Re: [OAUTH-WG] How soon until last call on introspection and revocation

Todd W Lainhart <lainhart@us.ibm.com> Wed, 06 February 2013 15:00 UTC

Return-Path: <lainhart@us.ibm.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0C7221F8759 for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 07:00:27 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.534
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.534 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.064, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id J3Sk8VDrpyBx for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 07:00:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from e8.ny.us.ibm.com (e8.ny.us.ibm.com [32.97.182.138]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4CD221F8545 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 07:00:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from /spool/local by e8.ny.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for <oauth@ietf.org> from <lainhart@us.ibm.com>; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 10:00:26 -0500
Received: from d01dlp03.pok.ibm.com (9.56.250.168) by e8.ny.us.ibm.com (192.168.1.108) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 10:00:19 -0500
Received: from d01relay02.pok.ibm.com (d01relay02.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.234]) by d01dlp03.pok.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E19BC90021 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 10:00:19 -0500 (EST)
Received: from d01av05.pok.ibm.com (d01av05.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.195]) by d01relay02.pok.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id r16F0J9x290516 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 10:00:19 -0500
Received: from d01av05.pok.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d01av05.pok.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id r16F0I2o024670 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 10:00:18 -0500
Received: from d01ml255.pok.ibm.com (d01ml255.pok.ibm.com [9.63.10.54]) by d01av05.pok.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVin) with ESMTP id r16F0IjT024621; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 10:00:18 -0500
In-Reply-To: <64485787-77EE-4715-94E3-0A500992CDF2@gmx.net>
References: <OFF92A76B3.F047824F-ON85257B0A.004EF063-85257B0A.004F5490@us.ibm.com> <64485787-77EE-4715-94E3-0A500992CDF2@gmx.net>
To: Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-KeepSent: 5936093F:E5A22F4E-85257B0A:00521942; type=4; name=$KeepSent
X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 8.5.3FP2 SHF22 July 19, 2012
Message-ID: <OF5936093F.E5A22F4E-ON85257B0A.00521942-85257B0A.00526C2D@us.ibm.com>
From: Todd W Lainhart <lainhart@us.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2013 10:00:16 -0500
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on D01ML255/01/M/IBM(Release 8.5.3FP2 ZX853FP2HF4|December 14, 2012) at 02/06/2013 10:00:18, Serialize complete at 02/06/2013 10:00:18
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_alternative 00526C2C85257B0A_="
X-Content-Scanned: Fidelis XPS MAILER
x-cbid: 13020615-9360-0000-0000-00001039C3CD
Cc: IETF oauth WG <oauth@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] How soon until last call on introspection and revocation
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2013 15:00:28 -0000

Thanks Hannes.

> That document is not even a working group item. 

Ha.  I hadn't noticed that - I now see it is part associated to the 
"Network Working Group" instead of "OAuth Working Group". 

I'm confused, and perhaps it's just IETF ignorance, or me not paying 
attention.  What does it mean for the introspection spec, which describes 
itself to be an OAuth 2 endpoint, not to be in this WG?





Todd Lainhart
Rational software
IBM Corporation
550 King Street, Littleton, MA 01460-1250
1-978-899-4705
2-276-4705 (T/L)
lainhart@us.ibm.com




From:   Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>
To:     Todd W Lainhart/Lexington/IBM@IBMUS, 
Cc:     Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>, "IETF oauth WG" 
<oauth@ietf.org>
Date:   02/06/2013 09:47 AM
Subject:        Re: [OAUTH-WG] How soon until last call on introspection 
and revocation



Hi Todd, 

two answers:

1) Token Revocation:

I had initiated a Working Group Last Call for the token revocation 
document end of November:
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth/current/msg10102.html

As you have seen on the list, this has generated a fair amount of 
discussion. 

I hope that Torsten, the draft editor, is able to produce a new draft 
version quickly with a resolution of the open issues that is acceptable to 
the rest of the group. 

Then, we will have to judge whether the document can move forward to the 
IESG. 

2) Introspection

That document is not even a working group item. 

Ciao
Hannes

On Feb 6, 2013, at 4:26 PM, Todd W Lainhart wrote:

> Does anyone have any intuition as to how far away we are on last call 
for introspection and revocation?