1234DE8BA0D31AEE8321B3C8A6C00@BN3PR0301MB1234.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
To: Anthony Nadalin <tonynad@microsoft.com>
X-Source-IP: userv0022.oracle.com [156.151.31.74]
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/oauth/A-h2uYlqSvgHNlFV4_1wiuzgVtE>
Cc: "oauth@ietf.org" <oauth@ietf.org>, =?utf-8?Q?Rolando_Mart=C3=ADnez?= <m@rtinez.cl>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] IETF 95 - Buenos Aires
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/oauth/>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2016 06:13:28 -0000

+1. 

Phil

> On Jan 17, 2016, at 22:08, Anthony Nadalin <tonynad@microsoft.com>; wrote:
> 
> I’m afraid that I would have to agree with Brian (hopefully this is not a trend)
>  
> From: OAuth [mailto:oauth-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Brian Campbell
> Sent: Friday, January 15, 2016 9:16 AM
> To: Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>;
> Cc: oauth@ietf.org; Rolando Martínez <m@rtinez.cl>;
> Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] IETF 95 - Buenos Aires
>  
> Speaking for myself but I suspect others might be in the same boat - I'd love to see some additional time beyond the official meeting made available to try and make more progress on the open work in OAuth. But the week before IETF in a different country (even if it's only a 19h bus ride) just isn't logistically feasible for me.
>  
> On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 7:11 AM, Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>; wrote:
> Would it make sense to add an OAuth day to the OpenID Summit to prepare
> the IETF meeting, to play around with code, etc?
> 
> On 01/15/2016 01:58 PM, John Bradley wrote:
> > Yes I am going.
> >
> > The University of Chile and RedHat are sponsoring a one day OpenID Summit on Mar 31.
> >
> > I will send the registration info to the list once we have it up.
> >
> > Anyone interested should email myself or Rolando who is cc’d on this.
> >
> > John B.
> >
> >> On Jan 15, 2016, at 6:08 AM, Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>; wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> I have just requested a 2 hour meeting slot for the next IETF meeting in
> >> Buenos Aires.
> >>
> >> It would be good to know whether you are planning to attend the upcoming
> >> IETF meeting. Please drop me a private mail to tell me your plans.
> >>
> >> Ciao
> >> Hannes
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> OAuth mailing list
> >> OAuth@ietf.org
> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
> >
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OAuth mailing list
> OAuth@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
> 
>  
> _______________________________________________
> OAuth mailing list
> OAuth@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth