[OAUTH-WG] Remote Participation for Vancouver (was Re: Meeting slot for the Vancouver IETF meeting requested)
Derek Atkins <derek@ihtfp.com> Thu, 02 August 2012 00:21 UTC
Return-Path: <derek@ihtfp.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26F8211E8106 for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Aug 2012 17:21:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.969
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.969 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.019, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_MISMATCH_ORG=0.611, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Znbxp3q6UM5K for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Aug 2012 17:21:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail2.ihtfp.org (MAIL2.IHTFP.ORG [204.107.200.7]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9686211E80D7 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Wed, 1 Aug 2012 17:21:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ihtfp.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64C7F260268; Wed, 1 Aug 2012 20:21:34 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mail2.ihtfp.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail2.ihtfp.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 03826-10; Wed, 1 Aug 2012 20:21:32 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mocana.ihtfp.org (unknown [IPv6:fe80::224:d7ff:fee7:8924]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "cliodev.ihtfp.com", Issuer "IHTFP Consulting Certification Authority" (not verified)) by mail2.ihtfp.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 273A9260245; Wed, 1 Aug 2012 20:21:32 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from warlord@localhost) by mocana.ihtfp.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q720LTad019946; Wed, 1 Aug 2012 20:21:29 -0400
From: Derek Atkins <derek@ihtfp.com>
To: Torsten Lodderstedt <torsten@lodderstedt.net>
References: <09CE58C6-9409-4E28-B4CA-DC76C37B898E@gmx.net> <4E1F6AAD24975D4BA5B16804296739436672BBBE@TK5EX14MBXC285.redmond.corp.microsoft.com> <B26C1EF377CB694EAB6BDDC8E624B6E7554F911D@BL2PRD0310MB362.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> <6DEBD33A-815E-460D-934E-A684AED2BA6B@ve7jtb.com> <FD90CDD8-7BC7-4952-BEF9-F29C282130E8@gmx.net> <5E393DF26B791A428E5F003BB6C5342A108171DC@OC11EXPO24.exchange.mit.edu> <50101C74.6060005@lodderstedt.net> <sjmipd5i167.fsf@mocana.ihtfp.org> <5779a15a8c83bd9cb0626a5c933d3e89@lodderstedt-online.de>
Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2012 20:21:27 -0400
In-Reply-To: <5779a15a8c83bd9cb0626a5c933d3e89@lodderstedt-online.de> (Torsten Lodderstedt's message of "Wed, 01 Aug 2012 17:31:54 +0200")
Message-ID: <sjmtxwmb0u0.fsf_-_@mocana.ihtfp.org>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.2a
Cc: Derek Atkins <derek@ihtfp.com>, oauth@ietf.org
Subject: [OAUTH-WG] Remote Participation for Vancouver (was Re: Meeting slot for the Vancouver IETF meeting requested)
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2012 00:21:37 -0000
Hi, You can find remote participation info at: http://www.ietf.org/meeting/84/remote-participation.html Hannes, I am assuming that you will set up as the WebEx Host during the meeting tomorrow? I'm just not 100% sure how to audio *in* remotely. Worst case I'll just use Jabber to send back in. -derek Torsten Lodderstedt <torsten@lodderstedt.net> writes: > Hi Derek, > > I will give it a try. Where can I find the respective meeting data? > > regards, > Torsten. > > Am 30.07.2012 19:55, schrieb Derek Atkins: >> We will have a WebEx available if you can attend remotely? >> That's my plan, as I cannot make Vancouver this week. >> >> -derek >> >> Torsten Lodderstedt <torsten@lodderstedt.net> writes: >> >>> Hi Hannes, >>> >>> I'm unfortunately had to cancel my trip to IETF-84. Phil will cover >>> the status >>> of the threat model document. But none of the authors of the >>> Revocation Draft >>> will be attending. So I would ask you to postpone the presentation >>> of this I-D >>> to the next IETF meeting as well. >>> >>> best regards, >>> Torsten. >>> >>> Am 23.07.2012 17:02, schrieb Thomas Hardjono: >>> >>> Hannes, Derek, >>> >>> Would it possible to postpone presentation/discussion of the >>> Dyn-Reg >>> draft (Dynamic Client Registration Protocol) to the >>> Atlanta/November >>> IETF meeting? >>> >>> The reason is that none of the proposers will be attending the >>> Vancouver IETF in-person. >>> >>> Thanks. >>> >>> /thomas/ >>> >>> __________________________________________ >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: oauth-bounces@ietf.org >>> [mailto:oauth-bounces@ietf.org] On >>> >>> Behalf >>> >>> Of Hannes Tschofenig >>> Sent: Sunday, July 15, 2012 1:58 PM >>> To: John Bradley >>> Cc: oauth@ietf.org WG >>> Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Meeting slot for the Vancouver IETF >>> meeting >>> requested >>> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I have uploaded an agenda for the meeting. >>> >>> I am assuming that all these items do not require >>> discussion time >>> anymore: >>> * draft-ietf-oauth-assertions >>> * draft-ietf-oauth-saml2-bearer >>> * draft-ietf-oauth-urn-sub-ns >>> * draft-ietf-oauth-v2 >>> * draft-ietf-oauth-v2-bearer >>> >>> Hence, we can focus on the new items. As discussed in the >>> mail below >>> >>> I >>> >>> put a separate slot for discussion of the >>> holder-of-the-key/MAC >>> >>> token >>> >>> security discussion on the agenda. I would suggest that a >>> couple of >>> >>> us >>> >>> meeting during the IETF week to work together on a >>> presentation that >>> provides some concrete suggestions for next steps to the >>> rest of the >>> group. >>> >>> I also put the following persons on the spot for the >>> presentations >>> >>> of >>> >>> working group items: >>> >>> - OAuth Dynamic Client Registration Protocol (Thomas) >>> - JSON Web Token (JWT) (Mike) >>> - JSON Web Token (JWT) Bearer Token Profiles for OAuth 2.0 >>> (Mike) >>> - Token Revocation (Torsten) >>> - SAML 2.0 Bearer Assertion Profiles for OAuth 2.0 (Brian) >>> - OAuth Use Cases (Zachary) >>> >>> Let me know if you want someone else to give the >>> presentation. >>> >>> As a preparation for the meeting it would be good if you >>> could >>> (a) identify the open issues with your document, and >>> (b) find one or two reviewers to have a look at your >>> document during >>> the next two weeks. >>> >>> Ciao >>> Hannes >>> >>> On Jul 15, 2012, at 5:59 PM, John Bradley wrote: >>> >>> Yes we need to get clearer on the the threats and use >>> cases. >>> >>> I think Phil Hunt has some though there is likely >>> overlap. >>> >>> Part of the problem with MAC was people never agreed on >>> the >>> >>> threats >>> >>> it was mitigating. >>> >>> I can present something or coordinate with Tony or Phil. >>> >>> John B. >>> >>> On 2012-07-14, at 9:36 PM, Anthony Nadalin wrote: >>> >>> How about a few min on proof-of-possession >>> requirements? I can >>> >>> present our use cases and requirements >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: oauth-bounces@ietf.org >>> [mailto:oauth-bounces@ietf.org] On >>> >>> Behalf Of Mike Jones >>> >>> Sent: Friday, July 13, 2012 4:42 PM >>> To: Hannes Tschofenig; oauth@ietf.org WG >>> Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Meeting slot for the >>> Vancouver IETF >>> >>> meeting >>> >>> requested >>> >>> I'm willing to do 5 minutes on the status of the >>> Core and Bearer >>> >>> documents. >>> >>> I'm willing to give an update on JWT and the JWT >>> Bearer - >>> >>> probably >>> >>> 15 minutes. It's probably good that we're a day after the >>> JOSE WG >>> meeting, given the JWT dependency upon the JOSE specs. >>> >>> I'm willing to be part of a discussion on the >>> Assertions draft, >>> >>> but >>> >>> would appreciate doing this with Brian and/or Chuck - I'm >>> guessing >>> >>> 15 >>> >>> minutes for that as well. (I'm not certain this will be >>> needed, but >>> I'd like to review the recent changes before saying that >>> it's not.) >>> >>> Looking forward to seeing many of you in Vancouver! >>> >>> -- Mike >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: oauth-bounces@ietf.org >>> [mailto:oauth-bounces@ietf.org] On >>> >>> Behalf Of Hannes Tschofenig >>> >>> Sent: Saturday, June 02, 2012 12:46 AM >>> To: oauth@ietf.org WG >>> Subject: [OAUTH-WG] Meeting slot for the Vancouver >>> IETF meeting >>> >>> requested >>> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I have requested a 2,5 hour slot for the upcoming >>> meeting. >>> >>> While the next meeting is still a bit away it is >>> nevertheless >>> >>> useful >>> >>> to hear >>> >>> * whether you plan to attend the next meeting, and >>> * whether you want to present something. >>> >>> I could imagine that these documents will be >>> discussed: >>> * draft-ietf-oauth-dyn-reg >>> * draft-ietf-oauth-json-web-token >>> * draft-ietf-oauth-jwt-bearer >>> * draft-ietf-oauth-revocation >>> * draft-ietf-oauth-use-cases >>> >>> To the draft authors of these docuemnts: Please >>> think about the >>> >>> open >>> >>> issues and drop a mail to the list so that we make some >>> progress >>> already before the face-to-face meeting. >>> >>> I am assume that the following documents do not >>> require any >>> >>> discussion time at the upcoming IETF meeting anymore: >>> >>> * draft-ietf-oauth-assertions >>> * draft-ietf-oauth-saml2-bearer >>> * draft-ietf-oauth-urn-sub-ns >>> * draft-ietf-oauth-v2 >>> * draft-ietf-oauth-v2-bearer >>> >>> Ciao >>> Hannes >>> -- Derek Atkins 617-623-3745 derek@ihtfp.com www.ihtfp.com Computer and Internet Security Consultant
- [OAUTH-WG] Meeting slot for the Vancouver IETF me… Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Meeting slot for the Vancouver IET… John Bradley
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Meeting slot for the Vancouver IET… William Mills
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Meeting slot for the Vancouver IET… Phil Hunt
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Meeting slot for the Vancouver IET… Torsten Lodderstedt
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Meeting slot for the Vancouver IET… Eve Maler
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Meeting slot for the Vancouver IET… Mike Jones
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Meeting slot for the Vancouver IET… Zeltsan, Zachary (Zachary)
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Meeting slot for the Vancouver IET… Mike Jones
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Meeting slot for the Vancouver IET… Anthony Nadalin
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Meeting slot for the Vancouver IET… John Bradley
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Meeting slot for the Vancouver IET… Phil Hunt
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Meeting slot for the Vancouver IET… Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Meeting slot for the Vancouver IET… John Bradley
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Meeting slot for the Vancouver IET… Phil Hunt
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Meeting slot for the Vancouver IET… Anthony Nadalin
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Meeting slot for the Vancouver IET… Thomas Hardjono
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Meeting slot for the Vancouver IET… Torsten Lodderstedt
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Meeting slot for the Vancouver IET… Derek Atkins
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Meeting slot for the Vancouver IET… Torsten Lodderstedt
- [OAUTH-WG] Remote Participation for Vancouver (wa… Derek Atkins