IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OAUTH-WG] AD review of draft-ietf-oauth-urn-sub-ns-02

Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> Thu, 21 June 2012 19:31 UTC

Return-Path: <barryleiba.mailing.lists@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C85ED11E80C1 for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 12:31:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.935
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.935 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.042, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zNxVFqaQb9aR for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 12:31:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lb0-f172.google.com (mail-lb0-f172.google.com [209.85.217.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A821111E80BC for <oauth@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 12:31:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by lbbgo11 with SMTP id go11so2809089lbb.31 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 12:31:06 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=0dZHNRnDwlLdzm3nq1Z/fxF6NRRTFavkJgiyu+mjrsM=; b=mb9Md7TvbdDrmAfyrFHW1QNBkkMxXZsG6tDPApVQXyCnCYDMuWtle8NlGlNj4qkgXW CLoM/Bs1VGd4fXo+jHVKGIKLzE/PGZUUtZaQ1pmzd8utFA+PaNGoyHc/36nYnY/K5jqF 0YfKRdnBcOH9qCq7xCf33Q0TOle58oIcbbxRbo54+TsGM1bpHamR7fBCFMHl6FEmEKMe 6d6jfOl6RkVLd/cbWaKBAtPbVFqXmIEqw37IUbaDWUssSi/gw4UiGOKlZIyI+lj8kA/j DuKfB0Tixm2VAeRcsF/ES+JgkB1PDrjBlLZnRX0B+6fnEGBeYfGUtZrhJ/dPjuISmME4 yL8g==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.152.103.11 with SMTP id fs11mr27496962lab.23.1340307066570; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 12:31:06 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: barryleiba.mailing.lists@gmail.com
Received: by 10.112.48.104 with HTTP; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 12:31:06 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4CD0B85C-C88D-4B52-81E4-5D53A25E60EF@cs.tcd.ie>
References: <4FE1C16D.6010602@cs.tcd.ie> <F606CA9D-9DB6-460E-BE7A-BC989A4AB25F@gmx.net> <CAC4RtVCrQ9yG6V_XwczXo_FvCkyCXJDfmrb-p0UX3KRW7Edx9A@mail.gmail.com> <4CD0B85C-C88D-4B52-81E4-5D53A25E60EF@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 15:31:06 -0400
X-Google-Sender-Auth: lueS0gwWR5sDKiyMNLykjqElxiA
Message-ID: <CAC4RtVBEjDeoJzbxGwkTHsk2REv8+6GELywR7Sv-dsRm8LGw2A@mail.gmail.com>
From: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: "oauth@ietf.org" <oauth@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] AD review of draft-ietf-oauth-urn-sub-ns-02
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 19:31:12 -0000

>> Stephen:
>> Yeah, I'm not sure Standards Track is needed.
>
> On this bit: I personally don't care, except that we don't have to do it twice
> because someone later on thinks the opposite and wins that argument, which
> I'd rather not have at all  (My one-track mind:-) Doing the 4 week last call means
> once is enough. But I'm ok with whatever the WG want.

Well, it's not a 4-week LC, but a 2-week one.  Anyway, yes, I see your
point, and I've done that with other documents.  Better to make it
Standards Track for now, note in the shepherd writeup that
Informational is probably OK, and let the IESG decide.

b

v2.14.0 | Report a Bug | By Email