Re: [OAUTH-WG] Rechartering

I'd like to see us finish Core before considering re-chartering. :)

But to your original question. I'm interested in the UX extension (said I'd
edit), device flow (said I'd edit), and the OpenID Connect work which
encompasses dynamic registration and likely artifact binding (also editing
but outside of the IETF).

On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 5:15 PM, Hannes Tschofenig <
hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net> wrote:

> I forgot an item already, namely 'identity management using OAuth' in the
> style of OpenID Connect.
>
> At IIW we also had a chat about an implementers guide and interoperability
> tests. The idea of the implementers guide is create a living document that
> captures implementation experience with different programming languages and
> development frameworks. It was also expected that implementers will bundle
> different profiles and different extensions in their implementation and it
> would be useful to describe their experience.
>
> In any case, I think both items are important.
>
> Ciao
> Hannes
>
>
> On 11.09.2010 19:59, Hannes Tschofenig wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> at the Washington Internet Identity Workshop we had the chance to chat
>> about OAuth. Given the progress on the main specification we should
>> discuss WG re-chartering.
>>
>> The following items had been proposed at the meeting:
>>
>> * Messaging Signing
>> Example: http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth/current/msg04250.html
>>
>> * User Experience Extensions
>> Example: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-recordon-oauth-v2-ux/
>>
>> * Artifact Binding
>> Example: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-sakimura-oauth-requrl/
>>
>> * SAML for OAuth
>> Example: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-campbell-oauth-saml/
>>
>> * Recommendations of commonly used Scope values
>> No draft available (to my knowledge)
>>
>> * Dynamic Client Registration
>> Example: http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-oauth-dyn-reg-v1-00.txt
>>
>> I am interested to hear
>> a) what items are important for you; we cannot work on everything at the
>> same time.
>> b) what items are you willing to co-author (requires a hard time
>> commitment)
>> c) what items are you willing to review
>> d) whether we should consider other items?
>>
>> Btw, to have your work considered you have to submit an IETF draft.
>> Please use the Web tool to upload it:
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/idst/upload.cgi
>> Also use the following filename convention:
>> draft-[author last name]-oauth-[some short name]-[version#].txt
>>
>> Ciao
>> Hannes
>> _______________________________________________
>> OAuth mailing list
>> OAuth@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
>>
>>  _______________________________________________
> OAuth mailing list
> OAuth@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
>