Re: [OAUTH-WG] Rechartering

David Recordon <recordond@gmail.com> Sun, 12 September 2010 01:09 UTC

Return-Path: <recordond@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 286AA3A6802 for <oauth@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 11 Sep 2010 18:09:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.474
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.474 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.124, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lwz3pD2P8wUC for <oauth@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 11 Sep 2010 18:09:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-iw0-f172.google.com (mail-iw0-f172.google.com [209.85.214.172]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 643273A67A4 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Sat, 11 Sep 2010 18:09:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by iwn3 with SMTP id 3so4387052iwn.31 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Sat, 11 Sep 2010 18:10:03 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=CN9CR0xjQrZDYDMXm+gwEMzOAYT2Y4qfmfxRDM0Ybug=; b=enmUG42ETdt2lYMByA94u+xcfNkaMynfYdjUCibCrQ7MUl30pV53nv0PBnRwdxKrAd AOqCwmZ+F8hL5s7Afw8Gvrh1curjVdTFpjljA2bO2ZRKLFMFdJJGcNZkJCg4sWbLHe0a L+g3JqGIBqrRXyzYb/MbAkl0w/YT+hIcvHNrc=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=uPQlCFp4ADFIt0WkYe5+3JKIc7so89sUnxAHRDjeG9YNsEQ6QmFZrQ8BBSdvY0ma+E Ay+yscJeFF9hrZypbi29Sf1EhwYw+ncJt9aZpmMQaJT6sBEEsZvhjV6DNbyuCijQ+J8m DhWdANhLpWxbOD3mBzz5YmnsYjVlcoUN4yaFE=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.231.171.7 with SMTP id f7mr3614869ibz.72.1284253802850; Sat, 11 Sep 2010 18:10:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.231.149.14 with HTTP; Sat, 11 Sep 2010 18:10:02 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4C8C1BA1.1020902@gmx.net>
References: <4C8C17F9.9050908@gmx.net> <4C8C1BA1.1020902@gmx.net>
Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2010 18:10:02 -0700
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=B2jxcT1hFRhZ7NoPxQJHLw7=Ak7wuMgMvOOxe@mail.gmail.com>
From: David Recordon <recordond@gmail.com>
To: Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016369f9dc7b86b0c049005a327
Cc: oauth@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Rechartering
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2010 01:09:38 -0000

I'd like to see us finish Core before considering re-chartering. :)

But to your original question. I'm interested in the UX extension (said I'd
edit), device flow (said I'd edit), and the OpenID Connect work which
encompasses dynamic registration and likely artifact binding (also editing
but outside of the IETF).


On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 5:15 PM, Hannes Tschofenig <
hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net> wrote:

> I forgot an item already, namely 'identity management using OAuth' in the
> style of OpenID Connect.
>
> At IIW we also had a chat about an implementers guide and interoperability
> tests. The idea of the implementers guide is create a living document that
> captures implementation experience with different programming languages and
> development frameworks. It was also expected that implementers will bundle
> different profiles and different extensions in their implementation and it
> would be useful to describe their experience.
>
> In any case, I think both items are important.
>
> Ciao
> Hannes
>
>
> On 11.09.2010 19:59, Hannes Tschofenig wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> at the Washington Internet Identity Workshop we had the chance to chat
>> about OAuth. Given the progress on the main specification we should
>> discuss WG re-chartering.
>>
>> The following items had been proposed at the meeting:
>>
>> * Messaging Signing
>> Example: http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth/current/msg04250.html
>>
>> * User Experience Extensions
>> Example: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-recordon-oauth-v2-ux/
>>
>> * Artifact Binding
>> Example: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-sakimura-oauth-requrl/
>>
>> * SAML for OAuth
>> Example: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-campbell-oauth-saml/
>>
>> * Recommendations of commonly used Scope values
>> No draft available (to my knowledge)
>>
>> * Dynamic Client Registration
>> Example: http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-oauth-dyn-reg-v1-00.txt
>>
>> I am interested to hear
>> a) what items are important for you; we cannot work on everything at the
>> same time.
>> b) what items are you willing to co-author (requires a hard time
>> commitment)
>> c) what items are you willing to review
>> d) whether we should consider other items?
>>
>> Btw, to have your work considered you have to submit an IETF draft.
>> Please use the Web tool to upload it:
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/idst/upload.cgi
>> Also use the following filename convention:
>> draft-[author last name]-oauth-[some short name]-[version#].txt
>>
>> Ciao
>> Hannes
>> _______________________________________________
>> OAuth mailing list
>> OAuth@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
>>
>>  _______________________________________________
> OAuth mailing list
> OAuth@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
>