[OAUTH-WG] Remote Participation for Vancouver (was Re: Meeting slot for the Vancouver IETF meeting requested)

Derek Atkins <derek@ihtfp.com> Thu, 02 August 2012 00:21 UTC

Return-Path: <derek@ihtfp.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26F8211E8106 for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Aug 2012 17:21:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.969
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.969 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.019, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_MISMATCH_ORG=0.611, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Znbxp3q6UM5K for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Aug 2012 17:21:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail2.ihtfp.org (MAIL2.IHTFP.ORG [204.107.200.7]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9686211E80D7 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Wed, 1 Aug 2012 17:21:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ihtfp.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64C7F260268; Wed, 1 Aug 2012 20:21:34 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mail2.ihtfp.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail2.ihtfp.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 03826-10; Wed, 1 Aug 2012 20:21:32 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mocana.ihtfp.org (unknown [IPv6:fe80::224:d7ff:fee7:8924]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "cliodev.ihtfp.com", Issuer "IHTFP Consulting Certification Authority" (not verified)) by mail2.ihtfp.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 273A9260245; Wed, 1 Aug 2012 20:21:32 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from warlord@localhost) by mocana.ihtfp.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q720LTad019946; Wed, 1 Aug 2012 20:21:29 -0400
From: Derek Atkins <derek@ihtfp.com>
To: Torsten Lodderstedt <torsten@lodderstedt.net>
References: <09CE58C6-9409-4E28-B4CA-DC76C37B898E@gmx.net> <4E1F6AAD24975D4BA5B16804296739436672BBBE@TK5EX14MBXC285.redmond.corp.microsoft.com> <B26C1EF377CB694EAB6BDDC8E624B6E7554F911D@BL2PRD0310MB362.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> <6DEBD33A-815E-460D-934E-A684AED2BA6B@ve7jtb.com> <FD90CDD8-7BC7-4952-BEF9-F29C282130E8@gmx.net> <5E393DF26B791A428E5F003BB6C5342A108171DC@OC11EXPO24.exchange.mit.edu> <50101C74.6060005@lodderstedt.net> <sjmipd5i167.fsf@mocana.ihtfp.org> <5779a15a8c83bd9cb0626a5c933d3e89@lodderstedt-online.de>
Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2012 20:21:27 -0400
In-Reply-To: <5779a15a8c83bd9cb0626a5c933d3e89@lodderstedt-online.de> (Torsten Lodderstedt's message of "Wed, 01 Aug 2012 17:31:54 +0200")
Message-ID: <sjmtxwmb0u0.fsf_-_@mocana.ihtfp.org>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.2a
Cc: Derek Atkins <derek@ihtfp.com>, oauth@ietf.org
Subject: [OAUTH-WG] Remote Participation for Vancouver (was Re: Meeting slot for the Vancouver IETF meeting requested)
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2012 00:21:37 -0000

Hi,

You can find remote participation info at:

http://www.ietf.org/meeting/84/remote-participation.html

Hannes, I am assuming that you will set up as the WebEx Host during the
meeting tomorrow?  I'm just not 100% sure how to audio *in* remotely.
Worst case I'll just use Jabber to send back in.

-derek

Torsten Lodderstedt <torsten@lodderstedt.net> writes:

> Hi Derek,
>
> I will give it a try. Where can I find the respective meeting data?
>
> regards,
> Torsten.
>
> Am 30.07.2012 19:55, schrieb Derek Atkins:
>> We will have a WebEx available if you can attend remotely?
>> That's my plan, as I cannot make Vancouver this week.
>>
>> -derek
>>
>> Torsten Lodderstedt <torsten@lodderstedt.net> writes:
>>
>>> Hi Hannes,
>>>
>>> I'm unfortunately had to cancel my trip to IETF-84. Phil will cover
>>> the status
>>> of the threat model document. But none of the authors of the
>>> Revocation Draft
>>> will be attending. So I would ask you to postpone the presentation
>>> of this I-D
>>> to the next IETF meeting as well.
>>>
>>> best regards,
>>> Torsten.
>>>
>>> Am 23.07.2012 17:02, schrieb Thomas Hardjono:
>>>
>>>     Hannes, Derek,
>>>
>>>     Would it possible to postpone presentation/discussion of the
>>> Dyn-Reg
>>>     draft (Dynamic Client Registration Protocol) to the
>>> Atlanta/November
>>>     IETF meeting?
>>>
>>>     The reason is that none of the proposers will be attending the
>>>     Vancouver IETF in-person.
>>>
>>>     Thanks.
>>>
>>>     /thomas/
>>>
>>>     __________________________________________
>>>
>>>         -----Original Message-----
>>>         From: oauth-bounces@ietf.org
>>> [mailto:oauth-bounces@ietf.org] On
>>>
>>>     Behalf
>>>
>>>         Of Hannes Tschofenig
>>>         Sent: Sunday, July 15, 2012 1:58 PM
>>>         To: John Bradley
>>>         Cc: oauth@ietf.org WG
>>>         Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Meeting slot for the Vancouver IETF
>>> meeting
>>>         requested
>>>
>>>         Hi all,
>>>
>>>         I have uploaded an agenda for the meeting.
>>>
>>>         I am assuming that all these items do not require
>>> discussion time
>>>         anymore:
>>>         * draft-ietf-oauth-assertions
>>>         * draft-ietf-oauth-saml2-bearer
>>>         * draft-ietf-oauth-urn-sub-ns
>>>         * draft-ietf-oauth-v2
>>>         * draft-ietf-oauth-v2-bearer
>>>
>>>         Hence, we can focus on the new items. As discussed in the
>>> mail below
>>>
>>>     I
>>>
>>>         put a separate slot for discussion of the
>>> holder-of-the-key/MAC
>>>
>>>     token
>>>
>>>         security discussion on the agenda. I would suggest that a
>>> couple of
>>>
>>>     us
>>>
>>>         meeting during the IETF week to work together on a
>>> presentation that
>>>         provides some concrete suggestions for next steps to the
>>> rest of the
>>>         group.
>>>
>>>         I also put the following persons on the spot for the
>>> presentations
>>>
>>>     of
>>>
>>>         working group items:
>>>
>>>         - OAuth Dynamic Client Registration Protocol (Thomas)
>>>         - JSON Web Token (JWT) (Mike)
>>>         - JSON Web Token (JWT) Bearer Token Profiles for OAuth 2.0
>>> (Mike)
>>>         - Token Revocation (Torsten)
>>>         - SAML 2.0 Bearer Assertion Profiles for OAuth 2.0 (Brian)
>>>         - OAuth Use Cases (Zachary)
>>>
>>>         Let me know if you want someone else to give the
>>> presentation.
>>>
>>>         As a preparation for the meeting it would be good if you
>>> could
>>>         (a) identify the open issues with your document, and
>>>         (b) find one or two reviewers to have a look at your
>>> document during
>>>         the next two weeks.
>>>
>>>         Ciao
>>>         Hannes
>>>
>>>         On Jul 15, 2012, at 5:59 PM, John Bradley wrote:
>>>
>>>             Yes we need to get clearer on the the threats and use
>>> cases.
>>>
>>>             I think Phil Hunt has some though there is likely
>>> overlap.
>>>
>>>             Part of the problem with MAC was people never agreed on
>>> the
>>>
>>>     threats
>>>
>>>         it was mitigating.
>>>
>>>             I can present something or coordinate with Tony or Phil.
>>>
>>>             John B.
>>>
>>>             On 2012-07-14, at 9:36 PM, Anthony Nadalin wrote:
>>>
>>>                 How about a few min on proof-of-possession
>>> requirements? I can
>>>
>>>         present our use cases and requirements
>>>
>>>                 -----Original Message-----
>>>                 From: oauth-bounces@ietf.org
>>> [mailto:oauth-bounces@ietf.org] On
>>>
>>>         Behalf Of Mike Jones
>>>
>>>                 Sent: Friday, July 13, 2012 4:42 PM
>>>                 To: Hannes Tschofenig; oauth@ietf.org WG
>>>                 Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Meeting slot for the
>>> Vancouver IETF
>>>
>>>     meeting
>>>
>>>         requested
>>>
>>>                 I'm willing to do 5 minutes on the status of the
>>> Core and Bearer
>>>
>>>         documents.
>>>
>>>                 I'm willing to give an update on JWT and the JWT
>>> Bearer -
>>>
>>>     probably
>>>
>>>         15 minutes.  It's probably good that we're a day after the
>>> JOSE WG
>>>         meeting, given the JWT dependency upon the JOSE specs.
>>>
>>>                 I'm willing to be part of a discussion on the
>>> Assertions draft,
>>>
>>>     but
>>>
>>>         would appreciate doing this with Brian and/or Chuck - I'm
>>> guessing
>>>
>>>     15
>>>
>>>         minutes for that as well.  (I'm not certain this will be
>>> needed, but
>>>         I'd like to review the recent changes before saying that
>>> it's not.)
>>>
>>>                 Looking forward to seeing many of you in Vancouver!
>>>
>>>                                                 -- Mike
>>>
>>>                 -----Original Message-----
>>>                 From: oauth-bounces@ietf.org
>>> [mailto:oauth-bounces@ietf.org] On
>>>
>>>         Behalf Of Hannes Tschofenig
>>>
>>>                 Sent: Saturday, June 02, 2012 12:46 AM
>>>                 To: oauth@ietf.org WG
>>>                 Subject: [OAUTH-WG] Meeting slot for the Vancouver
>>> IETF meeting
>>>
>>>         requested
>>>
>>>                 Hi all,
>>>
>>>                 I have requested a 2,5 hour slot for the upcoming
>>> meeting.
>>>
>>>                 While the next meeting is still a bit away it is
>>> nevertheless
>>>
>>>     useful
>>>
>>>         to hear
>>>
>>>                 * whether you plan to attend the next meeting, and
>>>                 * whether you want to present something.
>>>
>>>                 I could imagine that these documents will be
>>> discussed:
>>>                 * draft-ietf-oauth-dyn-reg
>>>                 * draft-ietf-oauth-json-web-token
>>>                 * draft-ietf-oauth-jwt-bearer
>>>                 * draft-ietf-oauth-revocation
>>>                 * draft-ietf-oauth-use-cases
>>>
>>>                 To the draft authors of these docuemnts: Please
>>> think about the
>>>
>>>     open
>>>
>>>         issues and drop a mail to the list so that we make some
>>> progress
>>>         already before the face-to-face meeting.
>>>
>>>                 I am assume that the following documents do not
>>> require any
>>>
>>>         discussion time at the upcoming IETF meeting anymore:
>>>
>>>                 * draft-ietf-oauth-assertions
>>>                 * draft-ietf-oauth-saml2-bearer
>>>                 * draft-ietf-oauth-urn-sub-ns
>>>                 * draft-ietf-oauth-v2
>>>                 * draft-ietf-oauth-v2-bearer
>>>
>>>                 Ciao
>>>                 Hannes
>>>

-- 
       Derek Atkins                 617-623-3745
       derek@ihtfp.com             www.ihtfp.com
       Computer and Internet Security Consultant